WELCOME TO LAKERHOLICS
A Virtual Community for Lakers Fans
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The only way the Los Angeles Lakers can upgrade their starting point guard, shooting guard, and center positions is to find trading partners able and willing to sign-and-trade for Dennis Schroder and Montrezl Harrell.
Otherwise, the Lakers simple don’t have the trading chips to do more than fill one of those three starting positions. Right now, the Lakers’ only major tradeable contracts are Kuzma’s and KCP’s $13 million annual contracts. Finding trading partners to pay Schroder the $25 million and Harrell the $15 million they’re seeking will be challenging but would give the Lakers the additional trading chips they need to rebuild their starting lineups.
So let’s take a look at which NBA teams could be interested in sign-and-trade deals for either Dennis Schroder or Montrezl Harrell and who also could have a player or players who would be good fits on the Lakers.
1. Kyle Lowry and the Toronto Raptors
The Lakers should obviously revisit the failed Schroder and Caldwell-Pope for Lowry deal that fell through at last season’s trade deadlline because the Lakers would not include young star Horton-Tucker as part of the package.
In retrospect, the Lakers and the Raptors both could have second thoughts about not going through with this deal as both teams’ seasons ended on a low note. The question is what would a resurrected trade look like today. The Lakers are in a pure win-now mode but aren’t willing to invest over $20 million per year on Dennis Schroder while the Raptors want to do right by Kyle Lowry but could benefit by swapping him for a younger point guard.
While the original deal is no longer viable, a straight up double sign-and-trade of Schroder for Lowry could make sense for both teams and prevent them from losing a star point guard to free agency with nothing in return.
2. Buddy Hield and Sacramento Kings
Another deal discussed last season the Lakers should revisit was the trade of Kyle Kuzma for the Kings’ Buddy Hield. The Lakers have long coveted Hield for his 3-point shooting while the Kings have long had their eyes on Kuzma.
Buddy Hield’s high volume, high percentage 3-point shooting is exactly what the Lakers need offensively while Kyle Kuzma enjoyed his best season ever playing under Kings’ coach Luke Walton when he coached the Lakers. With the emergence of rookie Tyrese Halliburton as the Kings’ starting shooting guard, Sacremento is looking to get off Hield’s big contract and could also use a quality scoring big to back up Richaun Holmes at center.
A trade of Kyle Kuzma and Montrezl Harrell for Buddy Hield would give the Lakers the elite 3-point shooting two guard they need while giving the Kings two elite role players who would upgrade their bench and roster.
3. Russell Westbrook and Washington Wizards
Russell Westbrook’s a mediocre 3-point shooter, only averaging 30.5% from deep for his career, and a turnover machine, averaging almost 5 per game, but he’s also a walking and talking triple-double averaging 22.2/11.5/11.7.
It’s hard to fathom what the Washington Wizard’s game plan is going forward but there’s a point where they need to trade Bradley Beal and Russell Westbrook and begin the long term task of rebuilding their roster. The win now Los Angeles Lakers need an upgrade a point guard over Dennis Schroder and Russell Westbrook would give them an elite triple-double point guard to complement LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
Trading Dennis Schroder, Kyle Kuzma, and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope for Russell Westbrook could give the Lakers the third superstar they need to compete against the Brooklyn Nets and their Superstar Big Three.
4. Devonte Graham and Malik Monk and the Charlotte Hornets
The Los Angeles Lakers are looking for high volume, high percentage 3-point shooters and the Charlotte Hornets need more front court size and diversity and showed interest in trading for Kuzma and Harrell last season.
With the emergence of LaMelo Ball as starting point guard, Terry Rozier has moved to starting shooting guard and the Hornets have a surplus of good 3-point shooting guards to be traded for more front court size and diversity. Charlotte needs upgrades at both the starting power forward and center positions to balance their guard and wing heavy roster. Kuzma would slide right into the starting power forwar slot while Harrell would be 6th man.
Trading Harrell and Kuzma for Graham and Monk should be a win-win for both the Lakers and the Hornets. The Lakers get desperately needed 3-point shooting in the backcourt while the Hornets get great depth at the 4 and 5.
11 Comments-
BUDDY HIELD TRADE
This is a trade that really makes sense for both the Lakers and the Kings and should be at the top of the list for both teams. Kuzma enjoyed his best season playing for Luke Walton and should be a perfect fit starting at power forward for the Kings. Harrelll would also be a great fit for Sacramento backing up Richaun Holmes, assuming they re-sign him.
