-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1831364416455287182
It feels like a lifetime away when Lonzo Ball was the talk of the basketball world. He was believed to have the potential to be a generational point guard. Seven years on and we are yet to see that version of him.
There have been glimpses here and there throughout the course of his career. But it has always felt like one step forward and three back for Ball.
Injuries have been the main reason behind that. After making a bright start with the Chicago Bulls, he has missed two-plus seasons of basketball due to a knee injury and undergone three surgeries during that period of time.
The hope is that Ball will be back on the court next season. The Bulls are already prepared if he does not, with Josh Giddey set to be their starting point guard moving forward.
The best-case scenario for Ball right now is to get back on the court and prove that he is healthy enough to still be an asset to a team, whether that be the Bulls or someone else.
According to Nathaniel Holloway on GIVEMESPORT, the Los Angeles Lakers should pursue a trade to bring back Ball. He wrote further regarding his suggestion: “Ball is a much better playmaker and passer than Russell and would fit well in a lineup that includes both LeBron and Davis. Russell is more of a shoot-first point guard who took away shots from the All-Star duo last season.
“Ball is a more traditional point guard who looks to pass first but can still knock down shots when given the opportunity.
“Ball is also a much better defender than Russell.”
On paper, Ball does look like a better fit to play alongside LeBron James and Anthony Davis for the Lakers. The questions are not about his ability on the court though, they are about his ability to stay on it. Also, if he did succeed in returning, would he be the same player?
Of course, the Lakers were the ones who drafted Ball second overall in 2017 and he spent two seasons playing in Los Angeles before being traded to the New Orleans Pelicans as part of the Davis deal.
Any team pursuing a trade for Ball in the future would be taking a major risk. But with the Lakers needing to shake things up to be contenders again, will they be open to the idea?
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1830984366375452977
After years of steering away from the 3-point line, the Lakers’ new head coach, JJ Redick, will attempt to reroute the team’s offensive course.
As the rest of the NBA continues to inch further out on offense, the Lakers remain one of the few teams still pushing inward.
Last season, Los Angeles had the second-highest shot frequency percentage (36%) at the rim in the league. a statistical marker that has become the bludgeoning trademark of the LeBron James and Anthony Davis era.
Since the star duo linked up in 2019, the Lakers have never ranked lower than sixth in the number of shots generated within four feet. Given the individual and combined strengths of James and Davis, alongside the value that attempts at the rim still carry, the strategy makes sense.
However, the scales may have moved too far in one direction.
A direct result of the team’s paint-heavy approach has been their inability to keep up with the rest of the league’s perimeter shift. Whether due to roster construction or gameplan, the Lakers have yet to finish outside the bottom ten in 3-point shot frequency during James and Davis’ tenures.
Last season, they arguably hit rock bottom as they finished with the second-lowest rate in the league despite posting arguably their best 3-point shooting season in franchise history.
The team’s continued aversion to the deep ball is not so much a faux pas within the current basketball landscape but an Achilles heel that has put a mathematical ceiling on their championship outlook.
Even the most ornery skeptics of analytics have to admit there is a correlation between the three and offensive success. This past season, the Boston Celtics exemplified this as they shot their way to a championship.
Beyond just Boston — who attempted more threes than any other team in the NBA last year — the postseason also highlighted the impact spacing still has for several clubs, including the Dallas Mavericks, who attempted the second-most threes.
In an article back in June, Tom Haberstroh pointed out that teams that won the made 3-point column went 60-17 this postseason. That’s the highest mark since the NBA moved the 3-point line back in 1998. The Celtics, specifically, went 15-0 in such games.
This is not to say the Lakers should abandon bullying teams in the paint, but rather, strike a careful balance of modernizing their profile. An aim that is likely at the top of mind for the team’s new head coach, JJ Redick.
Redick, a prolific shooter in his own right, has already been vocal about what he envisions for the Lakers’ offense and the role that 3-pointers will play. Beyond signaling he will use “math,” Redick has also namedropped which individual players he wants to let it fly more often and the type of system he wants to install.
