-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
I still see the Hornets as the most likely trade partner simply because Hayward will be hard to trade because of his salary, age and injury history. I’m afraid some of the other possibilities are just pipe dreams. Let’s just look at one example why.
The Knicks are in desperate need of a point guard. They can send Noel, Burks and Walker for Brogdon and Buddy, plus the Knicks own all their 1st rounders and the Mav’s first next year. The Pacers do it to clear their books plus receive 2 useful players in Burks and Noel who both have club options the following year. The added bonus for them is they only have to waive Walkers 9 mil instead of Westbrooks 47 mil. And the get a first rounder probably next year. For the Knicks they get their point guard they need and a useful player in Buddy. Plus they only probably have to give up one pick because of the value of Noel and Burks.
Then with Noel on board if they can’t extend Turner they can trade him to the Raptors. The Raptors need a center and were after him before he was hurt. The Raptors could send 24 year old OG Anunoby to the Pacers, probably straight up. OG is actually one of my targets if we trade AD to the Raptors. He is a 6’ 7” wing, excellent defender averaging 17 a game and is a .365 3 point shooter. That would probably be enough although the Raptors have picks to spare as well. The Raptors do this deal because Scottie Barnes was amazing this year and would slide into OG’s spot.
The point here is there will be competition for good players and it is unlikely that the good players will be simply dumped for salary. These teams will turn over every rock before dumping. This is another reason I don’t expect anything soon.
-
Aloha, Michael,
I think the Pacers and Hornets trades are both very possible. The question is whether the Lakers can expand either of the trades.
I also think you need to understand that these trades are being made for financial rather than talent purposes. Westbrook gives those teams a chance to dump salary without having to give up a first round draft pick to do it. That is why there will be multiple offers for the Lakers to trade Russ.
Russ for Hield and Brogdon or Hayward and Oubre would be deals so valuable to the Pacers and Hornets because they would not require them to give up a pick to dump the salaries.
In fact, the wild card is the Pacers or Hornets could even get two first round draft as a sweetener back if they expanded the trade to be for Turner, Hield, and Brogdon or Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre.
The reality is the Lakers have a big advantage because there are multiple teams they could trade Westbrook too and no real competition with a similar expiring contract to open the door for the Pacers or Hornets to clean up their books and open up cap space and avoid future luxury taxes.
-
I think everyone understands why the Pacers would do the deal Tom. I simply pointed out that they are likely to be able do better, that’s why I said I think the Hornets is more likely because there will not be the same interest in Hayward as there is in Brogdon and especially Turner. All the articles I have read agree that Russ is likely to be bought out no matter who trades for him. Everyone knows the Knicks are looking for a point guard. If the Pacers do the deal I proposed, the Pacers get out from under the contracts they don’t want, obtain draft picks in the next couple of years and land 2 players that they can use or trade. Noel and Burks both have team options in 2023 so they have trade value. And they only have to waive Walkers 9 mil instead of Westbrooks 47 mil. The Knicks are happy as well because they get Walker off the books. From every perspective except a Laker fans, that’s a much better deal. And if they trade Turner to the Raptors for a guy like OG, they get a 24 year that fits their time line and is every bit as talented on the wing as Turner is at center. They could possibly pick up another draft pick there as well. I clearly see why the Pacer would deal with the Lakers but only as a last resort. And you are the only one that thinks the Pacers do the deal without draft picks. Every single article I’ve read believe that the Lakers have to give up their picks for Brogdon and Buddy. While I would love to land Brogdon even with his injury history, it’s more likely that we end up with a player like Hayward and hope he can stay healthy.
-
-
The debate here seems to be the difference between what could happen and what is likely to happen. I think Michael’s take is the more realistic version of events for the following reasons:
1) Pacers have long stated they don’t do full rebuilds. Yes, they shop their players…all teams do that for the majority of the guys on the roster. There’s nothing that has altered that stance, not even when they traded George for Oladipo (at the time) and Sabonis. So, to imagine that they will now go full rebuild and trade away the entire core of their roster for a player they will buy out and 2 others likely to walk after the season for two draft picks five years from now does not seem realistic. Could it happen? Again, sure. Will it happen? Highly unlikely. Shrinking the trade w/Indy makes more sense rather than trying to hit the walk off grand slam. Or swap Rubio for Brogdon and ask for a 2nd rounder this summer and bring back a room exception to keep Monk.
2) New York. Started signaling early that they were not interested in Russ. No reason to not take them at their word, honestly. Russ isn’t a Thibb’s style guy in that Tom and Russ both want to do it their way and I don’t see those ways meshing all that much. Is there a glimmer it could happen because Rose can’t go 82 at his age/injury history and Russ is ready to play all day, every day? I don’t think so, these aren’t the Phil Jackson run Knicks taking on bloated contracts for mediocre role players that fit into a philosophical approach to the game, they’ve pivoted to a smarter brand of running the team from the top down and, despite this season, I think it’s working for them. Not surprisingly the Knicks and Pacers are linked in the trade rumor world, too. Along with the Kings and Pistons so…no surprise…the rest of the league is looking at the same handful of available-ish players we all are. I don’t see any deal with new York happening that involves Russ.
3) Hornets. Seems the most likely to happen and the trade I would actually NOT make. Westbrook for hayward creates a logjam at the three. LeBron is best at the 3/4 (for LeBron, not for the Lakers) and Hayward, at this point is the same. Too slow and broken to defend fast guys, not big enough to or athletic enough to be a good rebounder and Hayward’s injury history is quickly becoming the stuff of legend. I’d angle for a Oubre, Plumlee, Washington or even an extended Trezz over Hayward. Hornets are under the cap so could add a trade exception. Problem with that is now they have a guard problem so you have to sell them hard on the savings for a Russ buyout. Feels like they would only trade Russ for Gordon and that, for me, is a no-go zone. Also the most likely of the trades to happen, unfortunately and Rob will likely be functioning in panic mode to keep his job.
I expect Russ to be dealt, his exit interview all but cemented it. But the return will be a lateral move. We will not get more than, at best, one quality player back. Expanding it, in my mind, makes it more difficult to move him because you’re only attaching players who will walk next season so unless a team thinks it can use nearly $60 million in cap space in 2023-24 to rebuild the roster as they see fit why make the trade?
