Profile Photo

Jamie SweetOffline

  • 597

    Posts

  • 5.4K

    Comments

  • 15.5K

    Views

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    I have to say I saw this going down 3 different ways and not minding any of them.

    1) Could have kept both Mo and Malik, seen what a full camp and a more established role could have done and have two nice-sized deals to use at what is sure to be a wild and wacky trading deadline this season.

    2) Package Mo and Malik and a multitude of draft picks, swaps, or even young players in a trade for an instant impact player. One assumes Rob and Co. did their due diligence on this one, kicked many tires on many trades, and came away unimpressed with the return.

    3) Let then expire and rock free agency in a way only the Lakers can! I would have been fine with any of the above moves but I like this one best because it indicates what I think is a very important lesson learned: valuing continuity.

    I’m thinking back to what LeBron said about teams who beat us having more chemistry, being together longer, and us not having that extra something to fall back on. This is showing that the Lakers are building an actual NBA team and not just assembling talent. Any player we bring in with the exceptions or cap space we use can be traded as well as Malik and Mo could have been with the bonus being if we don’t trade them then we’ll start to build that chemistry The King was yearning for.

    As always team health will be the biggest factor but these subtle organizational choices give me a little more hope. Nice to see us continuing to pursue smart moves.

    Smart Moves vs. Risky Gambles

    I have to say I saw this going down 3 different ways and not minding any of them.

    1) Could have kept both Mo and Malik, seen what a full camp and a more established role could have done and have two nice-sized deals to use at what is sure to be a wild and wacky trading deadline this season.

    2) Package Mo and Malik and a multitude of draft picks, swaps, or even young players in a trade for an instant impact player. One assumes Rob and Co. did their due diligence on this one, kicked many tires on many trades, and came away unimpressed with the return.

    3) Let then expire and rock free agency in a way only the Lakers can! I would have been fine with any of the above moves but I like this one best because it indicates what I think is a very important lesson learned: valuing continuity.

    I’m thinking back to what LeBron said about teams who beat us having more chemistry, being together longer, and us not having that extra something to fall back on. This is showing that the Lakers are building an actual NBA team and not just assembling talent. Any player we bring in with the exceptions or cap space we use can be traded as well as Malik and Mo could have been with the bonus being if we don’t trade them then we’ll start to build that chemistry The King was yearning for.

    As always team health will be the biggest factor but these subtle organizational choices give me a little more hope. Nice to see us continuing to pursue smart moves.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    2 Comments
  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    5 Things: Lakers Just Picking

    In a mildly surprising affair the Lakers elected to simply pick at their respective draft positions. In general the Draft was a quiet one with few surprises, few trades and nothing landscape altering. I think a lot of teams are using this grace season to measure how the cost of the team they’re fielding impacts winning, at least for the first few months. So, instead of trading our pick(s) or player(s) we simply did the picking.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wslR4YivLRk
    Yikes…wish I could say we’ve come a long way lol
    1. Jalen Hood-Schifino. Since I don’t watch college hoops I have no idea how this kid plays. Based on the various sources one could choose to peruse on the internet the obvious take-away is we drafted a big guard (6’6″) who can make plays out of the pick and roll, not very athletic, not a great finisher or shooter. So a defensive version of D’Angelo Russell. While not overwhelming (I was kind of surprised we didn’t draft the guy who went next, UCLA’s Jaime Jaquez Jr.) it’s hard to argue with a couple of things: the Lakers success in unearthing gems in the draft and our track record of developing young players into serviceable NBA players. While not every project turns out like Austin Reaves, if we can re-create the defensive wizardry we had in Alex Caruso (solid team defender with decent ball hawk skills) and turn the floaters and midrange pull ups into more polished drives to the rim and catch and shoot threes at a decent clip we might have nice complimentary player off the bench. To my eyes Jalen looks a little more like a project than an instant impact player but that’s generally what you get outside the top ten. He also could show us something in summer league and training camp we’re not expecting.
    2. Maxwell Lewis. A 6’11 PF/C with a lot of upside and questions about polish, focus and overall ceiling. Some drafts had him in the lottery, some in e the top 30, ultimately the Lakers swapped picks and paid some cash to move up a few spots to seemingly make sure they drafted him. He put up decent numbers but ona pretty awful college team. Not the best indicator of future NBA impact I expect Maxwell to primarily play with the G League affiliate for the most part next season, barring injuries. Like Jalen, I’m hoping our player development can get him to be more impactful on defense, clean up his decision-making and improve his overall game. he’ll also need to add some muscle, at 6’11 195 he’s going to get bounced and bullied out of position so I’m looking at a year or so down the line before his role is a meaningful one.
    3. Colin Castleton. Immediately after the draft concluded it was announced that the Lakers had signed Colin Castleton to a two-way deal. A rare 5 year senior with the Florida Gators the 23 year-old posted some solid numbers in his final collegiate season and could see some time early in the season if the Lakers don’t immediately trade for a backup big and Mo Bamba continues to remain outside the main rotation for Darvin Ham as he did, for the most part, since his arrival. While not possessing a wealth of upside at 23, this is a solid, low-risk move by the Lakers to add some needed size that could fill in as-is right now. Some people will want to point out the similarities to Austin Reaves but Reaves and his agent turned down signing with other teams, potentially, and fell out of the draft completely as a result. While a top 100 draft prospect I didn’t see many (any?) draft boards that had Colin as a selection.
    4. D’Moi Hodge. Another 5 year senior from Mizzou the one thing that jumps off the page when looking at this dude is 40% from three. Now, granted, that’s the short porch college three but his overall FG% of 47.7 is pretty solid for a college kid. At 6’4″ he can also play some defense so one has to start wondering how this guy didn’t end up getting drafted? Streaky shooting and playing the 3 when he probably out to be playing as a SG may have contributed to his fall. Other than 3’s he’s not the most elite scorer but that may also have been the role he was in as a college player on a team with a better college player on it. In the Lakers seemingly never-ending quest to find a decent three and D player we have landed on a project that could become just that in D’Moi. At 24 he’ll need to put it all together quicker than a lot of rookies if he wants to stick in the NBA.
    5. Alex Fudge. Another major project player who came out as a sophomore but probably, for the sake of his career, might have benefitted more from another year of college. Regardless the young man is going for it and the Lakers are giving him a shot with an exhibit-10 contract. At 6’8″ and weighing 194 lbs, Alex made his mark on defense and rebounding, two areas the Lakers are pretty good at developing young guys into a serviceable NBA role player. Not much of a scorer he feels like a more un-polished version of Jarred Vanderbilt.

    So welcome to all the new Lakers. None of them really strike me as “instant-impact” players but the Lakers need to continue to blend youth and experience as we begin to transition from the LeBron era to…whatever comes next. We have a pretty solid of polishing rough projects so here’s hoping that success continues. Speaking of LeBron, the news that he is “frustrated” with AD is all seemingly based off a Colin Cowherd podcast…from February. Also, based on their high five routine, everything looks fine. Still, I’ve long been of the opinion the Lakers should at least get feelers on what an AD trade could bring back. So, since it’s the NBA and “anything is possible” we’ll just have to see if anything comes of it but I kinda doubt it will.

    Read More
    Profile Photo liked this
    5 Comments
    • Good stuff Jamie. I think one of the reasons they stood Pat was the value. I had seen Jalen as high as 8 in the mocks and almost always in the lottery. One thing you didn’t mention about him was his passing ability. He was considered perhaps the best passer in the draft. I have watched some video on him dropping some pretty incredible dimes.

      • I also read that they are not concerned by his 3 point shooting. He shot .333 % in collage. They feel there is upside there as well. Rob compared him the Austin who shot .317 in his rookie year and .398 last year. They feel he has the same work ethic as Austin. Max Christie shot .319 in college and .41% last year so you never know. I would love it if the Lakers hired a quality shooting coach, not just for the kids but for Vando, AD and LeBron too.

        • I’m happy with this pick. I’m so tired of small guards. Give me a kid like Jalen who does appear to be a players with skill sets similar to Austin Reaves. Big guards who can defend is a better starting point to search for guards than just being able to shoot. I could see Jalen and Austin complementing each other on the court together

    • What’s really odd is the two picks went to 20-year olds who aren’t going to do anything to help right now but are both big, physical They’re just investments for the future and could even be included in upcoming trades.

      Then the two new two-ways are both 5-years of college older players who are ready to help right now. Castleton looks to be exactly what we need as a backup center. And Hodge is a 3&D player who actually shoots volume and plays great D.