Perhaps the most interesting breadcrumbs to Redick’s philosophy can be found within his comments regarding James’ utilization
With James set to turn 40 in December, Redick will attempt to walk the tightrope of managing his star’s workload while convincing him to alter his game in the process. The most prominent change potentially is James embracing a more off-ball role, which Redick hopes results in more threes.
While it remains to be seen if this transpires and to what degree, before he was hired as head coach, Redick and James had a spirited discussion about the role of analytics and the value of 3-pointers on their “Mind the Game” podcast.
The conversation, which was interesting on several levels, is even more compelling now as it was a sneak peek at the exact types of dialogues Redick will need to have with his team to modify their approach heading into the new season — James included.
There will be expected pushback, as James had during the podcast, but the key for Redick and his staff is to find an important middle ground.
“(You) certainly have to get buy-in and talk to him about how he wants to play,” Redick said about James. “Him and I have joked about this, but he shot over 40 percent from three this year. Like, I want him shooting threes.”
Outside communicating his point with his players on a human level, Redick will also have to reconfigure the Lakers’ offensive system schematically to manufacture more looks from deep.
Beyond their volume issue last season, Los Angeles also lacked versatility in their 3-point attack. Behind no consistent downhill threats, the Lakers had the second-lowest assist percentage off drives, which forced them to create from the inside out, highlighted by them finishing with the second-most post-ups per game.
It is also worth pointing out that despite their improved efficiency, the team’s shooters often were exclusively standstill options. As a team, the Lakers had the third-lowest percentage of off-screen chances, according to the league’s tracking data. Individually, they did not have a single player crack the top 50 in attempts.
While dramatically improved in the second half, the Lakers’ offense still felt predictable as a result. And at times, one-dimensional.
“One of the things last year with this team, they played a lot of random,” Redick said during Summer League. “If you look at the efficiency numbers, when they played random versus when they played out of sets, the sets had a much higher efficiency.
“It’s not that we’re going to call plays every time, but we’re going to put them in environments where they can make reads. Look, we have LeBron and AD on our team. Those guys are obviously going to be offensive hubs, but we are going to play with more movement, more cutting and we have to certainly get buy-in from all players to play that way.”
From a personnel perspective, there should be optimism that the Lakers can replicate their improved shooting last season and, with the right level of buy-in, as Redick stated, could also be more dynamic from a shooting and offensive standpoint. The latter is important for a team that has only one top-ten finish in offensive rating in the last five seasons.
Although the Lakers have had a love-hate relationship with the 3-point line in the past — mostly hate — at some point, the team will have to adapt or risk getting left behind.
Redick will have to wear many new hats as a first-time coach this upcoming year, but how well he can be the team’s 3-point whisperer and matchmaker could prove his most important.
-
Bravo, Alex. Superb on-point article detailing why Redick's embrace of 3-point revolution will be single most important offensive development in how the Lakers play over the last two decades.
Fascinated to see how last year's squad could do with JJ as head coach instead of Ham. https://t.co/ASXvLf9lng
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) September 3, 2024
-
I don’t think he needs to convince them. He just needs to add more 3 point opportunities to their playbook. We have guys that can them. Just run more plays for more 3 pointers.
-
Aloha, Michael, I believe just running plays to get more 3-point shots will not be enough for the Lakers to raise their 3-point attempts to middle of the pack. They’re going to need LeBron and AD to buy in and shoot and make threes too.
The Lakers as a team will still need to embrace volume 3-point shooting as a critical part of their game going forward because their established offensive style of play and natural tendency of their two superstars is to attack the rim, not to shoot a three. Suddenly shooting 35-40 threes instead of 31 per game is not going to happen easily, especially if we trade D’Angelo Russell.