For the Lakers, Buddy is the high volume, high percentage 3-point shooter they need to upgrade shooting guard and hlep modernize the Lakers 3-point attack. With Halliburton’s ascent, Hield is too expensive to come off the bench for the Kings.
-
LAKERS TRADE MACHINE!
Lakers get Buddy Hield and Marvin Bagley III.
Hield is high volume & percentage 3-point shooter>
Bagley is potential stretch 5 center.Kings get Kyle Kuzma, Montrezl Harrell, KCP.
Kuzma becomes starting 4.
Harrell becomes BU 5
KCP replaces Hield as BU 2 pic.twitter.com/Bvbyi6v9ES— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 4, 2021
-
-
RUSSELL WESTBROOK TRADE
Call me crazy but if there is a legitimate superstars out there for whom the Lakers could actually trade, it might be Russell Westbrook. Like CP3, pundits had written off Russ last year as being an albatross contract and a player who couldn’t win.
While I’m not a fan of Russ’ 3-point shooting and often question his shot selection and ball security, there’s no denying that he still has a lot in the tank and the idea of adding a triple-double machine like Westbrook to James and Davis is intoxicating.
The move would hard cap the Lakers and cause them to rely on vet minimum players for the rest of the roster but it would also give them a legitimate Superstar Big Three to challenge the Brooklyn Nets. The team that wins the championship next season will be a team with three genuine superstars.
-
-
Dame has to want out and it seems unlikely Portland would want to trade him in-conference.
-
-
-
GRAHAM AND MONK TRADE
This is another trade that makes a lot of sense for both teams. The Hornets have a surplus of guards and need forwards and centers. They showed interest in both Kuzma and Harrell last season.
While Charlotte has cap space, they will be looking to sign a center to replace Cody Zeller. Meanwhile, with the emergence of LaMelo Ball, they can move Terry Rozier to shooting guard and thus can trade both Devonte Graham and Malik Monk.
Graham would be the perfect point guard for a Lakers team with LeBron James. Devonte hiet 3.3 of 8.7 threes per game at 37.5% and Malik hit 2.0 of 5.1 for 40.1%. That’s exactly the kind of high volume, high percentage 3-point shooting the Lakers need.
-
One of the fascinating things that could easily happen this summer is a lot of teams hanging onto their trading chips waiting to see if Dame or Beal or Kawhi will really become available. There may be a chance for the Lakers to pull off a surprise deal for a second tier star like Lowry, Hield, Porzingis, Rozier, ior Walker because competing teams may not want to wait for bigger fish. That could benefit the Lakers if they push hard for a couple of deals.
Rob could certainly call up Masai and see if he were uinterested in a Schdoder-Lowry Double S&T? Or Sqcramento about a Kuzma for Buddy Trade, Washington about a Westbrook trade, or Charlotte about a Graham and Monk trade? The teams the Lakers will be competing with for these players are likely to be teams targeting bigger fish. This is why it doesn’t matter that other teams could make better offers for these players. The Lakers just have to have best offer made.
-
Soooo can we do 2 separate S&T’s? We can if we bring back a player under contract in at least one, I believe…
-
Each S&T deal has to stand on its own. There is no limit for how many S&T deals you can do. If any of the deals have a free agent coming to the Lakers in a S&T, then we are hard capped. Sending out free agents via S&T deals have no penalty.
-
So basically we can bring 1 player in via S&T and then we’re hard capped.
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
Aloha, Michael. LOL.
Best way never to miss is never to shoot.Of course, we kall now there was never a shot I didn’t like as a player and never a trade opportunityi I wouldn’t explore as a blogger.
-
Before the last two years, sign-and-trades were rare transactions because teams didn’t want to get hardcapped, players who were free agents didn’t want to the team they were going to lose assets, and matching salaries can be difficult due to base year compensation rules for sign-and-trades. In fact, from 2015 to 2019, there were only four cases of sign-and-trades.
That all changed the last two years when there has been a renaissance in sign-and-trades with over a dozen happening the last two years, including several with superstars as NBA teams have been on trading binges looking to add superstars and build superteams. Win-Now approach has revived sign-and-trades.
The increased competition between big market teams looking to win has resulted in a race to sign big time stars that’s seen more superstars and all-star players traded than any time in the league’s history. Trades, including sign-and-trades, have essentiaslly replaced free agency as the favored method for acquiring elite players in the NBA.