      I’m almost more excited about the two two-way players. Be interesting to see if they can break into the rotation for a change. I do love the focus on defense and size.

      B+ to A- for the draft.

    • That is an oldie! But, who be grinnin?

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    Dodged the CP3 bullet…

    Whew

    Dodged the CP3 bullet…

    Read More
    1 Comment
    • GS needed to move Poole. That $$ was not going to be a wise investment this time next summer. Health going to be the Warriors #’s 1, 2, and 3 issues.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    Is there anything more unreasonably frenzied than the NBA off-season? Rumors both absurd and reasonable fly willy-nilly and all of it feels like, to quote Shakespeare, “sound and fury signifying nothing”.

    NOLA ain’t breaking up their “if they could only stay healthy” team.

    Maybe Beal gets traded but, honestly, who cares? Dude is overpaid and under-delivers. Never got the hype.

    As an “I only care about the Lakers” I generally am dismissive of all the scuttlebutt and hyperbole. Gets hard when you’re just hoping to hear some positive Lakers news.

    Anyhow, I’m still waiting for the actual CBA to be released so we can talk something of actual substance. Rumor Mill 2023-24 doesn’t do it for me.

    (Yawn)

    Is there anything more unreasonably frenzied than the NBA off-season? Rumors both absurd and reasonable fly willy-nilly and all of it feels like, to quote Shakespeare, “sound and fury signifying nothing”.

    NOLA ain’t breaking up their “if they could only stay healthy” team.

    Maybe Beal gets traded but, honestly, who cares? Dude is overpaid and under-delivers. Never got the hype.

    As an “I only care about the Lakers” I generally am dismissive of all the scuttlebutt and hyperbole. Gets hard when you’re just hoping to hear some positive Lakers news.

    Anyhow, I’m still waiting for the actual CBA to be released so we can talk something of actual substance. Rumor Mill 2023-24 doesn’t do it for me.

    Read More
    Profile Photo liked this
    3 Comments
    • Hang in there JS! : )

    • I feel you, Jamie. It’s going to be a long off-season.

    • Nanna always told us….”Consider the source”.

      None of these “experts” are reporting from 1st hand knowledge; they ain’t in “The Room Where It Happens”. They’re being spoon-fed their info by agents & GMs & others involved in the decision making process. So then you have to ask yourself…”Why?” And who benefits from this information (or dis-information) going public?

      I think I’ve reached the point where I’m tired of getting manipulated and simply don’t give a f<@k anymore.

      I don’t wanna hear about the labor..just show me the baby. Then I’ll let u know if he’s cute..or not. lmao

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    5 Things: The Offseason

    While the NBA Finals play out (congrats to Miami on avoiding the sweep, still got Denver in 6) the rest of the NBA has already turned it’s attention to the next campaign. Whether that be adjusting the roster, over-hauling a team, or rebuilding a coaching staff every franchise has a laundry list of questions that need answering and holes that need plugging. For the most popular sports franchise in hoops (and maybe all sport) that is true, as well. It’s hard to build a winner and even harder to build (or rebuild) a dynasty). Simply put the offseason game the NBA goes through can be wicked hard.

    1. The biggest offseason question is whether the Lakers should continue to build around AD and LeBron? While I have supported the idea of at least seeing what the return could be for a Davis trade there’s simply no way the Lakers will trade LeBron James (sorry Kyrie). Frankly, given his injuries and drop off from three, a return from Davis would likely be underwhelming. So stay the course and damn the torpedoes, FULL SPEED AHEAD!!! Now, with that being said, the shape of how we do that can be seen through a variety of facets. One thing that I believe has to be factored in is the continuing decline of LeBron James. That’s not to say he can’t put up a solid stat line, just the manner in which that happens is going to change more and more. What used to be elite efficiency will take a hit due to more jumpers being shot and fewer forays to the rim, especially in the regular season. Whether or not any of us believes LBJ still is an elite player is kind of besides the point now. He’ll be paid like one, will not perform like one (especially during the regular season) and the end is much closer than maybe some folks want it to be. For my part I’m kind of over the whole “behind the scenes machinations that seem to follow LeBron but I also know the Lakers will do all they can to make sure he retires in that purple and gold jersey so a Laker is sitting atop the “Most Points Scored All Time” record. When it comes to AD the refrain is” if he could just…” and then a variety of things can follow. Stay healthy, play like a true big man, make a delicious alfredo sauce. I think the Lakers and AD are sort of bound on the path forward together. Health and small decline in certain skills means you won’t get back what you paid and toss in that there aren’t a ton of available multi-tool big men out there likely to be available to us and you can start to see why the Lakers and AD are stuck in this marriage of convenience. I have now fully come back to the “AD needs to play the 4 if only in name” position. I think playing the 5, while it is certainly his best position when it comes to offensive rebounding and scoring in the paint where he’s elite, makes him more susceptible to fatigue injuries and bulking up in order to do so has robbed him of what was (for a big man) an elite first-step and jump shot. I could be wrong on all of that, maybe AD has simply regressed, but it’s hard to not look at the added weight (220 coming into the league, 253 last season and spoke openly about adding weight the last 2 seasons which have been injury-filled) and not start to think that 235-240 is more where he should top out. Again, I could be horribly wrong and less weight means nothing (we’re not talking a Zion-like issue, or at least I don’t think we are) but if AD and the Lakers are going to be together for the long haul it may behoove all parties to look at the issue of longevity and endurance from all possible angles.
    2. The point guard question. Everyone wants to take the ball out of LeBron’s hands. Even LeBron. Until he’s playing and then he has the ball in his hands. Better point guards than D’Angelo Russell have tried to co-exist with The King controlling the rock and they either flounder (Russ) or play second-fiddle and bail (KI). One reason I can see this working better as-is going forward is I have always believed that D-Lo was nothing close to a true point guard. I’ve always, and still, think of him as combo guard. He plays just as well off ball as on (maybe better depending on the defense) and he lacks the speed to truly break a defense down or collapse it in the paint. That works because what LeBron really doesn’t want to do is lead the fast break. If he can jog/semi-sprint on a leak out and finish, swell. If he can be the trailer and find his way to the rim for an easy dunk? Dope. I don’t think he’s too keen on grabbing the rebound and pushing it 70+ feet to create an easy bucket for a teammate, not like he used to be able to do. That being said the true need for the Lakers are multiple players who can rebound and lead a break and, incredibly, we already have grip of those players: Davis, Reaves, James, Vanderbilt, and Russell are all capable of leading the charge and making a great play in transition. LeBron will be the de facto PG in the half court, make no mistake. So toss out the ordinary needs of other teams, we need multiple combo players who can rebound and push. To that I have the Lakers letting Russell walk now and using that money in other areas. I have LeBron starting at the PG flanked by Reaves, Hachimura, Vanderbilt and Davis (with Vanderbilt playing the true role of the five) at least on the roster as-is. We’ll need to re-sign the cheaper (but comparable talent-wise) Dennis Schroder.
    3. Keep Malik Beasley and maybe even Mo Bamba. Value now? Low. Value at next season’s trade deadline? Much higher simply because, in the case of Malik, it’ll be $16.5 million in expiring salary and there will be a few teams (especially next season) who will want to get out from under long-term salary. For all his struggles there will be reason enough based simply on his overall numbers to take a flier on Beasley and potentially letting him walk and that applies to us, as well. The market for an elite shooter starts at $10 mil and caps out around $20 mil, Malik is right in that range. With a summer of cohesion, camp so he knows his role, and the coaches getting better acquainted with how out use him the Lakers should probably refrain from trading Malik unless it’s for a bonafide improvement. Mo Bamba is in the same boat but with an caveat: since his deal isn’t guaranteed the Lakers can either cut him and save $10 mil now, in camp, or a declining sum of that deal as the season goes on until January 7th when all contracts become guaranteed. That means, should we trade him, the best time could be when there’s about half his deal left un-guaranteed which represents a $5 million chunk of change that could be vaporized from a team’s cap space. No need to send a player back, just a TPE the Lakers can do with as they will (TPE’s count against the cap until they expire or are traded). My guess is we keep Malik and cut Mo simply to keep the cap manageable.
    4. R&R. Reaves and Rui. Depending on many factors, one of R&R could be priced off the Lakers. While I doubt anyone dumps a massive deal on Rui’s doorstep day one his $18 million cap hold will be a small issue until he signs a contract. If i were Rob I’d just sit back, sign both player’s QO’s and tell them we intend to match and let the market dictate the price to retain their services. Hard to see that going south the way it did with Ayton in Phoenix who played an entire season expecting a max offer that only came after they matched Indy’s offer. I suppose, in Rui’s case, you could make an initial offer but I believe he’ll still test free agency for a while. What happens with these two will shape a lot of our secondary moves as they are the two best players up for a new deal and the price tag to keep both may fuel a decision on guys like Schroder, D-Lo, Malik and Mo. I believe , like LakerTom and I’m sure many other fans here and abroad, that the Lakers will never go over that second tax apron. Not just because of the penalties associated with such an action but also because pf the Laker front office overarching philosophies on the subject of luxury taxes (as in they don’t want to pay them. Ever). I’m pretty sure the max offer Reaves can command is a total of $98 mil: “Whereas the Lakers are capped at giving Reaves a four-year contract worth $50-plus million outright, another team can go as high as $98.7 million. The max offer could include relatively modest salaries of $11.4 and $11.9 million in the first two years, but starting in Year 3 the payout would soar to $36.9 million.” (per Bleacher Report). Rob has said he’ll match up to 100 mil, which is basically saying he’ll match anything. If so, and we can retain Rui for something sensible, I think the Lakers set themselves up nicely for the rest of free agency.
    5. Guys I’d like to see the Lakers make an offer for/trade for. I’d love to see us acquire a bruising center that can allow AD to drop back to the 4 with more regularity. Especially if it means he gets his legs under him better for outside shots. Don’t need a stretch 5 if AD can get back to 33-35% from three. So, in that vein, I would love to see a Beasley for Steven Adams and Xavier Tillman plus filler (or cash) and I’d use 2 second round picks to grease those wheels (or a heavily protected FRP or a pick swap). Adams would be brought in essentially for the playoffs and Tillman would be brought in as a regular season minutes sponge. I really liked what I saw from Tillman in the Grizzlies series and I’d squelch the trade if memphis didn’t use their team option on him and make him an offer. Mongo beat me to it but I could see the lakers making the same offer they would to Dennis to Gabe Vincent who has played great in the playoffs. His career numbers don’t jump off the sheet but he’s been an integral part of their culture and winning mentality. For me that goes as far as shooting percentages or raw stats. Or I could see the Lakers offering Malik and Mo to Atlanta for Clint Capella and Saddiq Bey. Not sure if you could maybe nab a second rounder from the Hawks since we;re the one doing their cap sheet a favor. Anyone think orlando would trade Gary HArris and Bol Bol for Malik? Or if they’d take Malik and cash or Max Christie for Fultz? Me neither but I’d suss it out although the risk factor with Fultz seems really high (contract year baby!). The Lakers should certainly present one of LeBron’s old teammates with a reunion, just not irving. I’d kick the tires on what it would cost to bring Kevin Love to LA to finish his career a few blocks from UCLA. Again, like Adams, you’re basically ramping him up for the stretch run/playoffs and to spell AD for a few minutes every game. Just might be a cheaper option. If the Lakers do go the hard cap I hope we use our BAE on Lonnie Walker, can probably vet minimum Wenyan, again, or not (solid regular season minutes eater). Guys like Naz Reid should be given a call and I’d even see if we could swap Larry nance Jr. for Mo Bamba (but I doubt NOLA takes calls from us anymore…).