When push comes to shove, LeBron James and Anthony Davis are going to attack the rim rather than shoot a three. Now maybe JJ can convince LeBron to fire away and maybe running plays will help, but the Lakers are not going to be able to keep up with teams like Boston and Dallas who want to shoot 40 threes per game unless they embrace the 3-point shot.
While I have high hopes for JJ, I think it will be a struggle for the Lakers to embrace the 3-point shot because it hasn’t been part of their game and it will take a complete reversal of how they play for the three to have a proper role on this team. Until JJ can get everybody, including LeBron and AD aboard, don’t expect the Lakers to easily embrace the 3-point revolution.
-
-
-
This briefly touches on the reasons why we shoot fewer threes and quickly pivots into the standard “Why” and “Maybe” packages and then devolves from there into hyperbolic “reporting”.
Fact:
There are really 3 current Lakers we should expect to shoot 5+ 3 point FGA/game and they are (in order) LeBron James, D’Angelo Russell, Austin Reaves. Nobody else will get the required minutes or simply isn’t skilled enough to be a volume three point shooter. Wild Card on this one goes to Max Christie who shot decently in terms of accuracy but hasn’t seen enough realistic game time to justify such volume, at this time. Double Bonus Wild Card goes to rookie Dalton Knecht…who is a rookie and hasn’t ever played close to 82 games with this kind of travel, defense, further out 3 point line, etc. I hope he can show himself to be capable of the trust of 5+/game but that jury is waaaaay out.But wait, that’s, on average, only 15 three pointers…how will we even get to 35-40/game? I don’t think we will, nor do I think we should given the current roster construction. This team is still built for inside the arc basketball unless someone takes a big step forward (Vando?).
Fact:
Other than LeBron James we have zero players capable of being a consistent drive and kick threat. Not Reaves, DLo, Vincent, JHS, or anyone else currently on the roster. They lack either the vision, read/react skills/athleticism, or a combination of all 3. Drive and kick threats that actually create gravity with the defense are few and far between. Usually they are limited in shooting, defense or both. Catch and shoot threes, especially from the corner, are some of the absolute best shots you can get in a half court set in the game. We consistently lack the personnel in either the shooting or driving and kicking…or both…aspects. So blame Rob and Magic on this one.Fiction:
The Lakers have declared a war on the three point line as this articles…and some bloggers…consistently insist. If it’s a war it’s a cold one as every single coach since Byron Scott has publicly endorsed more three point shooting and analytics. From Luke Walton to Darvin Ham every single Lakers coach in modern times (and Mike “Goofballs’ D’Antoni, too) has proclaimed during media day, training camp and early in the season that three pointer is both a viable and dangerous weapon along with it being something the team needs to embrace. So what happens? Some of our best players pass up open shots. Our best offensive weapon is definitely AD or LeBron at the rim, by a country mile. That in turn leads to more free throws (a stat we rank in the top ten in every season since LeBron and AD teamed up).In short the players who control the offense, LBJ and AD, are the ones most responsible (outside Rob for being a moron) for the lack of three point shooting. One could argue we should run more plays designed to get a shooter open but the cast of characters around James and Davis has changed so much and so dramatically every season since AD came here it makes that kind of chemistry nigh impossible. That’s not even to say this is the duo’s 3rd coach since winning a title together, which also hampers the effort to modernize and develop anything consistent.
Good things take time. Nobody pulls an amazing team out of their ass with a few trades or role-player swaps. Changes on the margin just make so very much more sense, to me anyhow. Look back at the dynasties for guidance if you think I’m full of BS. There were solid cores of 5+ players on every single one of those multiple title-winning teams.
Magic, Cap, Cooper, Worthy, Wilkes/Scott, Rambis (one could argue Nixon, as well).
Kobe, Shaq, Fisher, Fox, Horry, Lue, Shaw, Madsen(?)
Kobe, Gasol, Odom, Walton, Farmar, Vujacic, Brown, Bynum
Those three teams won 10 NBA titles. That’s a starting line up and a bench that isn’t in the “trade machine” or dumped for a mega personality, or anything absurd like that. They built an actual team, left it mostly alone…with the same coach…and were content to let it grow.
