-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
I have to say I saw this going down 3 different ways and not minding any of them.
1) Could have kept both Mo and Malik, seen what a full camp and a more established role could have done and have two nice-sized deals to use at what is sure to be a wild and wacky trading deadline this season.
2) Package Mo and Malik and a multitude of draft picks, swaps, or even young players in a trade for an instant impact player. One assumes Rob and Co. did their due diligence on this one, kicked many tires on many trades, and came away unimpressed with the return.
3) Let then expire and rock free agency in a way only the Lakers can! I would have been fine with any of the above moves but I like this one best because it indicates what I think is a very important lesson learned: valuing continuity.
I’m thinking back to what LeBron said about teams who beat us having more chemistry, being together longer, and us not having that extra something to fall back on. This is showing that the Lakers are building an actual NBA team and not just assembling talent. Any player we bring in with the exceptions or cap space we use can be traded as well as Malik and Mo could have been with the bonus being if we don’t trade them then we’ll start to build that chemistry The King was yearning for.
As always team health will be the biggest factor but these subtle organizational choices give me a little more hope. Nice to see us continuing to pursue smart moves.
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Good stuff Jamie. I think one of the reasons they stood Pat was the value. I had seen Jalen as high as 8 in the mocks and almost always in the lottery. One thing you didn’t mention about him was his passing ability. He was considered perhaps the best passer in the draft. I have watched some video on him dropping some pretty incredible dimes.
-
I also read that they are not concerned by his 3 point shooting. He shot .333 % in collage. They feel there is upside there as well. Rob compared him the Austin who shot .317 in his rookie year and .398 last year. They feel he has the same work ethic as Austin. Max Christie shot .319 in college and .41% last year so you never know. I would love it if the Lakers hired a quality shooting coach, not just for the kids but for Vando, AD and LeBron too.
-
I’m happy with this pick. I’m so tired of small guards. Give me a kid like Jalen who does appear to be a players with skill sets similar to Austin Reaves. Big guards who can defend is a better starting point to search for guards than just being able to shoot. I could see Jalen and Austin complementing each other on the court together
-
-
-
What’s really odd is the two picks went to 20-year olds who aren’t going to do anything to help right now but are both big, physical They’re just investments for the future and could even be included in upcoming trades.
Then the two new two-ways are both 5-years of college older players who are ready to help right now. Castleton looks to be exactly what we need as a backup center. And Hodge is a 3&D player who actually shoots volume and plays great D.
I’m almost more excited about the two two-way players. Be interesting to see if they can break into the rotation for a change. I do love the focus on defense and size.
B+ to A- for the draft.
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Is there anything more unreasonably frenzied than the NBA off-season? Rumors both absurd and reasonable fly willy-nilly and all of it feels like, to quote Shakespeare, “sound and fury signifying nothing”.
NOLA ain’t breaking up their “if they could only stay healthy” team.
Maybe Beal gets traded but, honestly, who cares? Dude is overpaid and under-delivers. Never got the hype.
As an “I only care about the Lakers” I generally am dismissive of all the scuttlebutt and hyperbole. Gets hard when you’re just hoping to hear some positive Lakers news.
Anyhow, I’m still waiting for the actual CBA to be released so we can talk something of actual substance. Rumor Mill 2023-24 doesn’t do it for me.
-
Nanna always told us….”Consider the source”.
None of these “experts” are reporting from 1st hand knowledge; they ain’t in “The Room Where It Happens”. They’re being spoon-fed their info by agents & GMs & others involved in the decision making process. So then you have to ask yourself…”Why?” And who benefits from this information (or dis-information) going public?
I think I’ve reached the point where I’m tired of getting manipulated and simply don’t give a f<@k anymore.
I don’t wanna hear about the labor..just show me the baby. Then I’ll let u know if he’s cute..or not. lmao
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Great Fiver, Jamie.
1. FULL SPEED AHEAD is the only smart path to take. I agree every move we take must reflect that LeBron is nearing the end. That means we need to start getting serious about functionally adding players who can reduce our reliance and dependency on James’ playmaking, rebounding, interior defense, etc.
The game is already positionless basketball on offense but the positions you play are still the positions you can defend. Right now, that says LeBron is clearly now a power and not small forward.
We’re also in agreement that AD should not just play center. That he can be the best center and the best power forward is a reason why he should be both depending on what works in each game’s matchups. Frankly, I think added weight limits athleticism and does increase the possibility and severity of injuries.