Here’s a list of the 2023 UFAs:
PG
Patrick Beverley (35)
Eric Bledsoe (34)
George Hill (37)
Reggie Jackson (33)
Frank Ntilikina (25)
D’Angelo Russell (27)
Ish Smith (35)
Gabe Vincent (27)
Kemba Walker (33)SG
Will Barton (32)
Sterling Brown (28)
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope (30)
Seth Curry (33)
Terence Davis (26)
Javonte Green (30)
Josh Richardson (30)
Terrence Ross (32)
Nik Stauskas (30)SF
Keita Bates-Diop (27)
Bojan Bogdanovic (34)
Dillon Brooks (27)
Torrey Craig (33)
Danny Green (36)
Maurice Harkless (30)
Justin Holiday (34)
LeBron James (39)
Caris LeVert (29)
Kelly Oubre (28)
Max Strus (27)
Andrew Wiggins (28)
Kenrich Williams (29)
Justise Winslow (27)PF
Harrison Barnes (31)
Marquese Chriss (26)
Jae Crowder (33)
Danilo Gallinari (35)
Jerami Grant (29)
Juan Hernangomez (28)
Maxi Kleber (31)
Kevin Love (35)
Larry Nance Jr. (30)
Georges Niang (30)
Dario Saric (29)
Christian Wood (28)C
Steven Adams (30)
Taj Gibson (38)
Al Horford (37)
Nikola Jokic (28)
Alex Len (30)
Brook Lopez (35)
Boban Marjanovic (35)
Chimezie Metu (26)
Mason Plumlee (33)
Jakob Poeltl (28)
Dwight Powell (32)
Myles Turner (27)
Nikola Vucevic (33)
Moritz Wagner (26)There really aren’t a lot of head-turning free agents coming on the market. Jokic leads the pack and he’s quite likely to stay in Denver. The best players on the list are also not likely to be looking at small market teams first. There aren’t a lot of max money players on that list to begin with. So all that wonderful cap space starts to have a little less luster on it. Especially for a small market team in a state with income taxes, and possibly other social issues that could easily affect how some of these guys feel about signing there. Being a business, as it is, the likelihood is that some team or other will over-pay for Wiggins, Wood, Vucevic, Brooks, or D-Russ. Is that worth gutting the roster to buyout Russ?
All I’m saying is that the Russ option for a team is highly unlikely to be option #1 on their internal big board. It’s not a good one, it’s basucally admitting defeat because you’re going to buy him out and hope for a 1st rounder or two 5 years out for your troubles. Expanding it to include THT & Nunn isn’t necessarily a great or even good idea. Unless you’re looking to feature Nunn or THT and bet on them being able to take big steps forward (doubtful in Nunn’s case and THT has shown zero consistency) Klutch will maneuver THT to a bigger market and Nunn will move on. A ton of factors working against a great trade for Russ. A lateral trade is far more likely.
Which brings one back to the question of is it even worth it to trade Russ at all?
-
How dare you bring logic & common sense to these fantasy trade scenarios!! We only look at these things from how the Lakers benefit here sir. Somebody WILL blow up their entire roster in order to make Christian Wood the centerpiece of their organization..lol
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
I do believe that the Lakers will try to trade Russ for sure after his exit interview meltdown. But for me, I’m not sure any of the realistic trade proposals really elevate us into serious title contention. Both Brogdon and Harvard make me very nervous with their injury histories over the last several years. The question for me is how much would Westbrook be willing to give up in a buyout. From his interview it’s pretty obvious that he has little desire to remain a Laker. Is dead salary of say 12 mil for 3 years worse than Haywards 30 mil for 2 years if he is not playing? If Westbrooks agent can find him a few years at 10 to 15 mil perhaps he would lower his buyout amount. A buyout would allow us to retain Malik who I believe is ready for an expanded role, allow us to utilize the bi annual exception of 4 mil and save our draft picks for possible trades this summer. If I had to pick one player among Hayward, Brogdon and Malik, it would be Malik.
As a fan, I would like to see the decisions quickly but the trade partners that have been mentioned may want to wait for the playoffs to end to see what their assets would bring league wide.
We are probably looking at a few months of rumors and speculation. Not exactly fun for me.-
I still remain optimistic the Lakers will be able to move Westbrook for two or three rotation players. As for timing, it’s doubtful a trade would happen before June 23rd, the day of the NBA draft.
Only hope for early news is Indiana or Charlotte, whose season is now over, winning the race for Russ’ $47M expiring contract so they can salary dump rotation players on long-term contracts.
Otherwise, it’s going to take forever for the Lakers to trade Russ and hire a new coach.
-
Trade Anxiety was a great title, Michael.
I find myself torn between the Pacers and the Hornets as trading partners. Here’s a ranking of the various trade options:
1. Turner, Hield, and Brogdon. Turner is key to this trade.
2. Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre. Rozier is key to this trade.
3. Brogdon and Hield. Love a big backcourt.
4. Hayward and Rozier. Worry about a small backcourt.
5. Wood and Gordon. Missing a point guard.
6. Grant and Olynyk. Missing a point guard.How would you rank these returns?
What other players would you target?-
I doubt if there will be a race to trade for Russ. Perhaps the Hornets try to get something done with Hayward for draft assets to trade. The Pacers are different. I actually look at the Lakers as a fall back plan if nothing else pans out. The Pacers have maintained that they are not looking for a complete tear it down. I think they will see what they can get for Brogdon and Buddy. As for Turner they have stated over and over again that they would like to extend him. If they can’t they will explore the market for him. There will be several teams making offers. Unless someone offers a godfather offer early they may even wait until after the playoffs are over. As far as the deal I’m most interested in, it would be the one that could save draft capital to be used in other trades because none of these deals will get us beyond a 4th or 5th seed unless we luck out in free agency like we did with Malik and a couple of kids make giant leaps.
-
There’s no doubt a better market for the players we want from the Pacers than those we want from the Hornets.
While Brogdon has injury issues and Hield defensive issues, Turner is still 26 and led the league in blocks.
Hayward, while only losing same number of games as Brogdon, has had more serious injuries. Rozier has same defensive issues as Hield but also lacks size. Oubre is a frustrating player with potential.
I’m also interested in any deals we could make to move Russ without giving up a pick, e.g. Russ for Brogdon and Hield or Russ for Hayward and Rozier.
My dream trades are still deals where we sent Russ, THT, Nunn, and both picks for Turner, Brogdon, and Hield or Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre.
My rank of the players we’re targeting:
1. Myles Turner – Stretch five, rim protector
2. Christian Wood – Stretch five, rim protector
3. Malcolm Brogdon – Point guard, elite shooter
4. Terry Rozier – Point guard, elite shooter
5. Jerami Grant – Bigger 3&D Wing
6. Gordon Hayward – Bigger 3&D Wing
7. Buddy Hield – Elite volume 3-point shooter
8. Eric Gordon – 3&D bully ball shooting guard
9. Kelly Oubre – Bigger 3&D Wing
10. Kelly Olynyk – Stretch fiveLove to see your ranking of these 10 players. Thanks.
-
1. Grant
2. Rozier
3. Brogdon (injuries)
4 Heild
5 Oubre
6 Wood (PF only))
7 Hayward(injuries)
8 Gordon (34 and injuries)
9 Olynyk
10 Turner. only because we have no chance.-
Looks like one of us wants size via a stretch center and the other via a power forward. Both know we need a new point guard. Here’s our combined ranking, lower is better.