      At any rate, there are obviously a grip-ton of ways the roster can be tweaked around James, Davis, Vanderbilt, Christie and hopefully Reaves and Hachimura. The rest I can pretty much take or leave as I think there are or will be comparable players to be found on the market. One just has decide what continuity looks like with this squad. I wouldn’t even be taken aback if we just run it back as-is, although LeBron will gripe through his back channels for a couple weeks.

    All in all Rob did a solid job turning one big contract and some flotsam into a lot of smaller contracts and different flotsam. How he shapes this will be the true defining moment of all that happened this season. Looking forward to a wacky season and what will surely be one of the craziest trade deadlines in NBA history…in like a year.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    4 Comments
    • Great Fiver, Jamie.

      1. FULL SPEED AHEAD is the only smart path to take. I agree every move we take must reflect that LeBron is nearing the end. That means we need to start getting serious about functionally adding players who can reduce our reliance and dependency on James’ playmaking, rebounding, interior defense, etc.

      The game is already positionless basketball on offense but the positions you play are still the positions you can defend. Right now, that says LeBron is clearly now a power and not small forward.

      We’re also in agreement that AD should not just play center. That he can be the best center and the best power forward is a reason why he should be both depending on what works in each game’s matchups. Frankly, I think added weight limits athleticism and does increase the possibility and severity of injuries.

      2. POINT GUARD QUESTION. The multiple playmakers approach clearly makes sense for any team, even if you have LeBron James or Nikola Jokic. It’s again the positionless approach to the game. Five guys who can shoot, pass, rebound, screen, and defend.

      LeBron is not going to start at point guard because he can’t defend that position. He will be listed as a 3 but will play a 4. I also think he is going to take off a lot during the regular season next year so Lakers do need a true starting point guard.

      Will that be D’Angelo? I would not be surprised if they did not bring him back. They could let him walk and try to use the $12.2M NT MLE to sign Gabe Vincent. Saves money, allows them to bring back Reaves, Hachimura, and maybe even Schroder and Walker. Still need a back up center to protect the rim but could get that in the draft.

      3. BEASLEY AND BAMBA. I could see them keeping them until the trade deadline but if they’re going to opt to hard cap themselves, the Lakers need to cut salary. That means not exercising the $16M team option on Beasley or guaranteeing Bamba’s $10M. Or you renounce Schroder and Walker. I believe Lakers are going to hard cap themselves, bring everybody back, and draft players who can help now.

      4. REAVES AND RUI. I don’t see the Lakers losing either. They can match any offers and that’s what they will do. They’re back regardless of the cost. The only question for me is who does LeBron guard if Rui starts? Rui can only defend 4 and 5, same as LeBron, unless we are good enough that he can concentrate on defense and rebounding and not worry about scoring and playmaking,

      5. PROSPECT LIST. I do like the idea of trading with Grizzlies for Tillman to be our backup center, but Adams is way too expensive and cannot stretch the floor. I would prefer Brook Lopez or Myles Turner. I don’t want players surrounding LeBron and AD who cannot shoot.

      I would agree with the use of the NT MLE for Gabe Vincent and just waiving Dlo. Vincent and Reaves would be the best undrafted starting backcourt in the NBA. The other guy I would target with the BAE would be Trey Lyles, another Klutch client.

    • LT and Magic Man??

    • Nice post Jamie, my main concern with moving AD to the 4 has nothing to do with AD and everything to do with LeBron. At this stage of his career he has proven that he is no longer capable of guarding the perimeter except in short spurts. I don’t want him trying to keep up with wings in season 21. He has been most effective on the defensive end when he can hang back, call out defenses and help. You also now have less 3 point shooting with AD at the 4 and LeBron at the 3. This ain’t even 2020 LeBron. I think we are much better off with a decent back up center that can eat up 10 to 15 minutes a game.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    5 Things: And So It Ends

    What began as an imploding star creating a singularity that sucked the joy of basketball from the Lakers and their fans turned into a beacon of hope and ended with a sweep at the hands of the Denver Nuggets. We’ll get into the regular season on down the line, likely (for me anyhow) after the NBA Finals. For now I just want to look back at this game and series and what it heralds going forward.