2. POINT GUARD QUESTION. The multiple playmakers approach clearly makes sense for any team, even if you have LeBron James or Nikola Jokic. It’s again the positionless approach to the game. Five guys who can shoot, pass, rebound, screen, and defend.
LeBron is not going to start at point guard because he can’t defend that position. He will be listed as a 3 but will play a 4. I also think he is going to take off a lot during the regular season next year so Lakers do need a true starting point guard.
Will that be D’Angelo? I would not be surprised if they did not bring him back. They could let him walk and try to use the $12.2M NT MLE to sign Gabe Vincent. Saves money, allows them to bring back Reaves, Hachimura, and maybe even Schroder and Walker. Still need a back up center to protect the rim but could get that in the draft.
3. BEASLEY AND BAMBA. I could see them keeping them until the trade deadline but if they’re going to opt to hard cap themselves, the Lakers need to cut salary. That means not exercising the $16M team option on Beasley or guaranteeing Bamba’s $10M. Or you renounce Schroder and Walker. I believe Lakers are going to hard cap themselves, bring everybody back, and draft players who can help now.
4. REAVES AND RUI. I don’t see the Lakers losing either. They can match any offers and that’s what they will do. They’re back regardless of the cost. The only question for me is who does LeBron guard if Rui starts? Rui can only defend 4 and 5, same as LeBron, unless we are good enough that he can concentrate on defense and rebounding and not worry about scoring and playmaking,
5. PROSPECT LIST. I do like the idea of trading with Grizzlies for Tillman to be our backup center, but Adams is way too expensive and cannot stretch the floor. I would prefer Brook Lopez or Myles Turner. I don’t want players surrounding LeBron and AD who cannot shoot.
I would agree with the use of the NT MLE for Gabe Vincent and just waiving Dlo. Vincent and Reaves would be the best undrafted starting backcourt in the NBA. The other guy I would target with the BAE would be Trey Lyles, another Klutch client.
-
-
Nice post Jamie, my main concern with moving AD to the 4 has nothing to do with AD and everything to do with LeBron. At this stage of his career he has proven that he is no longer capable of guarding the perimeter except in short spurts. I don’t want him trying to keep up with wings in season 21. He has been most effective on the defensive end when he can hang back, call out defenses and help. You also now have less 3 point shooting with AD at the 4 and LeBron at the 3. This ain’t even 2020 LeBron. I think we are much better off with a decent back up center that can eat up 10 to 15 minutes a game.
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Great season everyone. Loved how this team fought. Plenty to unpack later.
-
Nightmare, to dream, back to reality. The team was never really well constructed and the late additions could only help them get so far. Went from arguably the worst Lakers season to one of the most memorable. Hats off to them for getting as far as they did and not just rolling over to a superior opponent.
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Reality has begun to sink in. Three things are true:
-At the start of the season I picked the Nuggets to go all the way (with the Heat coming out of the East, I believe but I’ll have to go back and listen to that podcast to be sure).
-After the trade and the first two series my Laker Fan Goggles convinced me the new-look Lakers could take Denver in 6 games with the only swap being we’d win game 2 in Denver after adjusting to the altitude.
-My Laker Goggles were wrong and my mind was spot on to start the season. Up until the playoffs I didn’t see anyone stopping Denver…except the Lakers and the Heat, maybe Boston if they could get Tatum to be consistent (they have not). It’s not what most of planet Earth wants but it looks like they’re gonna get Denver-Miami.
Anyhow, the game.
1) Lakers continued to have no answer to Jamal Murray. Over two quarters and two different games Murray went absolutely bonkers against the kitchen sink the Lakers threw at him torching us for 53 points. The tandem between Murray and Jokic reminds me a lot of the Pau-Kobe Konnection but less lopsided. Either player is comfortable sliding into the alpha role and then again back out of it, acquiescing to the other’s greatness without ego.
2) Lakers thought they had Jokic in a box, didn’t take advantage of it, then he broke out of the box. Through 3 quarters Jokic looked fairly pedestrian and our chances of getting back into the series looked pretty good. Then the 4th quarter came, he had plenty left in the tank unlike in Denver when he ceded the spotlight to Murray, and he finished us off in game 4 flipping Denver’s script mildly enough for the Lakers, again, to have no answer.