1. Malcolm Brogdon – 6 points
1. Terry Rozier – 6 points
1. Jerami Grant – 6 points4. Christian Wood – 8 points
5. Buddy Hield – 11 points
5. Myles Turner – 11 points7. Gordon Hayward – 14 points
7. Kelly Oubre – 14 points9. Eric Gordon – 16 points
10. Kelly Olynyk – 19 points
-
-
-
-
-
Only 2 guys who move the needle for me are Brogdon (if actually healthy…a HUGE “if”) and Jerami Grant (if his stats aren’t just a result of playing on bad teams). Only time I’ve ever seen the Pacers talk about moving Turner was before they traded Sabonis. But anything built around AD being the best dude on the team is bound to fail in the end…imho
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
Week one less coaching candidate. Wonder if our next coach will come from the high school ranks
The Los Angeles Lakers are searching for a new head coach after firing Frank Vogel on Monday following a disastrous season, but it appears at least one potential replacement isn’t very interested in the job.
Utah Jazz head coach Quin Snyder, who has been rumored to be a potential candidate, is reportedly less interested in becoming the next Lakers head coach because of how the franchise handled Vogel’s firing, according to Broderick Turner of the Los Angeles Times.
-
Here’s Turner’s full comment:
“Not only is Snyder under contract with the Jazz for at least one more season, people not authorized to speak publicly on the matter said he has become less interested in the Lakers’ job because of how the Vogel firing was handled.”
‘Become less interested’ is the not the same as ‘not interested,’ especially since the Jazz would have no problem letting him go. Nurse is more of a long shot because he has a great team to work with. Quin’s problem is he has a team that’s peaked and is now coming down. He could still be a viable coaching candidate for the Lakers. You’re headline is permature. Snyder’s still probably the leading candidate when you consider he will likely be available and has a history with the Lakers. He’s not going to stay with the Jazz or go to the Kings. Lakers job is his for the taking.
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
Just heard Rob say he collaborated with Frank in their working relationship. I wonder if Frank is thinking “in what universe did we collaborate?” Rob comes off as this squeaky clean manager. Yet from reports he is not well like around the league. It’s said he approaches negotiations like an agent, not a GM. Just look at how he handled the Kings trade. I think GM’s around the league will be looking to take us to the cleaners.
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
Last nights game was more fun than just about anything else that happened in this disaster of a season. Austin hit triple double numbers that only 3 other rookies in league history have achieved and Malik didn’t help our chances of keeping him with 41. I thought it was in poor taste how the beat writers focused more on Franks firing than their career nights. At least the kids gave him a smile on the way out.
Frank really got jobbed. The Lakers decided to change the style of play on him and gave him a roster that did not play to his strengths. They should have never given him extension in the first place if they were going to change directions on him. At least he will get an additional few mil for his trouble. Give this guy defenders and an average offense and he can win. Give him a collection of has beens and he will fail. Who could have really done much better?
Frankly this organization is a mess and one wonders if an experienced NBA coach will want to step into this cow pie. Ty Lue probably gives a little prayer of thanks every night that he didn’t end up on the Lakers.
Building a big 3 is nearly impossible or more teams would do it. The Warriors built theirs through the draft and cashed in big when the salary cap exploded and they landed KD. You can have 3 great players but if you don’t have any depth left it doesn’t matter. Just look at the Nuggets, they were hit just as hard the Lakers with injuries, yet they had enough left to land the 6th seed. And the Griz went 20 and 2 WITHOUT Ja. The truth is even if Russ had been everything they hoped for this team didn’t have enough depth to win a championship. Frank was a casualty of this folly.
Now the entire organization is in shambles and even if the most optimistic of trade proposals happen, we won’t be a true contender next year, it could actually could be years. Frank is gone, yet Rob, Kurt and Jeanie and all those responsible for this mess will still be there.
-
Aloha, Michael. Great post and Frank certainly deserved better.
The Lakers need to decide what kind of team they want to be. They had a template that worked that they should have just tweaked to include a modern stretch center so I’m hopeful even the Lakers front office can see the right path forward, which is better starters around LeBron and AD, a stretch five center who can protect the rim besides AD, size at small forward and guard so we can once again play small-ball-on-steroids.
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
I enjoyed the game again last night. Win or lose It’s fun watching your team play hard. I was rooting for DJ to hit one more shot. It would have been the first time I can remember where everyone who played hit double figures. I think the kids will all make the team next year. It doesn’t mean they will all find major roles but I would rather have them at the end of the bench then a 36 year old vet min retread.
But I’m very concerned about the future of this team. One wrong move this summer could set the franchise back for years to come. And when you have a front office famous for wrong moves, it’s a little unsettling. Just looking at the competition in the West makes building a new contender over one summer nearly impossible.
Unless LeBron says he would like to move on, I doubt if either he or AD will be traded. But if LeBron is given that nearly 50 mil extension it will be difficult to build a contender around our 2 stars. Even if they remained relatively healthy. Tearing it down and rebuilding maybe the fastest way to become a contender again but I’m confident that will not happen. So what we do with Russ becomes that much more important.
I really don’t have a lot of confidence that we can have a club transforming trade using him a a couple of distant picks. I was surprised when I read that the Hornets were interested, when they already have a ball dominate guard in Ball. But MJ owns the team and if there is one guy in the league that will make a bad deal for Russ, it’s Mike. The Hornets most pressing need is at center. It’s no secret that they covet Miles Turner. If the Pacer are able to extend Turner like they want to, a trade with the Hornets becomes more likely. Two names jump out at you on the Hornets roster, Gordon Hayward and Terry Rozier. Both have contracts that the Hornets would like to get out of. I doubt we would get both, but again this is Mike’s team so you never know. Adding both would certainly be an upgrade, even adding one of the two would be helpful. It’s questionable if they would lead to a ring but we would definitely be better.
The next team you hear about is the Pacers. All though they are hard to read. A lot of what they do will depend on if the can extend Turner. If they can’t and they have to trade him it could change the types of players they will be looking for. There was talk at one time about a Hayward for Turner deal with the Hornets. Now Pincus proposed a Russ and our 2 1st rounders for Brogdon and Buddy as an example. Those are the contracts the Pacers want to rid themselves of. Again it would be an upgrade but hardly a championship move. And the PG hungry Knicks will probably seriously be in the hunt for Brogdon if he hits the market. So this is a rather long shot.