What a notion in these “modern” times…
-
You don’t think Rui can help in the 3 point department Jamie? He led the team in % at .422. And was even better at a starter at 43% on 4 attempts. I don’t feel it’s a stretch to find Rui an extra shot a game. Poor Rui is so disrespected. 16.7 ppg, on 57% from the field and the for mentioned 43% from 3 as the 5th option. A lot of teams would love that from their 3rd option. The Lakers went 21 and 8 once he joined the other starters and they were a plus 7 with Rui starting with the other starters.
-
I just don’t expect him to get many more attempts per game than 4 or so. When we talk about some stationary number of team attempts/game my questions will always come back to “Who is taking them, when, how and from where?” We’ll see what role he has on this team, especially if Vando and Vincent are healthy and contributing. I generally toss a lot of the prior season out the window with the new coach and some guys filling minutes he (in theory) had.
-
-
-
I’m hoping JJ can get the Lakers to embrace the three and run offense to generate the kinds of looks we need to shoot 35-40 threes per game. Unfortunately, I tend to agree with jamie that it’s going to take time and probalby some new players to get the Lakers to fully embrace the 3-point shot.
The key is LeBron James. That’s why the intriguing conflict between JJ and LeBron about James shooting threes is going to be the key. The way to change the Lakers offensive dynamic would be LeBron and DLO taking 10 threes per game. That’s the only way I see Lakers getting up 35-40 good threes. Jamie is right. You can’t turn most players who take 2-4 threes per game into guys willing and able to take 6-8 threes per game.
It’s the old inside-out vs. outside-in argument. The old school game is obviously inside-out, which we know can work. The new school game is outside-in, which can also work. Since the Lakers already are a great inside-out team, they should not give that up.
But they do need to adjust their game to be able to keep up with the rapidly increasing number of threes being taken and to give their offense better balance and unpredictability. For this season, 35 threes per game would be a good and reasonable target. More than that is not likely with the personnel we currently have.
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1830984505630576645
Jerami Grant – Portland Trail Blazers
Any scenario to land Grant would likely involve Rui Hachimura, Gabe Vincent, and either Christian Wood or Cam Reddish, but none of these players truly benefit Portland in any way. This now leads to the Lakers having to find a third and fourth team to potentially facilitate the trade, which would be near impossible this close to training camp. Aside from figuring out the logistics of making the money work this season, the Lakers would be very pressed for cap space and tax relief moving forward if they were to add Grant.
The idea is appealing to the Lakers, but it is hard to imagine that a deal involving Grant will come to fruition right now.
Cam Johnson – Brooklyn Nets
The question is whether or not the Lakers have the draft assets that the Nets are searching for in trade talks this offseason. Los Angeles can’t trade a first-round pick until 2029 at the earliest, and it is unknown if Pelinka would want to sacrifice what could wind up being a valuable asset in the post-LeBron era. The Nets have been asking for multiple draft picks in proposals for Johnson, leading to the belief that the Lakers may not have the capability to pull off this type of trade.
Kyle Kuzma – Washington Wizards
Perhaps the biggest assessment here regarding the Lakers possibly exploring the idea of bringing back Kuzma is the fact that he very unlikely wants to play with Davis and James again. With the Lakers, Kuzma was put into a box and had to play a catch-and-shoot role on the perimeter. Since joining the Wizards, Kuzma has showcased his full offensive repertoire and has proven that he can be a focal point for a team. Unfortunately, that is not the role he held in Los Angeles, and it isn’t the role he would hold upon possibly returning.
This is certainly a long-shot scenario. Nonetheless, Kuzma remains on the trade block and will hear his name in rumors once again leading up to the 2025 trade deadline.
