-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
What coulda been a real dud of a roadie was salvaged by gritty wins in Boston and The Mecca, and they didn’t wholly screw the pooch in Charlotte. Sitting 2 games above .500 and looking exactly like the record shows the Lakers have many issues and few paths forward for improvement. But one tradeable draft pick, a bevy of pick swap seasons and some 2nd rounders. In short, not much when placed against the back drop if multiple 1st rounders flying all over the league the last few years. Couple that with no truly expiring salary relief and Rob doesn’t have a lot to work with.
1) Towel Gate! Evidently LeBron now uses towels as a form of code. Great reporting, Windhorst, it’s that level of expert journalism that guarantees I’ll never tune in to watch your show. Don’t feel bad, though, I don’t watch anyone else’s shows, either. The notion that LeBron “needs” to send a message to the FO is beyond asinine. They know the drill and it’s not a difficult equation. LeBron is old, Lakers will be bad for about a decade after he leaves, everyone involved should be on board with a ‘win now’ mentally.
2) Keep Reaves?! Trade DLo?!?! Whatever will happen?!?!?! Who knows, probably nothing and I guarantee it won’t be anyone if the trades we’ve seen blathered about on every show and podcast across the land. It never is. All I know for a fact is that DLo’s uptick of late is about exactly how he played down the stretch last season and Reaves has looked more like his pre-summer World Hoops self, too. The issue is we have nascent production out of the 3 spot and rely on a 39 year old to collapse the defense.
3) Max is gone next season so might as well get SOMETHING for him. Too many talented Lakers have walked for nothing the last several seasons, you inexplicably signed him to a 2 year rookie deal and he’s shown decent growth. Trade him into a bad team’s cap space for couple 2nd rounders and call it a win. You won’t be able to afford him next season, anyhow. Plus he’s probably find a better PT opportunity in URFA, anyhow.
4) OMG!!!! Could the Lakers ACTUALLY trade the King?!?!?!
Really? Please, just…just stop and think before anyone goes and writes something like that. The Lakers will let LeBron walk and might still retire his jersey simply for the history and legacy. We will never, ever, ever, never, ever, never, never trade him. Ever.
5) Build around the right guy. ProTip: it ain’t LeBron. AD signed a big time extension and it makes him about as tradable as Zach LaVibe. Which is to say not at all. Given his age, injury history, propensity for getting injured and the fact he’s not a play initiator but more of a play finisher it’s real hard to see him bringing back much in a trade beyond some decent picks and maybe a promising player but definitely not a superstar of the tiger he was when we traded for him. So make sure you build the team around the guy who is probably gonna be here longer.
3 Comments-
-
I won’t be surprised if there isn’t a trade or a smaller deal that no one has even mentioned. After all no one saw the trade deadline deals last year coming. I do disagree about Max. I think the Lakers will keep him on f he isn’t sweetener in a larger deal. He has shown a lot of growth and they have bird rights. By the way I discovered the reason for the 2 year deals. Before this last agreement, teams could only sign 2nd round players and undrafted player for 2 years unless the dipped into MLE money for longer deals. That been changed. I believe the Lakers lobbied for it because it’s called the Pelinka rule. This year Lewis was signed for 3 years with the new rule.
-
Interesting, good find Michael (re: The Pelinka Rule).
We sign max and we’re over the 2nd apron, i think, so that will be a no-go zone for jeannie. need to go back and look at the #s tho.
-
-
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Aloha Jamie, I agree with most of your takes except the effect of injuries. It’s been and still is a problem. Rui had been playing exceptionally well and was named the starter going forward and 8 minutes in and was hurt. He would have been a problem for the Suns playing a defense to stop AD and LeBron. Wood seemed to finally turn the corner and had been playing well. His ability to stretch the floor and rebound, would have also made a big difference. And Hayes would not have seen the floor. They out rebounded us by 9 with 13 offensive boards. That gap would have been closed some with Wood. Cam is our second best perimeter defender. The Suns repeatedly targeted Max. He likely would not have seen much if any playing time if Cam had not been hurt 8 minutes in. And we sleep on Vincent because he hasn’t played much but he was brought in to specifically guard guys like Beal. He definitely would have helped. I agree with the system criticism but it’s been difficult with the revolving lineups do to injuries. This teams strength was never in its starting line up but in its depth and that depth has rarely been available. I honestly don’t fear the Suns, they are thin and live and die by jump shots. They shot 36% from 3 which isn’t elite. Many of those makes came in transition after a dumb turnover. If healthy we can beat this team in a playoff series. But that is the key.