The Knicks have said that hey are not interested but if they have no PG prospects, they may take a look at Russ. But they would probably be looking to dump Fournier and Walkers bad contracts. That kind of deal probably wouldn’t cost a pick. I would do it if Reddish was included. But again, Walker would probably be stretched and Fournier would be a scorer off the bench. Again not a transforming deal.
The Rockets Wall and perhaps Gordon? All I can say is Hell no. We could actually be worse. Paying a pick and THT to become a worse doesn’t move my needle.
Of course the OKC trade to create a big trade exception is another losing proposition. You have to have picks to send someone to use the exception and if you trade them to create the exception, what’s the point?
Then there is the stretch option which would add 12 to 15 mil to our cap for 3 years. I think I would rather keep Russ, because just dumping him isn’t going to help us win and we still wouldn’t have a lot of space to work with. But I would let Westbrooks agent try and find a deal. In the right situation, with the ball in his hands Russ is still probably a 15 to 20 mil player. If his agent could find a 2 or 3 year deal it could substantially lower the amount we would have to buy him out for.
Then we have THT and maybe Nunn to trade. While THT has definite upside he hasn’t been consistent enough to tempt a team into giving up a star. Would the Pistons give up Grant if we throw in both 1st rounders? Possibly but while Grant is very good, it wouldn’t be enough to put us over the top next year.
If you haven’t figured it out I am not very optimistic at this point. I can see Russ coming back next year. Which wouldn’t be as bad as some other moves we could make. The problem is there will be tremendous pressure on the front office to do SOMETHING. I am just hoping that the something doesn’t set us back even further.
-
Aloha, Michael,
I also enjoyed watching the Lakers kids finally win a game easily. I think we have four young players I would like to see them bring back next season: Reaves (team option), Johnson (team option), Gabriel (team option), and Monk. I expect us to exercise team options on Reaves, Johnson, and Gabriel and hopefully re-sign Monk to the TP or NT MLE.
We’re facing a critical offseason with a front office that’s had problems making good decisions, which could easily end up in disaster. I’m still hoping the Lakers will bring back Magic as a consultant to help create and implement a vision of a team that more closely resembles our bubble championship style of play but with modern stretch five center. I trust Magic more than Pelinka.
I agree the Lakers are not going to trade LeBron unless he refuses for some reason to sign an extension. Short of that, the Lakers are not going to trade their best two players who less than 18 months ago led the team to their 17th NBA championship. I expect LeBron to verbally confirm he will sign an extension on August 4th so the Lakers can make moves in early July to trade Russ and rebuild their roster back to championship caliber.
I do agree the Lakers will have to be extremely lucky to trade Russ for the three starters we need to rebuild the starting lineup around LeBron James and Anthony Davis. I do think there’s a good chance, however, that we can trade Russ and our two draft picks for at least two legitimate championship starters. The two could be Brogdon and Hield from the Pacers, Wood and Gordon from the Rockets, or Hayward and Rozier from the Hornets would be examples of the kinds of deals that Lakers will be looking for in return for Russ and two first round draft picks.
The Lakers top target should still be Myles Turner plus Malcolm Brogdon, offering Russ’ $47M expiring contract and both of their first-round draft picks. The Pacers have still not firmly decided whether to trade Turner or not and they do have two young centers they like in Jalen Smith and Isiah Jackson. Ironically, Jackson is the player picked with the Laker 2022 first-round draft pick. While the Pacers keep talking about not doing a complete rebuild, they’ve already traded their best prospects and look to firmly be on the way towards a complete rebuild. Anyway, we all know how frustrating it is to try and predict trades.
It will be interesting to see if the Knicks open up to trading for Russ as they need a point guard and star power and can use a $47M expiring contract to rework their roster. I could see the Lakers possibly interested in bringing back Julius Russell and some of the Knicks’ mistakes like Fournier and Walker if they did not have to give up a draft pick but only if they can’t get what they want for Russ and the two picks. Similarly, I think there’s a trade to be made with the Thunder that could create a $30M trade exception the Lakers could use to acquire a pair of starters.
Next, we have THT and Nunn to trade. I’d still love to Cam Reddish from the Knicks but they probably want to get back the draft pick they paid to get him. I also like the idea of trading for Kelly Olynyk as a backup stretch center. I would do the trade for Grant with the two picks if we can’t get Turner or Wood. I still like the Lakers having the versatility to play two bigs (Turner and Davis) or go small (James and Davis). I do agree with you that LeBron should be the four rather than the three with Turner as the five. The solution to me is AD at the three.
Bottom line, I want to get much bigger than we are now. We need to have size at every position. Guards who are 6’ 5” and forwards who are 6’ 8” to 6’ 10.” I want to replicate the bully ball roster we had in the bubble but with modern two-way centers rather than low post traditional centers. I also believe we need to get a starting point guard back in one of these trades and ideally, even a backup point guard.
Finally, I do think there will be an option seriously considered by the Lakers that involves keeping Russ and his $47M expiring contract to create up to $35M in cap space for the summer after next, when LeBron (extension) and AD will be the only players with contracts. This would then mean signing no new players except for one-year deals to make that plan work. This ‘Run it back again’ movement could gain momentum if the Lakers can’t find an easy deal and could get support from everybody wanting to claim we would have won but for the injuries. If Lakers cannot find the right trade for Russ, this could be the backup plan.
I’m with you hoping we somehow make the right moves. I do think having Magic as part of the decision making process would hep ensure a smarter decision. -
Michael, that’s an insightful and thoughtful article. I thoroughly enjoyed reading this. I like how the kids share the wealth last night that led to a blowout. I guess that’s what happens when you are playing under no pressure and not having to look over your shoulder. The effort was there but most importantly, the chemistry seemed much improved. THT, though, looked a bit gassed from his 40 point outing the previous night. Still, they gave us something to enjoy two games in a row.
I agree with you about having the kids back next year( Reaves, Johnson, Gabriel, and Monk). I also agree with Tom about having bigger size players just like we had in the bubble. Our lack of size killed us this season, and we didn’t have the luxury of going big when we needed to.
I am hoping that the front office will come up with a better roster next season. I am done with the blame game going on with this season’s failure. It didn’t work out as expected but at this point, I am willing to let the dead bury the dead and work instead to build a better roster next season.