Bruce Brown – Toronto Raptors
If the Lakers were to seriously pursue Brown between now and the start of the 2024-25 season, they would undoubtedly need to include Hachimura in trade discussions with the Raptors due to the fact that he is only 26 years old and presents upside as a scorer at the power forward position next to Scottie Barnes. Last offseason, the Raptors did show interest in Gabe Vincent, sources said. It is unknown at this time if the Raptors would still be interested in Vincent after trading for and extending Immanuel Quickley.
From the Lakers point of view, Brown would be the ideal type of player to target due to the fact that he is in the final year of his contract and can wear multiple hats next to James and Davis.
Nikola Vucevic – Chicago Bulls
The best part about pursuing Vucevic from the Lakers’ perspective is that they wouldn’t need to break the bank to acquire him. Chicago isn’t going to be getting first-round picks for the veteran center, so Los Angeles could potentially get him at a discounted rate of Rui Hachimura and Christie Wood.
Overall, the Lakers upgrade their frontcourt and scoring depth while also remaining below the second apron tax line. Attach two second-round picks to a deal that includes both Wood and Hachimura, and all of a sudden, you have yourself a deal that the Bulls would likely accept.
Jordan Clarkson – Utah Jazz
Any trade that Los Angeles would look to make with Utah would certainly involve at least one other team due to Hachimura and/or Gabe Vincent likely being on the move — two players the Jazz would hold zero interest in.
As far as bench scoring and extra depth in the backcourt goes, Clarkson is certainly an option on the trade market for the Lakers and any other team that would be looking for a veteran scoring guard.
-
LAKERS TARGETS
……………………………
BLAZERS:
-Jerami Grant
-Robert Williams IIIRAPTORS:
-Kelly Olynyk
-Bruce BrownBUCKS:
-Brook Lopez
-Bobby PortisWIZARDS:
-Malcolm Brogdon
-Jonas ValanciunasBULLS:
-Zach LaVine
-Lonzo BallJAZZ:
-Walter Kessler
-Jordan ClarksonGRIZZLIES:
Marcus Smart
Brandon ClarkeNETS:
Cam Johnson
DayRon Sharpe-
All moves that’ll drain the Lakers of what little assets they have for the future and trade 2 productive players for one slightly more productive player. Should increase their projected wins from 44 1/2 to maybe 46. Not worth it. Not going to happen.
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1830450291109417051
This offseason, the Lakers have got their name linked to prominent trade candidates despite their failure to land any of them. However, amid all the tussle, their most tradeable star, Rui Hachimura, might’ve found a suitor for himself, at least an upcoming proposal. The 26-year-old can get off the Lakers train as a potential replacement for two role players from the East Conference. If that happens, the Lakers will land assets contractually worth $54 million.
With the plan of making a young core and having viable first-round picks, the Hornets are shaping up for the future. As part of their goal, they moved on Terry Rozier, Gordon Hayward, and PJ Washington for future draft picks. Following the chain, the next ones in line are Vasilije Micic and Cody Martin. The 30-year-old guard inked a three-year $23.5 million contract with the OKC. So, the contract continued when he moved to the Hornets last season.
Similarly, Cody Martin is on a 4 million $31 million contract. Altogether, both of them are not in sync with the Hornets’ ambitions but might be an asset to the Lakers. Also, Cody Martin is eligible to sign an extension, as he is in the third year of his contract. With a 140% hike in his last year’s $8.6 million salary, he can get as much as $12.1 million/year. Such staggering numbers, in addition to the 8% per year surge, will amount to about a $54 million contract for Martin.
However, the veteran, who will turn 31 soon, might be more of a liability than an asset. That’s why the Hornets might be yearning for the younger Rui Hachimura. The Lakers could trade Rui Hachimura for Martin and Micic. Wondering why? Both of them come at low cost, and the Lakers have two role players for the trade of one.
1 Comment-
Click baiters lack of knowledge continues to amaze me. We have 15 players we can not do a 2 for one. And Cody Martin isn’t nearly as good as Rui. Perhaps he’s thinking of his twin brother Caleb who is a pretty good player. And Micic would be our 3rd string PG. He’s not as good as Vincent. Especially on the defensive side. So why?