-
Michael, I totally agree with you on your last paragraph. You are right about the injuries. It forces lineup changes to the point where chemistry becomes unattainable. I know every team goes through that and should not be an excuse. But to be still in preseason mode almost halfway through the season because of lineup changes forced on you due to injuries is undesirable and should not be ignored. The three main issues this team is dealing with right now are the opponent’s three-points allowed, our own poor three-point shooting, and turnovers.
-
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
As we near the trading deadline the standings ain’t doing the Lakers any favors. With February coming fast an d the deadline with it, a lot of teams have moved up into a competitive slot.
While it’s fun to play GM, one imagines real GMs are as driven as the players they sign to win and when you have a shot at the playoffs and a healthy roster today it’s easier to punt a trade to the summer. Yes that Lakers 2029 pick could have real value…or not…but it’s still with the Lakers, still 6 years out, and if you really, really, really wanted it you could trade for it wherever it ends up any time between now and the 2029 draft. Currently crossing themselves off of my own list as potential trading partners are the following teams:Chicago – Why? Started winning w/o LaVine, steadied the ship, and when he came back they went 3-0. Bulls are in a 4 team pileup for the 9/10 spots in the playin and, with a little luck, could push their way into an actual playoff spot as currently constructed. Swapping LaVine and/or Caruso would mean they think they’re getting a better player back to make that push more realistic. Rui, DLo and definitely Vincent are decidedly not the better player no matter which way you cut it. Flush with their own draft assets until 20230, the allure of another pick 6 years out, however it’s conveyed, probably isn’t worth the gamble.
Utah – Why? Because they’re winning as-is, have ample draft assets and guys on expiring deals they can resign just like we did. For a team like Utah, never to be considered a free agent destination team, finding an affordable core that works is imperative. Trading for someone like DLo who doesn’t move their own internal needle for guys that do doesn’t seem likely since they look like they’ve adopted the Pacers mantra of “compete while we rebuild”. With THT and Olynyk on expiring deals and looking at only $97 million in committed money next season it will be and easy choice to bid Old Long Arms adios and retain the impactful Kelly-O on a deal that works for both player and team since they’ll need to come up to apron floor before next season anyhow. If they believe in THT, too, they’ll have the MLE or simply cap room with which to keep him, as well.
Indiana – Why? They’re 4th in the East and should get Haliburton back around the trading deadline. Even with a little slippage there will be enough time for them to right the ship. Again, if they were to make a move it would be one where they’re getting the better player back. DLo, Rui and Gabe don’t fit the criteria for a variety of reasons. With Buddy’s expiring deal and a team option on Bruce Brown (who really hasn’t had the same impact there he did in Denver, although a lot of what he brings doesn’t show up in the box score and like Rui he truly shined in the playoffs) it seems unlikely that Indy would clog their cap sheet with our guys just for a draft pick. More likely they look to retain Buddy, who has not asked out through the bad or good times, or maybe overpay for another solid role-player or two this summer if they decide to move on from Brown.
Now when it comes to teams on the outside looking in and not generating any upward momentum (personally just looking at Atlanta, Memphis and Golden State) while also not having a trove of picks on-hand, currently, the calculus changes.
Golden State is all but guaranteed to be over the cap once next season rolls around unless they don’t retain Klay Thompson (which feels more likely with each middling game) and waive Paul (owed $30 mil, most/all of which is NG). They still are gonna take their cues from Steph for as long as he’s willing to grind with them. Could the under-performing Wiggins benefit from a new team? His deal is a major risk given how his production has fallen off a cliff and Golden State has most of their in-house draft picks for the next few years but, if they’re planning on being an over the cap team, could always use more since it’ll be the only way they can acquire talent at some point.
Memphis is in free fall, has to be second-guessing literally every move it’s made last season (or aren’t doing their jobs if they’re not) and has major question marks at every position. Smart hasn’t brought the heart he showed in Boston, hasn’t galvanized the team against the world like I’m sure they hoped he would, and is out for 6 weeks. Might they be willing to take back Gabe, Prince and a top-five protected 2029 FRP or a swap in the years to come? The money would need to be tweaked since Memphis is over the cap so we’d need to use one or more of our current Trade Exceptions to make it work.