    1. Same old story. Lakers hung in there, Denver found a way late to pull away and shut us down. A lot of that is just Jokic and Murray are locked in right now. Murray finds a way to hit big shots, Jokic finds a way to hit big shots AND make winning plays. Hard to overcome that from two players who are in sync. In the end the Nuggets were, by far, the better team to the degree that they should be the team that the rest of the NBA blueprints to try and beat or at least neutralize. Whether the Nuggets go all the way and bring Denver it’s first-ever title is another story, and one that largely depends on whether the Heat close it out against Boston tonight *I think they will). Both the Heat and Nuggets will then basically equal amounts of time off. Should be fun.
    2. The LeBron James question. When you have LeBron on the team he’s the dominant point of conversation, focus and attention from the outside world. It’s both a luxury and a cruse. A luxury in that it’s a kind of shield for the rest of the team from a lot of scrutiny and a curse in that they rely on him as a crutch far too often. Some of that is by LeBron’s own choices, which he could do better about owning up to. Some of that is just the way the NBA functions. I can understand James questioning the 82 game grind because any talk of retirement is surely about that and nothing else. Hard to see LeBron retiring after a sweep, honestly, dude has a lotta pride. Mongo also brought up a great point in that if anyone would want a retirement tour it would be The King. He’s under contract next season and I expect him to be a part of the Lakers.
    3. The Anthony Davis question. AD no-showed the first half, turned it on a bit in the second, and basically played like I expect him to at this point. This question got answered for me last season. The Lakers simply have to at least test the trade waters for Davis. Laker fans know the truth: Davis will never be “The Man”. Any idea of a torch passing or a throne ascended (insert parable as you choose) is nonsense and if you didn’t watch him no-show in the 3rd quarter or waste his elite defensive ability letting Aaron Gordon go off in game 4 (his primary defensive assignment after getting switched off of Jokic in favor of Rui Hachimura) then, frankly, you weren’t paying attention. Should LeBron retire the franchise will take a step back if Davis is crowned (without earning) the “alpha dog” title. He lacks the fire inside, and honestly that isn’t a knock. He’s an elite defend and a solid scorer but he needs someone else to help him. Like Pau Gasol before he can be an amazing complimentary superstar. I doubt he can lead a team to the NBA Finals as the featured, lead player on a team.
    4. The D-Lo question. This one is tricky as D-Lo can simply choose to play elsewhere. He owes the Lakers nothing, can decline a sign and trade and is free to pursue his destiny as he so chooses. One imagines, based on his comments, he will be looking for a large role on offense, installed as a starter (even in the playoffs) and money in the $30 mil range to start along with a few years tacked on. Russell presents as many questions as he does answers. He’s always been a combo guard, in my opinion, and can play off the ball as well as on. His defense has been a liability and continues to be. He’s also the second best point guard who will be available to sign this offseason so suitors could very well line up and offer comparable deals to the one we’d like to offer and better if we start with a low-ball offer. For the Lakers the issue is compounded by our cap space situation, or lack thereof. If he walks for nothing the Lakers will be hard-pressed to find talent that will replace what D-Lo brings, flaws and all. I think it’s imperative that the Lakers do their best to retain D-Lo simply for the sake of not taking that cap hit. He can be traded if we get into the season and it’s just not working out. We saw that with Russ, you can trade guys almost no matter what. It might cost a draft pick or something but it cam be done.
    5. The Lakers as a whole gave it everything they had. Should Darvon have challenged the out of bounds call when Murray fell? probably. Could LeBron have dropped the ball off to Reaves after the inbounds play where he flung up a wild step back fadeaway from 20? Of course. Would Anthony Davis have made that wid3e open three as time expired. Maybe. The season though acme down more to a team that was coming together on the fly led by an aging superstar and an inconsistent cohort getting beat by a cohesive unit that knew where it wanted to go and how it wanted to get there. Reaves and Hachimura did everything asked of them and more. Russell acquiesced to come off the bench and still found ways to contribute (whether it was a meaty or meager contribution is up for debate). Guys were in and out of the rotation and stayed ready (looking at Vand-o and Tristan Thompson here). My point is that this team overcame a helluvalot to get to this point and was a few bad breaks going their way from meeting this challenge. While it may not work out to keep everyone on the roster we hope will stay or would like to see return I think the Laker FO will at least kick the tires on that scenario. One does wonder what a solid camp and offseason of growth together would help to build. In Denver we’re seeing what building as opposed to re-inventing the team can do for you. Here’s hoping that Rob was paying attention, too.

    Lot of shout outs and positives to look at and some questionable things and moments as well. So much of success in sport is built on camaraderie. This team seemed to like playing together. The NBA, being the business that it is, can be unforgiving so we’ll see if the future holds a Laker team building off of success or trying to, yet again, re-invent itself over a summer. I know what I’m hoping for. Go Lakers.

    Read More
  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    Great season everyone. Loved how this team fought. Plenty to unpack later.

    Helluva Run

    Great season everyone. Loved how this team fought. Plenty to unpack later.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    2 Comments
    • Hope we can all agree upon that. Went far further than we expected. Lots of good things to be grateful for. Hell of a run.

    • Nightmare, to dream, back to reality. The team was never really well constructed and the late additions could only help them get so far. Went from arguably the worst Lakers season to one of the most memorable. Hats off to them for getting as far as they did and not just rolling over to a superior opponent.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    Reality has begun to sink in. Three things are true:

    -At the start of the season I picked the Nuggets to go all the way (with the Heat coming out of the East, I believe but I’ll have to go back and listen to that podcast to be sure).

    -After the trade and the first two series my Laker Fan Goggles convinced me the new-look Lakers could take Denver in 6 games with the only swap being we’d win game 2 in Denver after adjusting to the altitude.

    -My Laker Goggles were wrong and my mind was spot on to start the season. Up until the playoffs I didn’t see anyone stopping Denver…except the Lakers and the Heat, maybe Boston if they could get Tatum to be consistent (they have not). It’s not what most of planet Earth wants but it looks like they’re gonna get Denver-Miami.

    Anyhow, the game.
    1) Lakers continued to have no answer to Jamal Murray. Over two quarters and two different games Murray went absolutely bonkers against the kitchen sink the Lakers threw at him torching us for 53 points. The tandem between Murray and Jokic reminds me a lot of the Pau-Kobe Konnection but less lopsided. Either player is comfortable sliding into the alpha role and then again back out of it, acquiescing to the other’s greatness without ego.
    2) Lakers thought they had Jokic in a box, didn’t take advantage of it, then he broke out of the box. Through 3 quarters Jokic looked fairly pedestrian and our chances of getting back into the series looked pretty good. Then the 4th quarter came, he had plenty left in the tank unlike in Denver when he ceded the spotlight to Murray, and he finished us off in game 4 flipping Denver’s script mildly enough for the Lakers, again, to have no answer.
    3) The Denver Nuggets, as a whole, are deeper and better than the Lakers. The core of the Nuggets (Joker, Jamal, MPJ) have been together for 5 seasons and through a lot together. Aaron Gordon and KCP were dynamite pick ups for them. Bruce Brown has been stellar. Their bench, even though it has been outscored in most games by our bench, has had more of an overall impact on the game. Points are but one facet of the jewel that makes up an NBA game. The Nuggets have simply been the better team in the facets that matter the most: grit, clutch scoring, poise, and execution under pressure.
    4) D-Lo shrinking big time. Even the ESPN announcers were saying Russell had become un-playable. His three point shot has left the series, his defense has always been questionable (at best), and when he’s not scoring he doesn’t find other ways to contribute. He’s a series defining -53, which only tells part of the futility tale. I have never been sold on D-Lo, dude can make shots but lacks that killer mentality you want in one of your top 3 players. Post game he himself had no answers which never bodes well. Feels like he could go full 1-2-3 Cancun on us in game 4 a la Nick “Wasn’t Long For the Team After That” Van Exel. He could do a lot by coming out a lot more aggressive in game 4 and make the Nuggets think about guarding him more but no matter what adjustment he and the staff come up with it’s likely too little, too late.
    5) Coach Ham’s rookie status is showing. In my opinion Michael Malone is one of the 3 best coaches in the NBA. Without pissing anyone off he has managed a core group through injuries, role adjustments, an MVP unable to get as far as they have this season and all in the tough Western Conference. You could have heard a pin drop when the Nuggets won the #1 seed in the west, so little was the fanfare. Same went for every team they dispatched in the playoffs. Evidently, when people ask for “what historical games” proof of the Nuggets ability to win they forget that it actually took historical games from both Durant and Brooks to get that to 7 games. We ain’t come close to matching what Phoenix brought to their series. Maybe beating the Lakers will elevate their rep, and winning a title would certainly cement both Malone’s and Jokic’s greatness, but I kind of doubt it. They’ll say the same things they did about Miami getting to the NBA Finals in the Bubble or some such silliness. I’m not fooled, the Nuggets are kicking our ass and might go all the way.

    Should have never believed in those Laker Goggles. FWIW I’d like to see what this team, as-is for the most part, can do with a pre-season and 82 games to come together. The chemistry of the Nuggets is showing as much as their talent. Frankly, at this stage, it ain’t about talent. Everyone has talent at this point of the playoffs. It comes down to intangibles things that just don’t show up in the box score. In a lot of ways the Lakers are now built incorrectly, as well. We’re built for LeBron and AD to carry the majority of the load on both ends and they’re simply not up to the task, especially James. Not anymore. My big fear is he ends up getting surgery on that foot this summer, it’s obviously affecting his jump shot and has since he came back from whatever rehab he did before the season ended.

    Same for AD. There’s a part of me that thinks it’d be best for both to get whatever issues they have in their feet fixed as best they can. There’s another part of me that knows that, if they go that route, the Lakers are basically done for the next 5-6 years unless they luck into a star or someone forces their way here.