-
-
Michael H wrote a new post
Aloha,
I was just thinking of the talent the Lakers have drafted or signed as non drafted players. It’s pretty impressive. I’ve included players received using a Lakers first round pick.
Guards
DLO
Lonzo
Austin
Hart
Caruso
Max
Dyson Daniel’s promising 6’ 8” pg picked by the Pels
Dalton KnectSF
BI
Jayden McDaniels TWolves
Deandre Hunter HawksPF
Randle
KuzmaCenter
ZubacThat would be a pretty good team. It’s a testament to Rob’s brilliant leadership that we don’t have more to show for it.
-
3 All-Stars (who probably didn’t really warrant it), none as Lakers. Guys they missed on have led their teams to championships. Just plenty of boneheaded decisions by management. Too much placating of Lebron and the Klutch Klowns. Sad management decisions likely spurred on by clueless ownership.
-
-
You could make that argument, but his own team would disagree. Of the 3, he’s probably the only one who was maybe worth an all-star nod. Knicks pretty much wanted to get rid of him at any chance and immediately regretted paying him. The NY cred bump is real. But yes, the idiocy of the FO letting him just walk was just as real.
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1829919420828787152
The Los Angeles Lakers, who were eliminated in the first round of the 2024 playoffs, look to be entering September without making a meaningful move during the offseason. Outside of drafting Dalton Knecht and Bronny James, the Lakers haven’t added a player in free agency or a trade.
With 15 guaranteed contracts on the books and right below the second apron, the Lakers are in a tough position regarding trades and signing players. Still, there are ways for Los Angeles to add players, and Dan Favale of Bleacher Report believes there’s one player on the market they should target.
Favale listed “landing spots for the 5 best NBA free agents still on the market,” which included Cedi Osman. He listed the Lakers as the landing spot for the sharpshooter.
“Over the past three seasons, the 29-year-old is downing more than 57 percent of his twos and 37 percent of his threes. Just seven other players have hit those marks while also draining as many treys as Osman (330): Duncan Robinson, Corey Kispert, Trey Murphy, Sam Hauser, Al Horford, Michael Porter Jr. and Kevin Durant.
“Remove the marquee names from that list, and you’re still looking at a couple of useful NBA players. Osman is worth a roster spot for rotations in need of shot-making from the wing positions,” Favale wrote on August 30. “Enter the Los Angeles Lakers. Exactly none of their wings or combo forwards are considered knockdown shooters. Osman would upgrade their spacing at minimum, and his willingness to move without the ball should fit cleanly within head coach JJ Redick’s (presumed) offensive tenets.”
How the Lakers Could Sign Cedi Osman
If the Los Angeles Lakers were to sign any free agents, they’d either have to make a trade or cut a player to open a roster spot.
There are options for them to do so on their roster.
Favale named three players who could be cut by the Lakers, writing that it’s “absolutely worth doing.”
“Los Angeles already has 15 guaranteed contracts on the books (and is a heartbeat away from the second apron),” Favale wrote. “It’ll have to grease the wheels of a Jaxson Hayes, Christian Wood or Cam Reddish trade to make room for Osman—a minor nuisance that, as of now, is absolutely worth doing.”
Osman, 6-foot-7, has a similar build to Cam Reddish, who’s 6-f00t-8, so he’d be a clear replacement for the No. 10 pick of the 2019 NBA draft.
How Osman Would Help the Lakers
The Los Angeles Lakers need to address their lack of 3-point shooting after attempting the fewest 3-point attempts per game a season ago.
Osman attempted the fewest 3-point attempts of his career since his rookie season in the NBA, with 3.1 last year. However, in prior seasons, he’s attempted more than 5.0 per game with good efficiency.
In the 2021-22 campaign, he shot 35.7% from 3-point range on 5.4 attempts per game. Adding a shooter of his caliber next to LeBron James and Anthony Davis, who should help him get more open looks than ever before, would be intriguing for the Lakers’ offense.