Atlanta is the closest one of these three to being in the playoff mix. The Murray/Young tandem doesn’t seem to have panned out as hoped for, the issue here being not so much that I don’t think Murray is gettable but rather that if one of 3 or 4 other teams deem him the piece they need they can outbid us with ease. Murray would be a great fit alongside LeBron and AD, is a better defender than either Reaves or DLo and so, sinc the Lakers would be unlikely to have either the better draft capital or player included (and can’t offer cap relief for next season like they can after this summer), would have a hard time coming up to another team’s best offer. It could also be that Atlanta is willing to punt on trades this season and wait until next when they have expiring deals to pair with Murray and probably bring back better talent.
Now, all of the above is based on the fact that the Lakers are advertising that reaves is a no-go zone. Personally I think they view him through the Caruso lens (You gotta “WOW!!!” us) but one way or the other the perception is that he’s not gettable right now. Were that to change I can see the odds stacking up to benefit the Lakers a little more. Frankly the Lakers would be on my list of teams who believe in what they have, as-is, and feel they can punt trades until the summer/next season when DLo’s deal with be a lot more valuable, guys like Vincent and hachimura will have one fewer years on their deals and could prove they’re worthy of a bigger role, and that 2029 pick gets one year closer.
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Quotes like this from a head coach are wholly and completely unacceptable: “I’m tired of people living and dying with every single game we play,” Ham said. “It’s ludicrous. Actually. Like, come on, man. It’s a marathon.”
Dude. While it may be a long season it does happen to be one in which every game does fucking matter. The Houston Rockets currently have a better record than the Lakers. Your excuses are tired and lame. There’s nothing about your post game press conferences that indicate you understand how poorly this is all going right now.
Pull your head outta your ass Coach or you’ll be watching Doc Rivers take over quicker than he can take his head set off.
-
I can’t recall the Lakers ever firing a coach this far into a season. Rudy T left due to health issues and Mike Brown got canned 5 games in. That’s about it. But D.Ham’s recent media comments have been cringe (as the kids say..lol)
-
It just seems like she’s not reading the situation very well. Keeps talking about things and the locker room, as a whole, kinda pushes back. Coach talks injuries/health and the players say they got enough to compete better. Coach brings up IST, Bron says it was two games.
-
It’s just a bad look all around. While I doubt they would hire Doc outta the ESPN gig I could see promoting Handy but not too sure what difference it would make. Rookie Coach + LeBron x his legacy = where we’re at. I think you brought up the magical run to the WCF when we rocked hard on an easy ish portion of the sched, had a favorable seeding and a lot of off season choices were based on that. Feels like a lotta eggs got put into that basket and while it’s all well and good for fans to get all feel good vibey (personally guilty on that one) GMs and decision makers need to be cool headed. Still time to pull outta this nosedive but it’s gotta start sooner than later.
-
-
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Not sure what to say.
1) LBJ and AD really can’t do much else. One could accuse LBJ of kinda loafing through the Miami game. Not last night. When these guys both score 30+ we really should win those games.
2) I thought we needed Vando’s D on Ja more than whatever the coaching staff seems to think TP brings. JV could help his own case by being a factor of some kind on offense, too.
3) Why are we unable to make a meaningful in-game adjustment. I get it: the game plan was to give up threes and takeaway the paint. When that’s not working you have to switch it up. Vogel was brilliant at knowing when to do that. Ham is not. Seems like it takes him a week to figure things out and we’re burning games.
4) Less and less of a fan of the “switch everything” scheme as the de facto defense. I think we need to be more versatile based on the players we have on the roster. One scheme does not fit all and we watched Ja abuse the slower defender to basically win the game in the last 5 minutes with nothing done about it.
5) What can turn this around? Getting Rui and DLo back might help…depending on how the coach uses them. Honestly this feels more like a rookie head coach season than last year did. It’s weird. It’s as if every success last season emboldened a bewildering self confidence in whatever the current choice du jour is without consideration for other tactics. Ham talking about support from Jeannie et al is almost a worse look than blaming injuries. -
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
As we move into 2024 the Lakers have some good and bad problems that need settling. Injuries, a travel-heavy schedule after the IST has slow whatever momentum that was generated by winning said tournament. Here are five ways to augment the good and mitigate the bad.