    I’m not too bummed, honestly, still got a game to work with and make this interesting. Win at Crypto tomorrow and see what you can do in Denver. Would like to avoid a sweep but Laker History tells us a sweep is actually the most likely (the Lakers have never forced a game 5 hen down 3-0). There will be a more positive post talking about what this team was able to accomplish post-trade deadline but for now we’re dealing with where we’re at.

    I guess this wasn’t so short, lol…

    Mercifully Quick 5er

    Reality has begun to sink in. Three things are true:

    -At the start of the season I picked the Nuggets to go all the way (with the Heat coming out of the East, I believe but I’ll have to go back and listen to that podcast to be sure).

    -After the trade and the first two series my Laker Fan Goggles convinced me the new-look Lakers could take Denver in 6 games with the only swap being we’d win game 2 in Denver after adjusting to the altitude.

    -My Laker Goggles were wrong and my mind was spot on to start the season. Up until the playoffs I didn’t see anyone stopping Denver…except the Lakers and the Heat, maybe Boston if they could get Tatum to be consistent (they have not). It’s not what most of planet Earth wants but it looks like they’re gonna get Denver-Miami.

    Anyhow, the game.
    1) Lakers continued to have no answer to Jamal Murray. Over two quarters and two different games Murray went absolutely bonkers against the kitchen sink the Lakers threw at him torching us for 53 points. The tandem between Murray and Jokic reminds me a lot of the Pau-Kobe Konnection but less lopsided. Either player is comfortable sliding into the alpha role and then again back out of it, acquiescing to the other’s greatness without ego.
    2) Lakers thought they had Jokic in a box, didn’t take advantage of it, then he broke out of the box. Through 3 quarters Jokic looked fairly pedestrian and our chances of getting back into the series looked pretty good. Then the 4th quarter came, he had plenty left in the tank unlike in Denver when he ceded the spotlight to Murray, and he finished us off in game 4 flipping Denver’s script mildly enough for the Lakers, again, to have no answer.
    3) The Denver Nuggets, as a whole, are deeper and better than the Lakers. The core of the Nuggets (Joker, Jamal, MPJ) have been together for 5 seasons and through a lot together. Aaron Gordon and KCP were dynamite pick ups for them. Bruce Brown has been stellar. Their bench, even though it has been outscored in most games by our bench, has had more of an overall impact on the game. Points are but one facet of the jewel that makes up an NBA game. The Nuggets have simply been the better team in the facets that matter the most: grit, clutch scoring, poise, and execution under pressure.
    4) D-Lo shrinking big time. Even the ESPN announcers were saying Russell had become un-playable. His three point shot has left the series, his defense has always been questionable (at best), and when he’s not scoring he doesn’t find other ways to contribute. He’s a series defining -53, which only tells part of the futility tale. I have never been sold on D-Lo, dude can make shots but lacks that killer mentality you want in one of your top 3 players. Post game he himself had no answers which never bodes well. Feels like he could go full 1-2-3 Cancun on us in game 4 a la Nick “Wasn’t Long For the Team After That” Van Exel. He could do a lot by coming out a lot more aggressive in game 4 and make the Nuggets think about guarding him more but no matter what adjustment he and the staff come up with it’s likely too little, too late.
    5) Coach Ham’s rookie status is showing. In my opinion Michael Malone is one of the 3 best coaches in the NBA. Without pissing anyone off he has managed a core group through injuries, role adjustments, an MVP unable to get as far as they have this season and all in the tough Western Conference. You could have heard a pin drop when the Nuggets won the #1 seed in the west, so little was the fanfare. Same went for every team they dispatched in the playoffs. Evidently, when people ask for “what historical games” proof of the Nuggets ability to win they forget that it actually took historical games from both Durant and Brooks to get that to 7 games. We ain’t come close to matching what Phoenix brought to their series. Maybe beating the Lakers will elevate their rep, and winning a title would certainly cement both Malone’s and Jokic’s greatness, but I kind of doubt it. They’ll say the same things they did about Miami getting to the NBA Finals in the Bubble or some such silliness. I’m not fooled, the Nuggets are kicking our ass and might go all the way.

    Should have never believed in those Laker Goggles. FWIW I’d like to see what this team, as-is for the most part, can do with a pre-season and 82 games to come together. The chemistry of the Nuggets is showing as much as their talent. Frankly, at this stage, it ain’t about talent. Everyone has talent at this point of the playoffs. It comes down to intangibles things that just don’t show up in the box score. In a lot of ways the Lakers are now built incorrectly, as well. We’re built for LeBron and AD to carry the majority of the load on both ends and they’re simply not up to the task, especially James. Not anymore. My big fear is he ends up getting surgery on that foot this summer, it’s obviously affecting his jump shot and has since he came back from whatever rehab he did before the season ended.

    Same for AD. There’s a part of me that thinks it’d be best for both to get whatever issues they have in their feet fixed as best they can. There’s another part of me that knows that, if they go that route, the Lakers are basically done for the next 5-6 years unless they luck into a star or someone forces their way here.

    I’m not too bummed, honestly, still got a game to work with and make this interesting. Win at Crypto tomorrow and see what you can do in Denver. Would like to avoid a sweep but Laker History tells us a sweep is actually the most likely (the Lakers have never forced a game 5 hen down 3-0). There will be a more positive post talking about what this team was able to accomplish post-trade deadline but for now we’re dealing with where we’re at.

    I guess this wasn’t so short, lol…

    Read More
    Profile Photo liked this
    2 Comments
    • I think part of our problem is fatigue. We just have not had the energy to close out games. No way LeBron should be playing 43 minutes. Same goes for AD. They each have played 40 or more minutes throughout the playoffs and it’s catching up to them. We have had to play with playoff intensity since the trade deadline. Denver began resting guys in March. Hopefully we can pull one out Monday and avoid the sweep. I’m okay with the season if we do lose. We really exceeded all my expectations.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    Play the same way we have and this won’t be pretty. We’ve seen what a lack of 48 minute focus and intensity has done to Boston. Lakers want to change this sad story they gotta do it tonight. We are not a pretty team, we are not a jump shooting team, we are a heavy weight boxer that pummels their opponent with body blows. If we don’t accept that we will lose. Lose and we might get swept. Get swept and a lot of good things that have happened will be easy to overlook. I think a lot of these guys should be Lakers going forward but I suspect Rob and Co. might think differently. Win, win again, the pressure will high for everyone. The higher the pressure the more I think it favors LBJ and AD but that means winning tonight.

    No Settling

    Play the same way we have and this won’t be pretty. We’ve seen what a lack of 48 minute focus and intensity has done to Boston. Lakers want to change this sad story they gotta do it tonight. We are not a pretty team, we are not a jump shooting team, we are a heavy weight boxer that pummels their opponent with body blows. If we don’t accept that we will lose. Lose and we might get swept. Get swept and a lot of good things that have happened will be easy to overlook. I think a lot of these guys should be Lakers going forward but I suspect Rob and Co. might think differently. Win, win again, the pressure will high for everyone. The higher the pressure the more I think it favors LBJ and AD but that means winning tonight.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    3 Comments
    • That’s more like it. I believe the Lakers will come out and do just that. How about you?

    • Lakers are favored by 5.5 points. In my younger days, I would have bet an uncomfortable amount of money that we win Game 3 by double digits. Also that we’ll have a free throw advantage in the high-teens. Nobody outside of Colorado wants to see this thing go 3-0.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    5 Things: Lakers Falter Down the Stretch

    It seemed like we could do it. It felt like we kind of had the game under control at the start of the 4th quarter. The prospect of going back to LA with the series tied 1-1 seemed legit. As the 4th quarter unfolded that prospect got dimmer and dimmer with every missed three by LA (specifically LeBron James) and every made three by Jamal Murray. As a result the Lakers fly to LA down 2-0 and looking for answers.

