The Realest: D'Angelo Russell And The Los Angeles Lakers https://t.co/EqPqPT0RRu
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) September 25, 2024
Since rejoining the Los Angeles Lakers at the 2023 trade deadline, Russell has been a galvanizing force by being a stabilizing one. Whereas the Lakers were a tinderbox of bad play and worse feelings with Russell Westbrook running point, Russell allowed them to be a normal basketball team that plays good basketball.
Over the last two years, the Lakers have won 62 percent of their 93 games with Russell and just 42 percent of their 62 without him. During that same time frame, the Lakers have outscored opponents by 4.62 points per 100 possessions with Russell on the court, but been outscored by 1.82 points per 100 possessions without him. At the risk of oversimplifying things, Russell’s impact represents the difference between the Lakers being the Knicks and being the Bulls.
On the court, Russell is a study in control, both of the ball and of himself. Even if his 18.0 points and 6.3 assists per game seem somewhat pedestrian, he’s one of the most skilled guards in the league; the ball goes where he wants it to go. More and more, people (people, meaning Russell himself) are saying that he’s an elite shooter whose versatility and marksmanship are rivaled only by Stephen Curry and Damian Lillard. Last season, Russell was one of just five players to score more than 400 points on both catch-and-shoot and pull-up jumpers.
Beyond his perimeter shooting, Russell excels in all the areas where point guards are expected to excel. As a pick-and-roll ball-handler, he scored 5.6 points per game, the most on the team; his 3:1 assist to turnover ratio was also the best on the team. With the ball in his hands, Russell rejects the typical vocabulary of basketball. He doesn’t slash or glide; he oozes. He finagles. In the pick and roll, he lazes a trail around screens, maneuvering into the heart of unaware defenses; he finds space to launch a jumper like a cat settling down in a sunbeam.
Still, Russell has been a disaster in the playoffs. In the first round last year, Russell averaged just 14.2 points per game on 48.1 percent True Shooting, which somehow represented an upgrade from the 13.3 points (on 51.6 percent True Shooting) that he averaged in the 2023 playoffs. Facing the very best defenders, Russell is too slow and too slender to pose too many problems. Even during the regular season, Russell doesn’t so much create shots as find them, plucking the low-hanging fruit that permissive mid-January defenses leave for him. Against postseason defenses, though, he can’t muster the required dynamism—his open shots become contested ones, his contested ones are completely snuffed out.
More, Russell loses his purpose in the playoffs. During the regular season, Russell serves a necessary function as James’s spotter; James is too old to marshall every possession, so Russell’s ability to keep the offense afloat across 82 games is very valuable. In the playoffs, Russell is shunted to the periphery as James reasserts his primacy. When James and Anthony Davis are at the center of every play, Russell is unnecessary.
For whatever reason, Russell hasn’t yet figured out how to complement James. Theoretically, they should be an easy fit—both can capably pass, dribble and shoot; they threaten defenses in different ways and occupy different spaces on the court. It’s easy to imagine them bouncing off each other like a Pacific coast version of Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, pushing defenses to their breaking point with their collective smarts and skill.
In this sense, Russell is an avatar for the complications of building around late-stage James: the players James needs to make the playoffs aren’t necessarily the same ones who can help him win once he gets there. Across the season, it’s probably smart to find ways to preserve James by taking the ball out of his hands when possible. In a single game, you should probably give the ball to James and get out of his way.
As such, Russell has a difficult job because he has two different identities, depending on the day. He’s James’ partner and his lackey; he’s the midpoint between frontman and footman. Co-star or bit part? For the Lakers to not squander LeBron’s final years, Russell has to be comfortable as both.
LakerTom says
This paragraph:
“Over the last two years, the Lakers have won 62 percent of their 93 games with Russell and just 42 percent of their 62 without him. During that same time frame, the Lakers have outscored opponents by 4.62 points per 100 possessions with Russell on the court, but been outscored by 1.82 points per 100 possessions without him. At the risk of oversimplifying things, Russell’s impact represents the difference between the Lakers being the Knicks and being the Bulls.”
therealhtj says
He’s still trash. Just less so than the alternatives.
Jamie Sweet says
The issue is complicated by the fact Reaves has (likely) hit his ceiling, at least on offense if he doesn’t get every call on his drives. Couple that with not much of a bench after DLo and AR. DK, JHS, and even Gabe Vincent are all pretty steep talent drop offs. Not one of them is a plus defender which is where I see this team as having the most problems. You don’t win titles with a flashy, splashy offense…not without a stout defense to go with it. AD and 40 year old LeBron are not enough. Hard to play all 3 of DLo, Vincent and Reaves and not give up the ghost. I’m sure folks will counter with “well that’s why we need to make a big trade!” but that’s not how we’re starting the season. We’re starting with this team, right here. So we’d better be a lot better than middle of the pack or even top ten to improve in last year’s squad, which one could argue, over-achieved in a lot of ways.