-
aloha Tom, i have no idea what happened to my first response to you but I’ll try again. its clear we are far apart on what we believe we can get in a Russ trade. I do know this, we will not get Turner in a trade for Russ. i usually say never say never but on this i will make an exception. we will not get Turner. The word out of Indy since the Sabonis trade is they want to extend Turner. stein just reiterated that today. they would like to pair him with Jalen Smith, who by the way is a PF not a center. so they know what they want to do. the question is can they extend him. If they can’t then they may look to trade him. if that happens we will have to get in the back of the line behid four to five other teams that are interested. The Hornets covet him as does the Raptors and we don’t have the assets to complete with either, especially the Raptors. If Turner had not gotten injured he probably would be a Raptor. I actually believe we will be a fall back plan for Brogdon at best. He is a good player and will certainly have other suitors. i look for the Knicks to look at him. Speaking of the Knicks, they are not going to dump Randle in a Russ trade. As much as I like Randle and wish it were so, I can’t see them trading him to us one year removed from 2nd team all NBA. they can get more. For me the Hornets make the most sense. Hayward has 2 more years at 30 mil left and Rozier has 4 more years at 20+ mil left. Rozier would make a lot of sense. He is the perfect PG to play with Lebron because he can play off the ball. I would be a little nervous about Hayward. He has been injured a lot and will be pushing 35 when his contract is up. he won’t be easy to trade so i can see why the Hornets might do it. I actually would like to see Rozier and Oubre coming back to us but the Hornets may insist on Hayward being part of the deal. But it is probably the best we can do.
-
I will flat out say no to Hayward, as much as I like him. I am very wary of injury-prone players and I don’t want anything to remind me of the injury-riddled season we had this year. Oubre and Rozier would be fine with me as I like them for what they bring to the table and still have some left in the tank. My preference would be to focus on more young players. I am done with the proverbial over-the-hill players.
-
I know what you mean Buba. He came back for one game April 2nd and went out again with a foot. In the last 3 years he has played 49, 44 and 52 games. I know one thing I wouldn’t add any firsts to that kind of trade. We would be helping them out as much as they would be helping us.
-
-
I long ago gave up trying to get Tom to see reality in his trade proposals, if the money works the trade is all but consummated in his mind. Which is fine, I just had to stop going along for the ride. I comment on the ones I think have a shred of possibility of happening. I think we would all welcome Turner, that’s not the issue, it’s that he’s on a fairly cheap deal given his level of production, Indy already traded Sabonis, and they don’t do rebuilds. I’m always happy to be wrong but too often I am not, like how I predicted that the Lakers would make zero moves at the trade deadline, and other not really inspiring but certainly fueled by reality observations. Same goes for the draft picks, they’re slightly more valuable now that first one will convey a couple months sooner. It’s not that we don’t have assets or players to trade, it’s that our picks are inferior to those other teams can offer and teams know we’re functioning from a point of desperation. Other GMs will look to exploit that and I don’t really think Rob is savvy enough for the perils this summer will present.
-
It’s always a crap shoot to propose a trade as 99% of the trades that are proposed by more informed and smarter basketball people than myself never happen.
Opinions are like anuses. Everybody has one. You are always skeptical about any proposed trade because you prefer to look at life with the glass half full. I prefer to look at the glass as half full.
While you may feel I am unrealistic in my trade proposals, I never propose trades that I don’t think have a chance of happening. Doesn’t mean they’re going to but does mean there are arguments why the trade could happen.
You look mostly at just the players involved and not the other factors like cap space and other reasons why the other team might be interested. I’m not saying every trade I propose has a good chance of happening, just that there is a logic that could lead to the trade happening.
The other thing you need to understand is trades are the biggest way teams can change their fortunes. They’re always great fodder for conversations about what the team needs and how might they get it. My goal always is to create conversations and controversy for Lakerholics to discuss. When I post a trade idea from another source, I will usually express my opinion in the title or comment.
At any rate, feel free to laugh at any trades I propose but don’t expect me to stop providing trade content or the Lakers to stop trying to make trades. You alwayts take the easy way out by claiming nothing is going to happen. You’ll have to eat those words this summer.
-
Tom, I look at all angles, including cap space. That is exactly why I wrote that the Hornets deal might be the most likely one. They are on the books 2 more years with Hayward and 4 more with Rozier . With the emergence of Bridges who will need a new contract and Ball neither Hayward or Rozier are in their long term plans. I also never said nothing will happen so I will not have words to eat. A Brogdon/Buddy deal is a possibility. I mearly stated that Brogdon is a very good player, he will probably be the best PG on the trade market and the Knicks are desperate for a PG. And there we will be other interested parties, that’s why I believe it is unlikely. If you can move a player for useful pieces it’s always better then a salary dump. If they can’t find a deal then they may look to dump him and Buddy. The only deal I actually said won’t happen is Turner. I seem to do something you don’t when considering trades. I pay attention to what is being said. It’s been stated since after the trade deadline that the Pacers want to extend him and if they can’t then they might trade him. I also pay attention to who else is interested which you never seem to. There are several teams with more assets that are interested in Turner. And if they can’t find a deal they like I still don’t believe they dump him. A deal for Brogdon is going to cost 1st round picks anyway. They gain nothing by adding Turner since he has an expiring contract. They would just hold on to him and see what they can get at the deadline. So I will gladly eat my words if we do land Turner.
-
I have no issue whatsoever with your propensity to propose trades, it’s just that I can’t get into the weeds on the ones I flat out don’t see as being realistic. It’s often not that I don’t think the trade makes sense from the perspective of the Lakers or as a Laker fan but that I see literally zero reasons why the other team(s) involved would make the deal. Could it happen is light years away from Will or even should. Anyhow, the season is nigh over, mercifully, and I’m far more excited about baseball than our prospects to j in notice the team so while I hope we make a great deal this summer my prediction would be we end up holding into Russ or accepting some busted , broken player back in return. I’m still not sure which i prefer.
-
-
-
Aloha, Michael,
Yes, it does seem like we don’t agree on many things these days, which is understandable as we’re in one of the most volatile and unpredictable times in the history of the Lakers franchise. It’s not a problem that we don’t agree nor should this turn into a competition over who’s right or wrong. Let’s not make this personal. I respect your opinions even if I don’t agree with all of them. This is a blog and the goal is to exchange ideas and become better informed.
I don’t understand why you want to die on the ‘Lakers will never get Myles Turner’ island. The player who is the Pacers center of the future is not 26-year-old Myles Turner but 20-year-old Isaiah Jackson, who has the shot blocking hops and 3-point shooting Myles has but is a better fit with the timeline the Pacers are creating with 22-year-old Tyrese Haliburton, 20-year-old Jalen Smith, and 24-year-old Chris Duarte.
While I do think it’s more likely the Pacers would trade Hield and Brogdon to the Lakers as that saves them the most future salaries but it’s not a slam dunk like you claim that Turner is not going to be traded. He will be traded this summer or at the trade deadline. Like you said, you should know by now, never to say never.