3) The Denver Nuggets, as a whole, are deeper and better than the Lakers. The core of the Nuggets (Joker, Jamal, MPJ) have been together for 5 seasons and through a lot together. Aaron Gordon and KCP were dynamite pick ups for them. Bruce Brown has been stellar. Their bench, even though it has been outscored in most games by our bench, has had more of an overall impact on the game. Points are but one facet of the jewel that makes up an NBA game. The Nuggets have simply been the better team in the facets that matter the most: grit, clutch scoring, poise, and execution under pressure.
4) D-Lo shrinking big time. Even the ESPN announcers were saying Russell had become un-playable. His three point shot has left the series, his defense has always been questionable (at best), and when he’s not scoring he doesn’t find other ways to contribute. He’s a series defining -53, which only tells part of the futility tale. I have never been sold on D-Lo, dude can make shots but lacks that killer mentality you want in one of your top 3 players. Post game he himself had no answers which never bodes well. Feels like he could go full 1-2-3 Cancun on us in game 4 a la Nick “Wasn’t Long For the Team After That” Van Exel. He could do a lot by coming out a lot more aggressive in game 4 and make the Nuggets think about guarding him more but no matter what adjustment he and the staff come up with it’s likely too little, too late.
5) Coach Ham’s rookie status is showing. In my opinion Michael Malone is one of the 3 best coaches in the NBA. Without pissing anyone off he has managed a core group through injuries, role adjustments, an MVP unable to get as far as they have this season and all in the tough Western Conference. You could have heard a pin drop when the Nuggets won the #1 seed in the west, so little was the fanfare. Same went for every team they dispatched in the playoffs. Evidently, when people ask for “what historical games” proof of the Nuggets ability to win they forget that it actually took historical games from both Durant and Brooks to get that to 7 games. We ain’t come close to matching what Phoenix brought to their series. Maybe beating the Lakers will elevate their rep, and winning a title would certainly cement both Malone’s and Jokic’s greatness, but I kind of doubt it. They’ll say the same things they did about Miami getting to the NBA Finals in the Bubble or some such silliness. I’m not fooled, the Nuggets are kicking our ass and might go all the way.Should have never believed in those Laker Goggles. FWIW I’d like to see what this team, as-is for the most part, can do with a pre-season and 82 games to come together. The chemistry of the Nuggets is showing as much as their talent. Frankly, at this stage, it ain’t about talent. Everyone has talent at this point of the playoffs. It comes down to intangibles things that just don’t show up in the box score. In a lot of ways the Lakers are now built incorrectly, as well. We’re built for LeBron and AD to carry the majority of the load on both ends and they’re simply not up to the task, especially James. Not anymore. My big fear is he ends up getting surgery on that foot this summer, it’s obviously affecting his jump shot and has since he came back from whatever rehab he did before the season ended.
Same for AD. There’s a part of me that thinks it’d be best for both to get whatever issues they have in their feet fixed as best they can. There’s another part of me that knows that, if they go that route, the Lakers are basically done for the next 5-6 years unless they luck into a star or someone forces their way here.
I’m not too bummed, honestly, still got a game to work with and make this interesting. Win at Crypto tomorrow and see what you can do in Denver. Would like to avoid a sweep but Laker History tells us a sweep is actually the most likely (the Lakers have never forced a game 5 hen down 3-0). There will be a more positive post talking about what this team was able to accomplish post-trade deadline but for now we’re dealing with where we’re at.
I guess this wasn’t so short, lol…
-
I think part of our problem is fatigue. We just have not had the energy to close out games. No way LeBron should be playing 43 minutes. Same goes for AD. They each have played 40 or more minutes throughout the playoffs and it’s catching up to them. We have had to play with playoff intensity since the trade deadline. Denver began resting guys in March. Hopefully we can pull one out Monday and avoid the sweep. I’m okay with the season if we do lose. We really exceeded all my expectations.
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Play the same way we have and this won’t be pretty. We’ve seen what a lack of 48 minute focus and intensity has done to Boston. Lakers want to change this sad story they gotta do it tonight. We are not a pretty team, we are not a jump shooting team, we are a heavy weight boxer that pummels their opponent with body blows. If we don’t accept that we will lose. Lose and we might get swept. Get swept and a lot of good things that have happened will be easy to overlook. I think a lot of these guys should be Lakers going forward but I suspect Rob and Co. might think differently. Win, win again, the pressure will high for everyone. The higher the pressure the more I think it favors LBJ and AD but that means winning tonight.
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
A lotta these are going to be the same in any series and that’s because, at it’s core, winning basketball comes down to managing the same few things.