    1. Murray even better in the 4th in game 2. This doesn’t seem like a mystery to me. The Nuggets look to have Jokic dominate the first 3 quarters and then let Murray loose in the closing frame. It worked in game 1 when, despite playing with 5 fouls for most of the 4th quarter, Murray went off for 17 4th quarter points and buried the Lakers as LeBron couldn’t match him shot for shot. Two days later Murray went off even more and the Lakers were somehow caught off guard…again. This is not rocket science, the Lakers need to figure out the 4th quarter defensive game plan for this Nuggets team like yesterday.
    2. Bad shots on tired legs. I can live with the threes from LeBron…when they’re the flow of things. He hasn’t shot many of those for a lot of the playoffs. Most of them feel like poorly timed, and shot, heat checks. Are some close to going in? Sure, maybe? But the fact is they’re not. He hasn’t made a 4th quarter three since the Memphis series. He’s 0-fer in this series in any quarter, and he’s shooting a dreadful and team-killing 23% from three overall. People spent a lotta time up Russell Westbrook’s ass, raking him over the coals, bemoaning his lack of accuracy but poor connection rate. One would expect (but won’t get) the same vitriol regarding James’ abysmal shooting.. The Lakers are far and away a better team when they do not jack up threes like the rest of the league seems addicted to. The Lakers should top out at 20-25 3PT FGAs/game unless someone is actually making them and last night nobody but Reaves was. In clutch moments in both game 1 and game 2 LeBron’s poor shot selection and inability to make a shot from distance has killed our 4th quarter mojo. We won’t even get into the multiple blown dunks and layups that could have also meant the difference in this game, suffice to say The King has never looked more human than against Denver in this series.
    3. D’Angelo watching money slip away in this series. As good as he was in a couple games against Memphis and a game or two against Golden State one has to consider the playoffs as a bad showcase for what D-Lo can do. He’s certainly playing with less and less aggression as the playoffs go forward as all of his numbers have dipped in each series across the board to the point he’s essentially an overpaid non-factor, so far. His talent is real but one has to question both his drive and his mental fortitude after another blasé playoff showing in what has become the norm. The outliers are the games where he does well, is that a player the Lakers want to keep at the price tag he’s likely to command? I’m starting to doubt it.
    4. Coach Ham getting outcoached by a wide margin. The Lakers seem to have no answer for the Denver high screen and roll. It’s not a special or an amazing play, literally every team runs it. But we can’t seem to fight through them, and when we slip under we give up wide open threes which Denver is canning when it counts. It’s not just Jokic and Murray. It’s Murray and MPJ and even Aaron Gordon shaking free for rim runs as the Lakers dither behind the screen seemingly flummoxed by the action. Nobody is blowing this play up and for all the praise AD got in how he was able to cover back to Golden State shooters on plays like this he’s seemingly now incapable of it one series later. Same with Schroeder who has gotten the bulk of the defensive assignment on Murray. Dennis looks like he’s gassed after the gauntlet of screens he’s navigated thus far and is dying on the screen more often rather than fighting through. Credit the Nuggets, they are hitting some impressive shots at times, but also the Lakers need to get into the body more of both the screener and the guy coming off it and force the issue a little more. The Lakers have not been the more physical team, thus far, and have let Denver dictate both pace and physicality. That speaks to a lack of minutes for Vando, in my opinion.
    5. Reasons to hope. Reaves and Rui are balling out, D-Lo plays better at home, the law of averages dictates LeBron James will make at least one more three pointer before the season concludes, and AD plays great in odd games. Problem is the margin for error has now shrunk to basically zero. Need to stay unbeaten at home in the playoffs and come back to Denver with a winner takes all mentality and follow it up with a “don’t let the zombie walk again” mentality in game 6. I don’t have high hopes for a game 7 win. AD can’t have another bad game until the 2023-24 season. D-Lo needs to play like he cares what happens. LeBron needs to operate from the elbow to the baseline for the majority of the game. The Lakers need to figure out the Nuggets high screen and roll.

    Getting dicey now, altitude will be an issue in game’s 5 and 7, should it come to it and we likely let our best chance to take back home court last night. It can still be done, just got a lot harder is all. Go Lakers.

    Read More
    Profile Photo liked this
    1 Comment
    • Just like to add some facts that will not change. Joker is 28 and LBJ is 38. Murray is 26 and AD is 31 and beat up. No excuses, like age, for DLO, Walker, and Schro! So what we really are saying is that LBJ cannot play 40 minutes a game and without him we cannot win. I got that.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    A lotta these are going to be the same in any series and that’s because, at it’s core, winning basketball comes down to managing the same few things.

    1) Control the glass (whoops in game 1). It is crucial we rectify the outrageous rebounding differential we endured in game 1. Especially on the offensive glass. One and done has to be the way forward. Anything else and we don’t have a chance.

    2) Pick your poison with Jokic. His 34 points we can absorb. It’s when those also come along with over 10 assists meaning he was responsible for (at a minimum) 62 points and probably more. Honestly it’s probably closer, if not over, 70. One man cannot create 70 points/game and we expect to win. Gotta keep that number under 60. I’d prefer he score 45-50 and have 5 or 6 dimes because that means the Denver attack is less multi-faceted.

    3) Don’t let Murray shoot over 50% from anywhere. Another “whoops in game 1” as Murray shot 12-20 overall, and 4-8 from three. Now one of those was a H.O.R.S.E. shot that I would dare him to make again but the fact remains we left him wide open far too often and he got to the rim far too easily. Is this a byproduct of the attention and defensive focus that The Joker creates? Absolutely but we can, and must, do better.

    4) Our team has to be better than their team. AD and LBJ will, essentially, cancel out Jokic and Murray. That means the rest of the Lakers have to beat the rest of the Nuggets and they didn’t show up until it was too late. Other than Rui nobody had significant impact off the bench, D-Lo and Schorder combined for 14 points on 6-14 shooting (mostly D-Lo’s fault but Schroder was not aggressive enough going at anyone on Tuesday and wasn’t the defensive factor that off-set his lack of scoring punch). We won our other series by getting solid overall production from the starting 5 and someone off the bench stepped up big in the wins. That’s the formula we need to continue to embrace.|

    5) Continue to adapt. We saw a late-game adjustment almost work and if LeBron takes it to the hole against Murray instead of settling for herky-jerky threes and trying to draw a silly foul we may be talking differently. Maybe we start Rui, maybe we start Lonnie for a little more size and speed to start and swap Hachimura onto Jokic situationally. We definitely need players on the floor who will crash the glass and, frankly, that’s not either D-Lo or Dennis. They stand and wait for the ball to bounce to them and we need guys getting their feet off the floor and crashing the glass. The Nuggets will likely have already figured out a decent counter to Hachimura on The Joker (and a lot of that success was also the dude probably got a little gassed by the 4th quarter). We can’t always do a rope-a-dope and come out heavy in the 4th. We need to come out punching better at the start and maintain that ferocity. Everyone should be adjusted to the altitude by now, that’s a crappy excuse anyhow. Lakers need to start with fire, not find it when it suits them.

    The 5er I never got to drop

    A lotta these are going to be the same in any series and that’s because, at it’s core, winning basketball comes down to managing the same few things.

    1) Control the glass (whoops in game 1). It is crucial we rectify the outrageous rebounding differential we endured in game 1. Especially on the offensive glass. One and done has to be the way forward. Anything else and we don’t have a chance.

    2) Pick your poison with Jokic. His 34 points we can absorb. It’s when those also come along with over 10 assists meaning he was responsible for (at a minimum) 62 points and probably more. Honestly it’s probably closer, if not over, 70. One man cannot create 70 points/game and we expect to win. Gotta keep that number under 60. I’d prefer he score 45-50 and have 5 or 6 dimes because that means the Denver attack is less multi-faceted.

    3) Don’t let Murray shoot over 50% from anywhere. Another “whoops in game 1” as Murray shot 12-20 overall, and 4-8 from three. Now one of those was a H.O.R.S.E. shot that I would dare him to make again but the fact remains we left him wide open far too often and he got to the rim far too easily. Is this a byproduct of the attention and defensive focus that The Joker creates? Absolutely but we can, and must, do better.

    4) Our team has to be better than their team. AD and LBJ will, essentially, cancel out Jokic and Murray. That means the rest of the Lakers have to beat the rest of the Nuggets and they didn’t show up until it was too late. Other than Rui nobody had significant impact off the bench, D-Lo and Schorder combined for 14 points on 6-14 shooting (mostly D-Lo’s fault but Schroder was not aggressive enough going at anyone on Tuesday and wasn’t the defensive factor that off-set his lack of scoring punch). We won our other series by getting solid overall production from the starting 5 and someone off the bench stepped up big in the wins. That’s the formula we need to continue to embrace.|

    5) Continue to adapt. We saw a late-game adjustment almost work and if LeBron takes it to the hole against Murray instead of settling for herky-jerky threes and trying to draw a silly foul we may be talking differently. Maybe we start Rui, maybe we start Lonnie for a little more size and speed to start and swap Hachimura onto Jokic situationally. We definitely need players on the floor who will crash the glass and, frankly, that’s not either D-Lo or Dennis. They stand and wait for the ball to bounce to them and we need guys getting their feet off the floor and crashing the glass. The Nuggets will likely have already figured out a decent counter to Hachimura on The Joker (and a lot of that success was also the dude probably got a little gassed by the 4th quarter). We can’t always do a rope-a-dope and come out heavy in the 4th. We need to come out punching better at the start and maintain that ferocity. Everyone should be adjusted to the altitude by now, that’s a crappy excuse anyhow. Lakers need to start with fire, not find it when it suits them.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    3 Comments
    • Lakers are going to start Rui Hachimura instead of Dennis Schroder with Rui being primary defender of Nikola Jokic. Ham will mirror AD and Rui with Joker’s minutes.