You could be right about our not having the best trading chips to get Turner. That’s a better argument than claiming he is not going to be traded. Turner wants a big extension and a bigger role than he had with the Pacers before. So he may not be willing to sign an extension and the Pacers may not be willing to give him what he wants because of his fit with the rest of what they are doing.
I guess what it comes down to is I believe the Lakers 2027 and 2029 first round picks are going to highly valued because they are post-LeBron picks that could be made unprotected by the Lakers. We saw how many deals the Lakers were offered by teams trying to get the 2027 pick at the deadline. I believe both the 2027 and 2029 picks will be very desirable picks and should be enough to get us two if not three new starters to go with LeBron and AD. That’s what I believe and hope Rob will be able to do this summer. Is that overly optimistic? Possibly.
I do agree with you that the Hornets could be a possibility but I also think the Knicks could be a possibility. I think they already regret Julius’ contract and Russ’ apparent willingness to buyout his contract for next season could swing things so the Knicks could be suddenly interested. I do like being able to address our wing size needs with Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre. There may be other teams too depending on how the playoffs go.
Russ’ $47M expiring contract will have suitors as it gives a team a great opportunity to clear cap space to pursue free agents. In fact, there’s part of me that worries the Lakers may decide to blow off next season by running it back with Russ, knowing that they would be able to free up $35M in cap space to pursue the replacement for LeBron James.
Bottom line, there are going to be a half dozen to a dozen teams who will be interested in trading rotation players with multiple year contracts to the Lakers for Russ’ $47M expiring contract and two unprotected post-LeBron first round draft picks. Lakers will get at least two new starters out of Russ, THT, Nunn, and the two picks. That’s still my prediction and I stand by it.
-
-
Agreed on the Westbrook optimism, the only thing gives me hole (potentially) is how some team or another could flame out in the playoffs. There’s still a lot of basketball left that could alter that situation. Unlikely, but possible. Have to admit that even watching the kids is pretty bittersweet as there will be nothing after. We’re just waiting for the schedule to pull the plug on an already expired season.
-
Obviously the Pacers disagree with you on who they want at center next year because they want to extend Turner so Jackson probably isn’t there yet. If Jackson develops they can trade Turner in the future. They have stated many times they are not going to go full on rebuild. And I never said that he won’t be traded. You said that for me. I said it just won’t be to the Lakers. They already turned down a first THT and Nunn. Adding Turner to the Brogdon trade which will already require first round picks would not make sense, considering he will be pursued by several other teams with better assets then we have. I believe they would hold onto him until the trade deadline before he was included in a salary dump.
-
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha
I watched game with no delusions of us actually winning. I watched primarily to see how the young guys responded. I thought they did a great job. It’s a pleasure to watch guys playing with that kind of energy. It reminded me of the years we were developing all those young players. Playing hard, giving it their all. Sure they made mistakes but they were mistakes of aggression that you can live with from young guys. They attacked all game long. Just a couple of thoughts.
THT showed what he can do when he is used properly. He needs the ball in his hands. He needs to work on his 3 point shooting and his shot selection but he does have a lot of upside.
Malik’s game continues to grow. Not only is a 3 level scorer but he has evolved into a quality playmaker and his defense continues to improve. I’m just hoping we can keep him.
Reeves got off to a good scoring start. He stopped really looking for offense. He does so many little things. He needs to working on his catch and shoot 3’s but he will be an important piece moving forward.
I think Dwight was under utilized all year. From DJ starting at the beginning of the year to all the games he sat when we could have used his size. Plus he will finish the year as our best 3 point shooting percentage 😂
I don’t think the Warriors can win another ring until the address their center position. They don’t have a shot blocker and we attacked the paint all game. I would be surprised if they don’t take a look at Turner if he does go on the market. They have the picks and players to land him.
We can have a few young guys with upside that can help us next year. Nunn will likely opt in and he will be a quality role player as well.
-
I have not commented for a while. I was in a period of mourning ever since the Lakers wrapped a nice gift and give the 10th play-in seed as a present to the Spurs and get eliminated from the postseason. The Spurs didn’t have to do much. All they have to do is sit back and watch the Lakers implode. Only four wins since the all-star break? That will do it. Who knows, even the Kings might catch us if the season is extended. If I have to grade the Laker’s season I would grade it as “Incomplete” even though the season was a failure. Having your top three stars play only a combined 21 games out of 82 is cruel to me as a fan.
However, I like the way the youngsters played tonight. That kind of energy and youthful bravado is what has been missing for most of the season.
This is going to be a long offseason as I will really miss the game-day rituals that my wife and I have become accustomed to. She always makes sure she cooks and invite our neighbors to come to join us and watch the game with us. We will still watch the remaining games even though it’s a lost season. Sadly, not the ending I was hoping for.
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha
Just read a tweet that Lakers haven’t ruled out stretching Russ. Who ever that source was should be fired immediately. If a team values Russ, they could just wait and see if he’s waived. One thing about Mitch. There were never any leaks. Lakers now have a lot of loose lips in house.
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha
It looks like the Lakers are waiving Trevor so they can sign a young player for next season. The player wasn’t named but I’m thinking it could be Gabriel who has shown some real promise.
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
Just saw a little tweet from Mark Stein that the Hornets might have interest in Russ. That’s surprising considering their need for a center. Looking at their Roster The often injured Hayward seems like the player they maybe interested in moving. He will have played less than 50 games each of the years with the Hornets. He has 2 years left at 39 mil after this year. They might look to move Scary Terry for the center they need, which Russ would fill his spot. Hayward is a good player when he can play. It will be interesting to see what they want to do. By the way Tom before you post a trade proposal, I doubt that Ball or Bridges will be part of the package. 🙂
-
Aloha, Michael,
A lot of the interest in Russ is also interest in a potentially unprotected post-LeBron first round draft pick. We saw at the trade deadline that every deal the Lakers were discussing fell through because we would not give up the pick. We can expect that same attitude this summer. Truth is, after watching the Lakers pick projected to end up in top-ten, there will be a lot of interest in potentially unprotected post-LeBron Lakers’ first round draft picks.
We both agree the Lakers should generally use their picks to acquire the right players rather than getting rid of the wrong ones, meaning Russ. The Lakers best option is to trade Russ and the two picks for three quality rotation players like Turner, Brogdon, and McConnell from the Pacers or Rose, Randle, and Reddish from the Knicks. Those are the kinds of trades the Lakers are hoping they can put together this summer. 1-on-1 trades to turn Russ into three rotation players.
If they can’t find a team with three acceptable rotation players, then they can spit the picks up and do two deals for one or two rotation players. The Hornets could be one of those one-pick deals. A trade of Russ and a pick for Hayward and Oubre would be good deal for the Lakers, giving them two desperately needed bigger 3&D wings and still leaving them with a pick to use in a Horton-Tucker and Nunn trade, maybe for a stretch five center like Kelly Olynyk or Cam Reddish. Bottom line, Lakers would be able to get a trio like Hayward, Oubre, and Olynyk or Reddish would be a terrific yield for Russ, 2 picks, and THT and Nunn.