Training camp opens for all teams on September 25, so the Lakers have some decisions to make before then.
-
DJ2KB24 wrote a new post
Saddle again, yea!
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1829214335597736333
Los Angeles Lakers
Kyrie Irving, PG, Dallas Mavericks
LeBron James has heaped nothing but praise on his former teammate over the past few years. If there was any sort of indication that Irving was unhappy in Dallas, the Lakers should check on his asking price, especially since Irving can become an unrestricted free agent in 2025.
Irving, James and Anthony Davis would be an incredible Big 3 and provide closure on what was an unhappy ending for the former Cleveland Cavaliers teammates.
LaMelo Ball, PG, Charlotte Hornets
If the Hornets appear headed for another lost season and really want to dive into the Cooper Flagg sweepstakes, trading Ball would certainly increase their tanking efforts.
Showtime would officially be back in Los Angeles with Ball, the most entertaining passer in the NBA today. He’s also a talented scorer (23.9 points per game last season) who would take a ton of offensive pressure off of James.
Darius Garland, PG, Cleveland Cavaliers
Garland, like James and Davis, is a Klutch client who would bring some stability to the point guard position with the Lakers.
The 24-year-old is a terrific passer who would also benefit off open three-point looks when James operates with the ball.
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1828450659454349562
Every offseason, NBA fans have to listen to rumors about how the Los Angeles Lakers will get the top free agents or make the big trades needed to win their next NBA championship. It doesn’t matter how unlikely or how improbable, the allure of the Lakers is too strong to be ignored.
The Lakers are hoping to return to contention with LeBron James, Anthony Davis and rookie head coach JJ Redick. But they are also preparing for life without James, who is going to retire within the next few years. Some players can take the mantle of the next face of the Lakers, per Kevin O’Connor of The Ringer, but the team feels confident in their ability to convince Dallas Mavericks point guard Luka Doncic to be the franchise’s future.
“I’ve reported on this podcast and on The Ringer how they have their sights set for Luka [Dončić] in the future. We’ll see if that works out. Dallas just made a Finals, Dallas is looking better than ever with their supporting cast. That may not work out, but the Lakers by not trading their future picks clearly are still thinking long-term at this point. They’re not going all in like you might expect many teams to do with James.”
Lakers already scheming for how to acquire Luka Doncic
Doncic is easily one of the top players in the league just in his first six seasons. He won the NBA Rookie of the Year in 2019, was named a first-team All-NBA selection and is the reigning scoring champion by averaging 33.9 points per game. Doncic is easily one of the most explosive and efficient scorers in the leagues and continues to find ways to make himself and his team better.In terms of being the future of the NBA, Doncic is more than capable of assuming the mantle. He could add much more to his legacy if he were to join the Lakers with more exposure, being given the celebrity treatment and given a bigger stage to international players.
3 Comments-
-
This has been out there for awhile. LeBron even said that Luka will play for the Lakers. Luka has a player option coming up in a couple of years. Assuming Austin opts out of his option, which is likely, the Lakers will be sitting on only 86 mil in guaranteed contracts. A lot will depend on what Dallas will do in the next few years. But if they don’t win it all the Lakers will be in a good position. Kind of like the 76ers were this year.
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
https://x.com/LakerTom/status/1828110403702005784
The Los Angeles Lakers are toeing the line between inactivity and significant improvement. The roster is generally the same, sans the addition of rookies Dalton Knecht and Bronny James, but the organization has taken steps to improve its infrastructure.
The latest decision on that front could go a long way toward improving the weakest area of organizational consistency and success.
Los Angeles replaced former head coach Darvin Ham with JJ Redick just before the 2024 NBA Draft. It’s since executed a complete overhaul of its coaching staff and strategic approach to team-building, prioritizing player development along the way.
The Lakers have continued that shift in priorities by hiring Dr. Leroy Sims as the new Director of Player Performance and Health.