1) Control the glass (whoops in game 1). It is crucial we rectify the outrageous rebounding differential we endured in game 1. Especially on the offensive glass. One and done has to be the way forward. Anything else and we don’t have a chance.
2) Pick your poison with Jokic. His 34 points we can absorb. It’s when those also come along with over 10 assists meaning he was responsible for (at a minimum) 62 points and probably more. Honestly it’s probably closer, if not over, 70. One man cannot create 70 points/game and we expect to win. Gotta keep that number under 60. I’d prefer he score 45-50 and have 5 or 6 dimes because that means the Denver attack is less multi-faceted.
3) Don’t let Murray shoot over 50% from anywhere. Another “whoops in game 1” as Murray shot 12-20 overall, and 4-8 from three. Now one of those was a H.O.R.S.E. shot that I would dare him to make again but the fact remains we left him wide open far too often and he got to the rim far too easily. Is this a byproduct of the attention and defensive focus that The Joker creates? Absolutely but we can, and must, do better.
4) Our team has to be better than their team. AD and LBJ will, essentially, cancel out Jokic and Murray. That means the rest of the Lakers have to beat the rest of the Nuggets and they didn’t show up until it was too late. Other than Rui nobody had significant impact off the bench, D-Lo and Schorder combined for 14 points on 6-14 shooting (mostly D-Lo’s fault but Schroder was not aggressive enough going at anyone on Tuesday and wasn’t the defensive factor that off-set his lack of scoring punch). We won our other series by getting solid overall production from the starting 5 and someone off the bench stepped up big in the wins. That’s the formula we need to continue to embrace.|
5) Continue to adapt. We saw a late-game adjustment almost work and if LeBron takes it to the hole against Murray instead of settling for herky-jerky threes and trying to draw a silly foul we may be talking differently. Maybe we start Rui, maybe we start Lonnie for a little more size and speed to start and swap Hachimura onto Jokic situationally. We definitely need players on the floor who will crash the glass and, frankly, that’s not either D-Lo or Dennis. They stand and wait for the ball to bounce to them and we need guys getting their feet off the floor and crashing the glass. The Nuggets will likely have already figured out a decent counter to Hachimura on The Joker (and a lot of that success was also the dude probably got a little gassed by the 4th quarter). We can’t always do a rope-a-dope and come out heavy in the 4th. We need to come out punching better at the start and maintain that ferocity. Everyone should be adjusted to the altitude by now, that’s a crappy excuse anyhow. Lakers need to start with fire, not find it when it suits them.
-
Lakers are going to start Rui Hachimura instead of Dennis Schroder with Rui being primary defender of Nikola Jokic. Ham will mirror AD and Rui with Joker’s minutes.
-
Nice post Jamie, I think the Lakers will mix up the coverages on the Joker. You will see Rui, AD, maybe Lebron at times, he’s the strongest guy in the game. They may even dust Thompson off for a few minutes. I don’t think you can give the Joker a steady diet of any one coverage. He will eventually figure it out. TNT had a good point. You can’t let him dribble the ball up. You can let him walk into an action. They also mentioned putting him in pick and rolls as much as possible. You want to wear him down. He can block some shots but over all he is not a good defender.
-
Nice post Jamie, I think the Lakers will mix up the coverages on the Joker. You will see Rui, AD, maybe Lebron at times, he’s the strongest guy in the game. They may even dust Thompson off for a few minutes. I don’t think you can give the Joker a steady diet of any one coverage. He will eventually figure it out. TNT had a good point. You can’t let him dribble the ball up. You can let him walk into an action. They also mentioned putting him in pick and rolls as much as possible. You want to wear him down. He can block some shots but over all he is not a good defender.
-
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Had issues logging in but now I’m back.
Solid game against Denver, need to compete better on the glass and I like Rui on Joker.
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
EXcellent fiver, Jamie. Getting harder and harder not to be optimistic about this team and their chances.
Adding Lonnie to the rotation was a huge move and, as you pointed out, should help replace Reaves scoring for the bench. Lakers proving they, not the Warriors, are the deeper team with more player who can give you a win on a given day.
LeBron being free to figure out what we need to win is going to become one of this team’s huge strengths. Loved how James became the point guard in the fourth and willed the Lakers to dominate that last 3 minutes.
Warriors are learning that this Lakers team is much better than they thought. What they’re watching is a team that’s getting better each game and each series. Last series, they couldn’t close the Grizzlies in 5. Tomorrow night, they will close the Dubs in 5.