-
Feels like the expected haul for Russ is either oft-injured and streaky or broken and expensive. Hoping for something better but expecting about that level of impact.
-
Lakers – Hornets Russell Westbrook Trade
Los Angeles Lakers trade Russell Westbrook and their 2027 first round draft pick to the Charlotte Hornets for Gordon Hayward and Kelly Oubre, Jr. Oubre becomes Lakers starting shooting guard and Hayward their starting small forward. pic.twitter.com/Kny5BGjERf
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) April 7, 2022
-
Lakers and Hornets Westbrook Offseason Trade
Hornets take Westbrook's expiring contract and Lakers 2027 first round pick in exchange for $61.6M due Hayward next two years and $96.2M due Rozier next four years. Trade $157.4M in salaries for $47M. Save $110.4M over next 4 years. pic.twitter.com/73EK9uUv9e
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) April 7, 2022
-
So the rumor mill says Charlotte is interested in Russ. If they have real interest would you do this deal if nothing better was on the table? Keep in mind as of this off-season each of these deals has 1 less year on them. pic.twitter.com/wre25i3ViB
— Laker Central (@LakerCentral365) April 7, 2022
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha
When I heard that LeBron was out I knew that it would be hard to win. The teams played hard. Russ with the exception of free throws was great, and AD put in a gutty performance after he tweaked the foot. After watching how hard the team played, the reality of this season became clear. Even if all the injuries and Covid lost games remained the same, if we had played with this kind of energy and effort all season we wouldn’t be sweating the playoffs now. We just lost to many games because of lack of effort. In that sense we really don’t deserve to make the playoffs.
There is still hope, the Spurs could lose 3 of 4 and we could win out. And the Spurs do not have it easy either. But you kind of wonder what the point is. LeBron and AD will still be trying to play through energy. And the biggest issue with a top heavy squad is lack of depth to compensate for injuries. While I will watch and root for the guys, even if we get into the play in and somehow win 2 games, we won’t have enough to get past the Suns with a hobbled AD and LeBron.
-
Thanks for the post, Michael. Just like you, when I heard LeBron’s not playing I was was completely deflated.
I was very impressed with the way the team played tonight, especially AD and Russ. Sadly, we never got a chance to see what this team could exactly look like if not for all the injuries that took a toll on the team’s trajectory.
From the preseason to this point we never had a break from the injury bug. Some might base that on the age of the roster while others might call it unlucky. I am part of those who think we’re unlucky with all the injuries we have had to deal with. Sometimes you can only be as good as your luck. And we are just not lucky.
Looking at how AD and Russ played tonight tells me if we were healthy during the season and with LeBron’s stellar performance throughout the season, when healthy, this team could be far more dangerous than what we have seen.
Unfortunately, it is what it is. Still, I am hoping for a miracle but that’s all I got.
-
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
After watching last nights game, I’m not sure what we can do to turn the organization around for another run at a ring. Yes AD just got back and LeBron was playing hurt. Still looking at the big picture, I really don’t see any trades that can elevate us to contender status this summer, even with good health. Our assets are just to limited.
Is it time to move on from LeBron. Probably but I don’t see it happening. The biggest problem with LeBron is if we extend him he will be earning close to 50 mil moving forward. With AD the 2 will be earning around 95 mil. So even when Russ falls off the books it doesn’t leave a lot of room to build a solid supporting group. And LeBron has become a liability on the defensive end. It was telling when the Lakers were guarding BI with Russ. And when Russ sat AD guarded him. For those calling for a trade for another center, I ask you, who will guard the 3? LeBrons value on defense now is being able to sit back and play free safety. Frank had LeBron guarding the Least dangerous offensive player. But even Hayes back doored him for 2 layups.
Even the most optimistic trade scenarios will not make us better then the Suns, Griz, Warriors, Nuggets and the Clippers. Heck if they can stay healthy the Clippers might win it all next year.
So first I think we should not use a draft pick just to dump Russ. I would rather bring him back then waste an asset that will do nothing to improve our chance. As far as I’m concerned we should not trade any of our 1st round picks unless it can return a foundational player for the next several years.
I would also see what we could get for AD, that won’t happen either but he could replenish some assets that could help us rebuild in the future.
I think Russ probably would like to leave as much as we want him to. I would give him permission to hunt for a new deal. Even if it’s say 10 mil a year for 2 years. Perhaps he would agree to a buyout of 30 mil, that would be easier to stretch.
I guess I’m pessimistic but when looking at all the names you see that might be available. It wouldn’t be enough. John Wall is Westbrook without as much athleticism left. Gordon will be 34. He is hurt again but at least played 56 games. He managed a total of 56 over the previous 2 years. Wood, a decent PF but not a game changer. Brogdon and Buddy. Nice upgrade but not going to get us past some of the other teams.
My fear is we will make more dumb moves that will set us back even further. If we are lucky enough to keep Malik, we could continue to develop the young guys and then pick up a couple of non washed free agents, with health we could at least be competitive. Then we can see what we can do in free agency the following year. I would rather be decent with a future, than waste more of the future on a team that will not seriously contend.
-
Aloha, Michael,
Most Lakers fans at this point have lost confidence in the Lakers’ ownership, front office, coaching staff, and players, including superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis. It’s fun to imagine the Lakers selling the franchise to a billionaire who brings in an elite professional head of basketball operations, who establishes a vision for the organization and hires a proven head coach to execute it.
We all realistically know none of that is going to happen. Instead, Rob Pelinka is once again going to make the final decision after pushing and pulling from the rest of the Lakers stakeholders, including Kurt and Linda and Magic Johnson. The best we can hope for is Rob and all the other participants in the Westbrook decision now understand why it was a mistake to trade for Russ. We don’t need a third superstar. We need legitimate championship starting quality 3&D players with size to fit and complement superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
I’m optimistic the Lakers will be successful moving Russ and our two first round draft picks for two or three upgrades to our starting lineup. Westbrook’s $47 million expiring contract is clearly a desirable trade asset for many NBA teams. The Pacers, Rockets, Knicks, and other NBA teams who want to move players on long-term contracts to save money and clear up cap space view Westbrook as a valuable financial opportunity to reduce future expenses and increase flexibility.
There’s no question LeBron is better suited to play the four than the three but I still believe the direction the Lakers should take this summer is to pursue Myles Turner or Christian Wood, modern centers who can shoot threes and block shots. It could very well work out that Turner plays the five, James the four, and Davis the three. We know Anthony can defend all five positions at all three levels. It would be in many ways a return to the roots that won us the championship but with the ability to play big or small on steroids with each position super-sized.