1) Put one of a Reaves or Russell back in the starting lineup and, barring injury, make it as permanent as possible. The new-lol starting five has a high ceiling defensively but its floor on offense is quite low. It needs another shooter and playmaker. Either player makes sense and I don’t much care which one.
2) This would bump one of Cam, TP or Vando to the bench. At this point Prince seems pretty entrenched as a starter and I like his shot making with LeBron and AD to at lest try and soften the paint. Between Cam and Vando I’d say Cam’s played better this season but has also been out with a groin which may end up being a lengthy recovery injury but hopefully not. If balancing the bench is a major concern (it is) Cam off the bench makes sense, too. Whichever one gets the nod needs to be in-point defensively and rebound better than either player has done for most of the season while also looking for their offense in the moments it’s required.
3) Whenever he plays DLo needs to play more than 20 mpg. If you want to get anything out of him on the court or in a trade nothing’s being helped by playing him meager role minutes. He’s either part of what we’re trying to do or a future trade chip but neither scenario is aided by sitting him for more than half the game. While he won’t likely outplay his rep, if anything the need to bench him likely solidified it, but you still want to give him a chance to shoot his way into a better role or trade scenario.
4) Switch everything, zone up, trap, or full court press one-on-one but whatever defense we’re using has to adjust and correct when the other team is shooting 50%. I like the length we can deploy but bits meaningless if we’re not contesting shots or stopping drives and forcing tough mid range jumpers. We’re giving up the kind of shots coaches want so whatever’s being deployed isn’t working very well.
5) LeBron and AD are healthy and playing really well. While that in and of itself may not be quite enough to hang with the best in the west it means the coaching staff can focus on what players work best around then and when in whatever combos they prefer. Guys not named LeBron and AD shoulda known what they were signing on for: all in on a banner. If that means starting, so be it and good job. If it means coming off the bench then you do it and you do it well. If you’re riding the pine, stay ready and don’t squander the opportunity when the light shines in you. Champions are not won by the stars alone. Lakers history is filled with guys who could have started, didn’t and excelled off the bench and swung games for the better. It’s impossible to think of the Bubble Banner and not remember Dwight and JaVale, reduced to mere garbage time players by the end, cheering their teammates on all game long. You can contribute without playing, even if that’s not the path envisioned.
All in all I think some minor changes can help some but most of this comes down to coaches coaching a little better and the players executing a little better. Also, everyone needs to stop with the passive aggressive finger pointing. Stop blaming the replay center, the rotations, the health, and just go out and play your hardest and your best. That has a funny way of solving problems and it really could be as simple as that.
-
I pretty much Agree Jamie. I will say that this starting units defense has a chance to be really good if they ever have the chance to play together for a while. But as usual injuries is preventing that. Still I agree that it’s probably better to have a guard in the starting lineup. While the new line up has unleashed AD, the only thing that stopped him last game was foul trouble, you need another play maker, another that can collapse the paint. Both Austin and DLO can do that. Prince is not good attacking the paint. Vando doesn’t even try. Cams a little better at it. It would also give us another shooter. Still the key to anything we try is going to be health. We have to have guys together long enough to develop some chemistry. And unfortunately we are starting 2024 the way we ended 2023 with 3 important players fighting injuries. Hopefully at least one or two of them will be available against the Heat.
-
HAPPY NEW YEAR, JAMIE. GOOD FIVER!
1) Think Reaves will replace Rui in the long-term starting lineup that lasted half of 1 game. It’s the logical move now. Might have to start doubling and trapping more to help Austin on D and he will have to get better if he wants to remain a starter. In the end, I think this is the right move but Reaves starting is only temporary.
2) I’ve changed minds on Prince and like that he’s letting it fly. C/b better on D but he still starts. Front office is not going to let Ham play 2 non-shooters. My choice is like yours Cam because his overall O is livable whereas Vando as is is not. Guy gets blocked at the rim and throws air balls from the corner.
3) Man, we need to see a trade on Jan 15, not Feb 5. The less I see of DLO, the better. This team needs to play fast and physical and DLO is the antithesis of both of those.