      • Nice post Jamie, I think the Lakers will mix up the coverages on the Joker. You will see Rui, AD, maybe Lebron at times, he’s the strongest guy in the game. They may even dust Thompson off for a few minutes. I don’t think you can give the Joker a steady diet of any one coverage. He will eventually figure it out. TNT had a good point. You can’t let him dribble the ball up. You can let him walk into an action. They also mentioned putting him in pick and rolls as much as possible. You want to wear him down. He can block some shots but over all he is not a good defender.

      • Nice post Jamie, I think the Lakers will mix up the coverages on the Joker. You will see Rui, AD, maybe Lebron at times, he’s the strongest guy in the game. They may even dust Thompson off for a few minutes. I don’t think you can give the Joker a steady diet of any one coverage. He will eventually figure it out. TNT had a good point. You can’t let him dribble the ball up. You can let him walk into an action. They also mentioned putting him in pick and rolls as much as possible. You want to wear him down. He can block some shots but over all he is not a good defender.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    Had issues logging in but now I’m back.

    Solid game against Denver, need to compete better on the glass and I like Rui on Joker.

    I’m back!

    Had issues logging in but now I’m back.

    Solid game against Denver, need to compete better on the glass and I like Rui on Joker.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    4 Comments
  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    5 Things: Being A Pro

    So much of the playoffs is a mind game. Not letting the crowd get you down, the refs knock you off your game, and keeping your head on straight if you find yourself out of a shortened playoff rotation. The Warriors weak point has always been their emotional players (Draymond, Klay, and Poole in this era) and those cracks showed last night. In the 3rd quarter they made their patented “we got this” series of baskets pulling away for a double-digit lead. The Lakers had an answer and it resulted in what can only be described as the best quarter of Lonnie Walker the IV’s life.

    1. Lonnie Walker the Fourth. I’ve been low-key posting and hoping for Lonnie to get minutes over Malik Beasley. Then we stopped playing Malik and I was low-key hoping we’d at least see what LW4 could do with Troy Brown Jr’s time. I like TBJ, don’t get me wrong, he’s got three point range and plays decent D. I felt (and still feel) that since we promoted Reaves to the starting 5 the bench has lacked oompf. Scoring, athleticism, and mojo. Enter Lonnie. The first thing you have to do is give the man a ton of credit for staying ready both in terms of his game but also in terms of what the Lakers a re doing game-to-game and being ready to contribute where asked. Few players have that maturity, especially guys who are probably wondering where the next paycheck will be coming from and how many zeroes it may or may not have. In one quarter Lonnie re-inserted himself into the debate of “Which Lakers Do We Keep?” we’ll go around endlessly this summer. He also made history as he made a record shared only by Kobe Bryant by dropping 15 in the 4th on the Warriors.
    2. Though it be dwindling we still won the free throw battle. 20-20 is getting it done and we needed all of those points in the face of Curry’s one-man onslaught on our defense. Steph dropped a triple-double, was picking our defense apart and had Klay shot better or Poole showed up at all, this game likely swings Golden State’s way. As it stands his effort will show upas another playoff ‘L’ and the defending champs are now on the proverbial ropes. Still, takes a mighty swing to knock out the champs and the Lakers need to bring the thunder to Chase Center. Expect that free throw number to go down even more in game 5.
    3. D’Angelo Russell got bailed out. Lost among LW4’s heroics was an absolute stinker of a game from D-Lo. 1-10, 0-4 from three and an overall middling game, D-Lo must have been stoked to see Lonnie match Steph shot for shot in the 4th and the resultant win as it will forever cover over a game that could have been dissected endlessly if the Lakers had lost home court advantage and possibly the series. Still think D-Lo makes a ton of sense to keep, this is an early stage of his playoff career and he’s finding his own way as much as anyone not named James or Davis.
    4. For us to lose the three point line battle and the points in the paint battle and still come away with a win is something special. They played a better overall game than us, honestly, it just came down to who made shots in the 4th and the Warriors felt that sphincter tighten up a bit, except Steph, and could not rise to the moment on the road. Game 4 is often looked at as the pivotal game (although the Lakers famously won game 4 against Phoenix only to get swept out of the last 3 games a decade or so ago so anything is possible) but we’ll need to play a lot better if we want to close this out in the Bay Area. We won’t pull this same game out at Chase Center. We need to take even better care of the ball and make a few more shots in the doing. The 11 extra points generated by The Stripe will not be available on the road, methinks.
    5. LeBron and AD dominating. Hard to do a fiver of last night’s games and not mention the two stalwarts who made Lonnie’s heroics possible. LeBron still hasn’t had a dramatic scoring game in a win, yet, and AD got more shots off than normal. Only went to the line 3 times and still scored 23 (without taking a three pointer) so he had his overall game working. LBJ and AD are showing that, when they are healthy enough to play, they still form a dominant and hard to beat duo in a 7 game series. Between them and Coach ham’s sublime adjustments and rotation moves the Lakers are on the verge of proving a lot of doubters (like myself), haters (like a lot of planet Earth), and talking heads wrong. I don’t know what team has ever started 2-10 and made it to the conference finals but the Lakers a re 1 win from establishing that as thing that has been done. Need to complete the job ASAP and get to resting LeBron, AD and the rest of the James Gang.

    I expect Steve to try and speed the game up even more with his younger guys, still haven’t seen a dominant game from Wiggins yet and Klay is always just waiting to erupt. The Lakers need to steel themselves for a little of all of the above, keep their composure and poise (which has definitely been an advantage) and just keep competing at a high level. Do that and I like our chances of winning 1 of the next 2 games and possibly even close it out on the road. Go Lakers.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    4 Comments
    • EXcellent fiver, Jamie. Getting harder and harder not to be optimistic about this team and their chances.

      Adding Lonnie to the rotation was a huge move and, as you pointed out, should help replace Reaves scoring for the bench. Lakers proving they, not the Warriors, are the deeper team with more player who can give you a win on a given day.

      LeBron being free to figure out what we need to win is going to become one of this team’s huge strengths. Loved how James became the point guard in the fourth and willed the Lakers to dominate that last 3 minutes.

      Warriors are learning that this Lakers team is much better than they thought. What they’re watching is a team that’s getting better each game and each series. Last series, they couldn’t close the Grizzlies in 5. Tomorrow night, they will close the Dubs in 5.

      • There’s no doubt it all starts and ends with LBJ and AD but having the potential of up to 5 different guys who can step into a scoring void and push us over the top is a huge luxury. Where the Warriors have specialized guys at a lot of positions we have more dynamic players who can fill out a couple different roles and those permutations are going to be tough for any team to stop altogether. Sometimes guys will miss shots or we won’t get to the line enough to offset our poor three point shooting. But it’s hard to see that happening over an entire 7 game series. It could, in theory, and every round just gets harder, but this team is showing a lot of heart right now.

        • Nice post Jamie, I think the next game we need to just stay attached into the stretch and let LeBron orchestrate. The Warriors will probably score more this game, so will have to score more as well. They will hit more 3’s. While can’t win a 3 point shoot out, we will need to do better than 24%. And if the Warriors go tiny again we need to get AD the ball more than we did in the 2nd half. They don’t have an answer for him.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    5 Things: Lakers Go Up 2-1

    The Lakers returned to Crypto on Saturday after a major league drubbing in game 2 at Chase Center. The Warriors have won everywhere in every scenario, riding a stellar game of shooting from everyone, and boasting a healthy roster. The game was over by halftime. The Lakers defense and style of play, especially at home, was just too much for the Warriors defense to overcome. What adjustment they can make is the question now.