This might seem like a decision that can be glossed over in the short-term, but it speaks to the organization’s awareness of its most glaring flaw.
Lakers hope to address glaring injury concerns
The Lakers’ general health and availability have been misinterpreted following the 2023-24 season. All of Anthony Davis, Rui Hachimura, LeBron James, Austin Reaves, and D’Angelo Russell appeared in at least 68 games last season, thus resulting in the belief that injuries weren’t an issue.
The entire second unit was ravaged by injuries, however, thus resulting in Los Angeles’ bench ranking among the worst in the NBA.
Gabe Vincent was the Lakers’ marquee signing last offseason, but appeared in just 11 games during the regular season due to injury. Jarred Vanderbilt, who signed a four-year, $48 million contract extension, was active in just 29 outings.
Christian Wood, meanwhile, missed 32 games and Cam Reddish was absent for 34—thus making it almost impossible for the second unit to find its footing.
The end result was Los Angeles ranking 27th in the NBA in offensive rating. It was a shining example of what prevented the starting lineup’s impact from being sustained during games against the top contenders in the Association.
By hiring Sims, the Lakers have made a clear commitment to resolving the injury issues and potentially creating a sustainable resolution to their primary flaw.
The ideal outcome would be the Lakers remaining healthy enough to create a steady pace through the regular season. It’s something the team has been generally unable to do throughout the Davis and James era, thus resulting in lower seedings come the postseason.
If the hiring has the expected impact, then the Lakers could finally secure the elusive top-four seed that would simplify the process of making another deep postseason run.
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
-
Jamie Sweet wrote a new post
-
Aloha Jamie, I may not be as concerned by the defense as a lot of folks. Although the center position does concern me. We were shredded when AD rested. The first part of the year we had one of the better defensive rankings in the league but we often found ourselves 10 to 14 points behind by the end of the first quarter. When we went with the offensive line up that stopped happening. I think that Vando and Gabe will be big for us if they can stay healthy. Last year we simply did not have guys to bring in when we really needed tough defense. I’m hoping that growth from some of our younger guys will help our defense. Last year Austin’s defense started to improve, towards the end of the year, hopefully that trend continues. Rui is actually a pretty good on ball defender. His problem was more about getting lost in his rotations and he found himself chasing the play at times. Fortunately that is something that is easier to correct than on ball ability. His defensive rating was 113.9 as a starter, while the teams rating was 118 over that stretch. I also have high hopes for Max. He did look very good at times on defense, he made young guy mistakes but NBA defense is the last to develop. Hopefully he will be more consistent. Woods defense was better than advertised when he played the 4. While the sample size was small the front line of LeBron. AD and Wood were plus 22 per 100 possession. Jackson isn’t bulky enough to bang but hopefully he can learn to use that athleticism to do a better job of protecting the rim. This team has a lot of fire power so if we can improve the defense some we can be dangerous. Still hoping we can find a banger at some point.
-
I’m ho early not too worried at all about scoring the ball, stopping the other team is a big concern for me.
-
-
-
-
Available centers:
1. Wendel Carter Jr.
2. Walker Kessler
3. Clint Capella
4. Brandon Clark
5. DaRon Sharpe
6. Robert Williams III
7. Nick Richards
8. Jonas Valanciunas
9. Jacob Poeltl -
— Grading the offseason: D-
— The GOAT debate: LeBron or MJ? MJ and it’s not remotely close
— Which bruising bigs make sense for LA on the trade market? Don’t matter, they could’ve signed JV if Lebron weren’t full of it about taking a paycut
— Who will be the next Laker to have their jersey retired? They’ll probably give it to James, even though his Laker tenure was a disappointment
— Are the Lakers being overlooked? Nope, they’ll be a bottom seed at best
-
- Load More Posts
I’ve always been a big Lonzo fan and would support any trade to get him back. He is still the perfect 2-way point guard for LeBron and AD. Would be a gamble but Lonzo w/b great fit.