I’ve become convinced watching this Lakers team and the latest versions of LeBron and Anthony that we need to get bigger. Right now, the Lakers are too small at every single position. We won our 17th championship by being a big team playing a bruising bully-ball style of small-ball-on-steroids that overpowered opponents. I would like to see us return to that kind of roster construction this summer with a focus on trading for a modern center who stretches the floor on offense, protects the rim on defense, and allows us to go super big or small.
-
-
-
From the moment the game started and the turnovers start piling up to the tune of five turnovers in the first quarter alone I knew the Lakers were on their way to hospice care. The missed free throws only made that journey more attainable. And to make things more confusing to me, what happened to Reaves, Melo, and THT? At least we could use Reaves’ energy and Melo’s midrange, if not his three point shooting. Lebron and AD combining for 2-9 in the fourth quarter is not acceptable.
-
Well Buba, Melo was sick. THT has been battling that ankle injury for a couple of weeks. He’s been in and out of the line up with it. As far as Reeves, I’m not sure. I know he’s been struggling a bit on both sides of the ball lately. I don’t know if it’s the rookie wall thing or what. Both LeBron and AD were gassed in the 4th. I would have liked to see them run something for Malik or DJ on that last play. Everyone in the building knew LeBron was going to get the ball. We basically have to win out now.. after the Blazers the spurs have the Nuggets, TWOLVES, Warriors and the Mavs. And they all have something to play for so the Spurs are not out of the woods either but they hold the tie breaker as well so we basically need to win out. Steph is out and CP3 probably won’t play either, so there is that I guess. It’s looking pretty bleak.
-
-
And some among us will still say we should double down on this core and can expect championship contention. They are who they’ve shown us to be, and to expect different now is either just blind homerism, or at worst, just a lack of understanding of this game. Lebron and AD were the 3rd and 4th best players on the court last night, and that’ll never get it done. Paying a guy increasing salary for diminishing returns isn’t a recipe for championships, it’s a recipe for high lottery picks. Picks these same bloggers will have you believe are worth trading for a championship window that’s closed. Send him back to Cleveland. His “home” where it all began. Let them deal with his decline same way they got to enjoy his peak.
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
I’ve given up trying to figure this team out. From management, to the coaches to the players, nothing rarely makes sense. Just a few observations.
When the offense is humming the defense is generally better. LeBron had a great first half, but it was all within the flow of the offense. That flow stopped in the 2nd half, and the team reverted to LeBron ball. The ball stopped moving and the assists with it. One example Monk had 12 points in the first half but just one shot in the 3rd quarter. DJ hit a couple of 3’s in the first half, got one shot in the 2nd. And to make matters has sprained his ankle and hobbled through the rest of the game. Of course as usual, when the shots stopped falling so did the defense. We have seen it over and over again all season, still it surprises me. That’s my character flaw I guess. Just too optimistic.
Again the coaching seemed like they had money on the Pels. In what world do you take Dwight out and put LeBron on a true 7 footer with muscle and weight? If that wasn’t enough they put guards on inspector gadget AKA BI and let him into the paint to shoot over the undersized guards. He scored 7 points in less than 3 minutes which was the ball game. Our switch everything defense has been burned so many times it’s going to need skin graphs.
While Malik was off from 3 going 2 for 8 he is unlike some 3 point specialists like Buddy, he has plenty of other ways to get buckets. Why he’s not featured more , especially with AD down, I will never understand. With LeBron unlikely to play for a while they better come up with a game plan that will prominently feature him.
While I love the things that Austin brings to the game, I think if we are starting both Dwight and Gabriel, he should come off the bench. His inconsistent offense hurts more than his defense helps when we have a couple of other non scorers starting. I think Malik is the better choice. We only seem to win when we score a lot. LeBron and Russ are already defensive liabilities, yes I know LeBron makes some spectacular plays on D but he spectates more then he makes plays. We need another scorer.
Are we cooked? Probably. Even if AD makes a return soon, without LeBron against the teams we have left, it’s going to be nearly impossible to make the play in when you consider the cake walk that is the Spurs schedule. And Pop isn’t going to tank, especially if he can stick it to the Lakers.
1 Comment -
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
I thought the effort tonight was good. The 76ers had their complete team while we were with out our star players again. Yet we didn’t back down. I’m really encouraged by the play of our young guys development. We only played 8 guys tonight. Most of our old vets sat, while the young players took over their roles.
For Russ it was a tale of 2 halves. He was terrible in the first half. 5 turnovers and 3 for 11 shooting help dig another hole but he helped dig us out in the 2nd.
Stanley had a great over all game. I was impressed with his defense when assigned to Harden. On offense 13 points and 8 assists on gave him a well rounded game.
I thought Dwight had an excellent game as well. Yes Embid hit his average of 30 but Dwight scored 24 himself on 6 less minutes. I would like to see Dwight get a little run, because he showed he still has a little gas left in the tank.
Malik and Melo outscored the entire 76ers bench 43 to 27. They were both really effective offensively.
I’m sure Gabriel will get a contract at some point before the playoffs so he can play. If Rob is smart he will do what he did with Stanley, and sign him with at least a player option for next year. This guy hustles and competes. Sometimes it takes longer for a player to develop. Gabriel was a 5 star recruit and ranked as the 14 best player in the country his senior year. I think he has a lot of upside.
What is interesting for me is we maybe building a quality supporting cast for next year. While Austin didn’t have a particularly good night he leads the team in plus minus and generally makes a impact. He we somehow keep Malik, along with Stanley, Gabriel, and probably Nunn, will have a few younger. THT will probably be traded but if not, I think he will be better next year as well. Now if we can just clamp down a little more on defense, we may make some noise if we make the playoffs.
- Load More Posts
Friends
LakerTom
@thomashwong
Jamie Sweet
@jamiesweet
Recent posts
3rd seed
- November 18, 2024
Click baits be funny
- October 28, 2024
3 in a row. Not bad
- October 27, 2024
Just one game, but…
- October 23, 2024
Looking forward to this year
- October 21, 2024
Sigh
- August 31, 2024
Come on man
- August 18, 2024
My click bait take
- August 17, 2024
Disgraceful
- July 30, 2024
3 things that changed everything
- July 16, 2024
Unexceptionable
- July 6, 2024
Buddy Hield
- July 4, 2024
Been saying all along the Pacers can get much better offers for quality, desirable players than the heinous Russ deal and draft picks eons away. Trading for Hayward gives you 3 players you’d be lucky to have play 60% of the season. All roads point to you’re better off blowing up this puppy.