    1. Get up for game 3. There can be no sleepwalking, there can be no taking a quarter or a half off. We must come with another elite effort and keep on winning at home. The Lakers need to get excellent and stay excellent at 2 things: winning a game on the road in the playoffs and defending home court. To date the Lakers have done both and they need to maintain that level of focus and execution. The body will not be ready, you will be feeling fatigue. That’s where the mind comes into it and the Lakers need to be mentally sharp and rise to the challenge of going up 3-1.
    2. Lonnie Walker’s big game. I’m not talking about his stat line, especially pre-garbage time, I’m talking about his appearance in the first half when he came in when Troy Brown normally does. He didn’t try and light it up, he didn’t force his shot, and he didn’t loaf on D. he did his job, he’s been an incredible professional (especially since the trade deadline when his minutes all but evaporated) and he has stayed ready and in sync with what the team is doing. He may not be a Laker next season but I can honestly say I am now a big Lonnie Walker the Fourth fan. I don’t know what role he has consistently on this team, especially during the playoffs, but the level of maturity and team before me LW4 has shown is really impressive.
    3. LeBron taking less is more. 2-4 from three and he didn’t shoot the ball once in the first quarter, or the first 4 minutes of the second? That should be a recipe for Lakers disaster but it wasn’t. It gave D-Lo the room to start the game like a star exploding. It gave the Warriors a defensive problem because they know he can’t play decoy the whole game so they still had to have at least a body leaning his way, often two in the vicinity. It also saved him for an incredible stretch in the 2nd and 3rd quarters where he orchestrated the demise of Golden State in game 3 with an efficiency we haven’t really seen from him the playoffs until Saturday night.
    4. AD wakes up. I know what he’s been saying, that he doesn’t play any differently from one game to another. The eye-test tells a different tale. More FGA’s in the paint than from outside. More engaged on D. A better player. Maybe it took him a film session to see how they switched up their coverage? Maybe he ate a better breakfast? Who knows and who cares, we just need that version of AD tonight…and as I’ve said a grip of times…in every game going forward.
    5. Pound the paint and don’t stop doing it. Every settle-for jumper, every early shot clock three, every shot that isn’t a kick-out off a drive is a bad shot for this Laker squad in the playoffs. I accept a few D-Lo/LeBron heat checks from three. Other than that, drive it, relentlessly, into the defense and force the action at the rim and in the paint. It’s why we have such a wide free throw discrepancy, because we’re playing with power and strength. Golden State is, by far, the prettier team. But they don’t have an answer for AD in the paint altering shots and accumulating blocks. They don’t have an answer for our ability to at least show at the three point line and recover back into the paint. A lot of that is AD’s elite defense but there’s a lot of support coming from his teammates in the form of on-point backside rotations on the baseline and staying on guys in the corners. It all works only if it’s working together. that’s what was so impressive to me about LW4 coming in and executing the defensive game plan as if he had been running with the starters the whole time.

    Another must-win game for a team playing must-win games for the last 2 months. Fire forges steel. The Lakers have been in the fire for a good while now and we see the team has forged into something that has special potential. Need to back the potential up with results and those happen on the court. Go get another one tonight. Go Lakers.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    3 Comments
    • Great fiver, Jamie. Love to see the enthusiasm.
      AD shows up tonight as well as Playoff LeBron.
      Lakers drive stake into heart of Dubs’ Dynasty.

      • Nice post Jamie. It really all boils down to playing with force. We out shot the Warriors from 3 last game but that was an anomaly. We probably won’t again. We win with paint points and free throws. The Warriors are a jump shooting team and we’re last in drawing fouls. We were first and that must continue. I have given up on trying to predict AD’s scoring output. But with the exception of game 2 of this series he has been a beast on defense and the boards. We have enough firepower to make up for a sub par offensive night but as we saw in game 2 we get our ass handed to us if he is not stellar on the boards and defensively. This game is every bit as important as last game. It’s exceptionally difficult to win on the Warriors home court. I don’t see a let down at home for this team. I don’t expect another blow out, the Warriors are too good but I do see us winning. The Lakers crowd will supply the energy. first 3 games have been a series of chess moves by each coach. But I wonder how many more moves either coach has. This will be the 8th time we have played each other and by now each team knows the other pretty well. I don’t know if there is a magic move left for either team. It will boil down to execution and force.

    • Another great 5er, Jamie. Can’t agree more and like Tom said, “love to see the enthusiasm.” You are right on point.

  • Profile picture of Jamie Sweet

    Jamie Sweet wrote a new post

    5 Things: Lakers No-Show Game 2

    If you didn’t have ‘James’ or ‘Hachimura’ on your jersey last night you might as well have also gotten a ‘DNP-Content’ next to your name in the stat box. Seemingly content with their game 1 victory the Lakers looked sluggish, tired and generally disengaged for most of game 2. While it could also be said the Warriors were fighting for their playoff lives, the Lakers overall lackadaisical approach to game was frustrating for this Lakers’ fan.

    1. I want to believe AD is ready for the next step in his career. But I can’t. Not because of a lack of talent but his overall mentality and disposition have shown us that he just ain’t that dude. Mongo been saying it since before he got here and ever since. At times, I’ll admit, I allow myself to be fooled. For a game or three AD will look unstoppable on both ends. Blocking shots, fighting for rebounds, scoring inside and out. You get caught up in it and believe he’s figured it out, he’s found that gear, whatever parable one wishes to create. Inevitably it’ll be followed by a game (or worse, a stretch of games) where he simply shows up. Middling impact, drifts around the floor, especially on offense, and isn’t aggressive. That was the AD we got last night. Here’s hoping he goes into hibernation for the rest of what season is left to us.
    2. Wasted a vintage LeBron game. Looked like The King of old except that the rest of the team (save for one) no-showed the game. His assists were down, only 3, but that’s a byproduct of the house the Lakers seemed intent on building last night. It’s too bad because one has to wonder how many more of these kind of games, where he’s efficient inside and out, are left in LeBron’s career.
    3. Rui found his shot. 8-14, with a sparkling 4-6 from three, Hachimura found that stroke early and kept it going. While he alone was not able to help LeBron keep the Lakers in the game in the second half it was a welcome sight.
    4. Laker guards got schooled. All of them, even the ones who played in garbage time (OK, LW4 looked solid off the bench in GT). Simply put we can’t absorb bad games from all of Schroder, Russell, and Reaves. Combined they shot an abysmal 8-26 (1-9 from three), amassed 8 total rebounds and couldn’t stop Curry’s drives or Klay’s shots all game long. We’ll need those three to play a lot better if we want any chance at all.
    5. Home cooking and some coaching adjustments. Need some shots to start falling, AD to return to playoff form, and a few tweaks to the D. As AD outplayed the Warrior front line in game 1, so did Curry outplay our back court in game 2. Toss in Klay going off and voila! Loss. We need our guys on the baseline to have one eye on Curry and the other on a potential cutter. That’s not a difficult adjustment but it does require the defender to keep their head on a swivel and not relax. We also need to stop relying on the refs. Yes, you got fouled on that drive. Play on. The whistles will dry up the further we go and we need to rise above it.

    Still think we can get this done in 6.

    Read More
    Profile PhotoProfile Photo liked this
    4 Comments
    • Thanks, Jamie. We all here in Laker Nation had our hearts ripped off last night. I was very embarrassed and I am still hurting. The only thing I would add to your post is what I observed in garbage time.

      Number 1, I realized that we would need Lonnie in this series He has been dependable and one of our best shooters from the three-point range. We need to have him in order to counter the Warriors’ firepower. I don’t want anybody to tell me anything about his lack of defense. He is very athletic and not afraid to attack the rim.

      Number 2, I realized we could definitely use Tristan Thompson in this series to allow AD to rest and to help with the rebounding. Also, sprinkle in Gabriel to bring in some energy as usual. The only reason I watched garbage time last night was to see what Lonnie, Thompson, and Gabriel can bring to the table, and I was satisfied with what I saw.

      Finally, what I was very disappointed with was allowing the Warriors to score 84 points in just the second and third quarters alone. That is unacceptable. Are we not one of the best defensive teams in the league?

      • On paper perhaps BB. Just hope we aren’t Paper Tigers, lol.

        • I agree with your comment, DJ. But at this point, the Warriors are figuring us out and we are predictable with the way our offense is run. We need to come up with a different style of play. We could use Lonnie’s offense to help.

    • Aloha James, nice post. While I wasn’t surprised we lost, it was the way we lost which was disappointing. After a good first quarter it seems like we just gave up when the Warriors had their run in the 2nd. The thing that bothered me most about AD was his defense. While he offense has come and gone in this playoff run, his defense and rebounding remained elite. Until yesterday. I wonder if the 44 minutes he played in the first game impacted his energy level. The Warriors had the 2nd best home record this year but they had the 2nd worst road record. Win our home games and we move on.

  • Load More Posts