4) We should still switch everything, even with Austin starting, just need to give him help and not leave him on an island 1-on-1. Change up, double, trap, help. That’s how team defense works. Switch everything fits better with drop coverage. We get killed by floaters and midrange jumpers. Lot harder to get those when the opponent switches everything.
5) My biggest criticism of Ham is too much experimenting. It’s like Rob gave him too many toys to play with which cost us valuable time and we’re still not done. Find specific roles that work for everybody. Wood spot up 3-ball shooter, rebounder, and good perimeter defender with help. Max pretty much same thing, He’s not a point guard or playmaker. Guys are too ofter asked to do what is not their strengths. Build smart rotations that work. NOW!
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
1) Excuses are like, well we all know the quote. You’re paid to play a game. Be ready.
2)Remember when we hoped for good health? Yeah, me neither.
3) Can’t have this many guys out and not defend the three better. It’s like we’ve chosen to let teams bomb away.
4) Hats off to NOLA. They came ready for revenge and, to a man, played like it.
5) Not sure we got enough to swing a lotta the trades I see bandied about but this won’t do.1 Comment-
I know, no one likes excuses Jamie but the Pels hadn’t played a game since Thursday and were only missing one guy. We played the night before and got in at 3:20am and when Rui was hurt in the 1st quarter we were missing 3 important role players. The energy disparity was obvious. Like I wrote, Phil Jackson would have circled this game as a schedule loss.
-
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
Well this is a disturbing trend. Lakers just can’t seem to generate any momentum post IST. We’re one step forwards two steps backing our way through the regular season right now.
1) Lakers won the first quarter and the new starting lineup actually kicked a lotta butt. Shoulda closed with that lineup since the bench managed to do nothing at all for most of the game.
2) Reaves needs to make better reads in general. He’s letting the defense completely dictate his offense. He’s stuck in attack mode and he’s not engaging the team enough. For as much as he has the ball in his hands and time is on the clock you need to create for your squad. Especially when your shot isn’t falling.
3) AD would be a multi-award candidate if our record was better. No .500 team is going to have players in the MVP convo unless you’re averaging a triple-double. He could be a DPOY candidate but, with the record being what it is, will likely have to settle for All Defense 1st team.
4) Good defense has to be a lot more than the gaudy, flashy stats. Too many people over-value stats like steals and blocks. While they are a measure of the defense to a small degree they rarely paint a complete picture. We let the T’Wolves score with ease when we didn’t turn them over. That’s not good defense, it’s average and it needs to improve, especially when the bench comes in.
5) How long can he keep this up? Turning 39 and he looks like a 32 year old out there. The King continues to amaze. Not clear to me whether it was a 2 or a 3 but the fact that he seems to never get the benefit of the doubt from the officials must be annoying. The rules state that if there isn’t sufficient evidence to overturn a call it stands as called. So, had they first called it a 3 it likely would have stood. Just one of those things that will break right for us, at least one hopes, but the game was lost well before that shot. It was lost with some clutch missed free throws and bad defense allowing Minnesota to score with ease. - Load More Posts
Friends
havoc
@havoc
Legend44
@legend44
LRob
@lrob
NuggetsCountry (Director)
@nuggetscountry
therealhtj
@therealhtj
Recent posts
5 Things: It’s the Simple Things
- November 22, 2024
5 Things: Lakers Finding A Way
- November 20, 2024
Looking Good, Still Room For Improvement
- November 17, 2024
5 Things: Frizzle Fried
- November 7, 2024
5 Things: Lakers Fall Flat and Get Rolled
- October 31, 2024
5 Things: Lakers Drop 1st Game of the Season
- October 29, 2024
5 Things: Back-to-Back Wins Show Us All Something Good
- October 28, 2024
5 Things: 1st boxes checked
- October 23, 2024
5 Things: Here We Go
- October 22, 2024
GREAT to see Lonzo Ball
- October 16, 2024
This One Was Hard to Watch
- October 15, 2024
Rondo Helping Coach the Bucks
- October 3, 2024
Did LBJ deliver a Ring like he said? No bubble crap, it hangs along with the others. No one gonna watch plain jane Lakers. They have to have a Legend or one in the making! I am watching to see if LBJ plays at Indy end of March, if not, I ain’t going. And I have always said paying AD 60M is crazy! He terrific, but 60M?