-
There’s no doubt it all starts and ends with LBJ and AD but having the potential of up to 5 different guys who can step into a scoring void and push us over the top is a huge luxury. Where the Warriors have specialized guys at a lot of positions we have more dynamic players who can fill out a couple different roles and those permutations are going to be tough for any team to stop altogether. Sometimes guys will miss shots or we won’t get to the line enough to offset our poor three point shooting. But it’s hard to see that happening over an entire 7 game series. It could, in theory, and every round just gets harder, but this team is showing a lot of heart right now.
-
Nice post Jamie, I think the next game we need to just stay attached into the stretch and let LeBron orchestrate. The Warriors will probably score more this game, so will have to score more as well. They will hit more 3’s. While can’t win a 3 point shoot out, we will need to do better than 24%. And if the Warriors go tiny again we need to get AD the ball more than we did in the 2nd half. They don’t have an answer for him.
-
-
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Great fiver, Jamie. Love to see the enthusiasm.
AD shows up tonight as well as Playoff LeBron.
Lakers drive stake into heart of Dubs’ Dynasty.-
Nice post Jamie. It really all boils down to playing with force. We out shot the Warriors from 3 last game but that was an anomaly. We probably won’t again. We win with paint points and free throws. The Warriors are a jump shooting team and we’re last in drawing fouls. We were first and that must continue. I have given up on trying to predict AD’s scoring output. But with the exception of game 2 of this series he has been a beast on defense and the boards. We have enough firepower to make up for a sub par offensive night but as we saw in game 2 we get our ass handed to us if he is not stellar on the boards and defensively. This game is every bit as important as last game. It’s exceptionally difficult to win on the Warriors home court. I don’t see a let down at home for this team. I don’t expect another blow out, the Warriors are too good but I do see us winning. The Lakers crowd will supply the energy. first 3 games have been a series of chess moves by each coach. But I wonder how many more moves either coach has. This will be the 8th time we have played each other and by now each team knows the other pretty well. I don’t know if there is a magic move left for either team. It will boil down to execution and force.
-
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Thanks, Jamie. We all here in Laker Nation had our hearts ripped off last night. I was very embarrassed and I am still hurting. The only thing I would add to your post is what I observed in garbage time.
Number 1, I realized that we would need Lonnie in this series He has been dependable and one of our best shooters from the three-point range. We need to have him in order to counter the Warriors’ firepower. I don’t want anybody to tell me anything about his lack of defense. He is very athletic and not afraid to attack the rim.
Number 2, I realized we could definitely use Tristan Thompson in this series to allow AD to rest and to help with the rebounding. Also, sprinkle in Gabriel to bring in some energy as usual. The only reason I watched garbage time last night was to see what Lonnie, Thompson, and Gabriel can bring to the table, and I was satisfied with what I saw.
Finally, what I was very disappointed with was allowing the Warriors to score 84 points in just the second and third quarters alone. That is unacceptable. Are we not one of the best defensive teams in the league?
-
-
Aloha James, nice post. While I wasn’t surprised we lost, it was the way we lost which was disappointing. After a good first quarter it seems like we just gave up when the Warriors had their run in the 2nd. The thing that bothered me most about AD was his defense. While he offense has come and gone in this playoff run, his defense and rebounding remained elite. Until yesterday. I wonder if the 44 minutes he played in the first game impacted his energy level. The Warriors had the 2nd best home record this year but they had the 2nd worst road record. Win our home games and we move on.
-
- Load More Posts
Friends
havoc
@havoc
Legend44
@legend44
LRob
@lrob
NuggetsCountry (Director)
@nuggetscountry
therealhtj
@therealhtj
Recent posts
Mini 5er
- November 24, 2024
5 Things: It’s the Simple Things
- November 22, 2024
5 Things: Lakers Finding A Way
- November 20, 2024
Looking Good, Still Room For Improvement
- November 17, 2024
5 Things: Frizzle Fried
- November 7, 2024
5 Things: Lakers Fall Flat and Get Rolled
- October 31, 2024
5 Things: Lakers Drop 1st Game of the Season
- October 29, 2024
5 Things: Back-to-Back Wins Show Us All Something Good
- October 28, 2024
5 Things: 1st boxes checked
- October 23, 2024
5 Things: Here We Go
- October 22, 2024
GREAT to see Lonzo Ball
- October 16, 2024
This One Was Hard to Watch
- October 15, 2024
This choice also makes it more likely we keep our future draft assets for the time being.