A side effect of the competition for stars has been teams wanting to use the non-taxpayer version of the MLE, the BAE, and sign-and-trades to acquire players. All three of these moves automatically hard cap a team. In fact, over half of the teams in the NBA last season were hard capped.
One of the unsung benefits of being hard capped is that you can’t overspend on your own players. While hard cap used to be what everybody avoided, the economic losses due to Covid-19 have made being hard capped as a form of fiscal restraint adoped by teams to force them to be financially sound.
While Jeanie Buss has said the Lakers will do what they have to, you only have to look at the Warriors, who are so far over the cap that adding a $10M per year player would cost them $50M in luxury taxes. In fact, there luxury tax bill will be between $50M and $100M. That’s not a sustainable situation even for a team with great revenues like the Warriors.
Bottom line, the Lakers need to take advantage of both outbound and inbound sign-and-trades to upgrade their starting roster. Otherwise, there is no way they can dramatically improve their roster. This years contenders were much better than last year’s and the competition will only get even better next season. Lakers need to go big, even if it costs them to be hard capped.
-
How the NBA Fell in Love With Sign-And-Trades, and Why They’re Not Going Anywhere by Chris Howson-Jan https://t.co/tjC4BXj8pc
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) June 29, 2021
-
It’s a solid tool and one that shouldn’t be wholly ignored. In our case it has to be used judiciously and wisely.
One would think that, in regards to the Lakers current capped out situation and based on the level of talent we could likely S&T for that an argument could be made to simply sign our own free agents and sit tight until December when the contracts become tradeable with zero repercussions. It’s not like the team was struggling pre-injuries, we were rolling.
If we S&T it has to be to bring in an elite player which feels nigh impossible based on our tradable assets (can’t trade Trezz if he doesn’t opt in and agree, which, based on his social media feels unlikely), Schroder would have to be making a mint and might be choosy about where he plays knowing he has a ton of leverage.
At any rate, I hope we use that tool as intelligently as possible. I’m not wholly against running it back with a few tweaks but would be more in favor of S&Ting Schroder into the Knicks cap or something like that as it would create a trade exception we could use at any point in the season. Convincing a small market team to HC themselves isn’t outside the realm of possibility, not sure another mass media market team wants to put the restraints on right when they are ascending again, same as us.
Like we’ve been saying for awhile there are areas that we cannot hard cap ourselves in: training staff, assistant coaches, etc. We need to be an elite team in those areas to be more attractive to guys who we may be asking to take a pay cut to stay.
-
Thanks for reading and commenting, Jamie.
Obviously, I’m a big fan of the Lakers taking advantage of outbound and inbound sign-and-trades. Sign-and-trades give the Lakers $50 million in additional trading chips for their own free agents and a greatly expanded list of elite targets with respect to other team’s free agents. Need to take advantage of outbound sign-and-trades for sure and probably inbound too.
I think the single biggest mistake the Lakers could make is to go way over the luxury tax threshold by re-signing everybody to new contracts. That could theoretically cost the Lakers as much as $50 million in luxury taxes to re-sign Schroder, Harrell, THT, and Caruso. When you start paying 3 to 5 times in taxes for every player you sign, it’s as paralyzing as being hard capped.
The time for the Lakers to rebuild their starting lineup is in the offseason. Trying to wait until next midseason would be a bad mistake. Teams have so many more options in the offseason. The Lakers in particular will need their draft pick as a sweetener and logically should also include THT, who’s not going to be a major contributor to a LeBron James championship.
Finally, I do think there is something to the idea of the hard cap forcing teams to be more fiscally responsible. The Lakers can fit in one more big contract (like Hield or Beasley or Lowry) and still be able to build out a championship roster with the MLE and vet minimum contracts. Just need to get the right pieces.
Right now, Terance Mann is what the Lakers were hoping THT would be, Reggie Jackson what they hoped Schroder would be, and Zubac what they hoped Drummond would be. Lakers overvalued their role players due to the Bubble Championship. They can’t wait unti the middle of next season to fix this roster, especially the starting lineup that has three player who aren’t good enough to start for a championship team.
-
I don’t see the Lakers wanting to restrain themselves and I would imagine that the few tools that are available in the regular season ought not to be pooh-poohed away so easily. Dennis Schroder is the perfect example of an offseason everyone thought went right that went wrong in ways nobody could have foreseen. If it’s a true top tier, elite player: bring on the hard cap. If it’s Buddy or Lonzo, thanks but I’ll pass. We can get guys who augment AD and LBJ without the hard cap. We can trade for Buddy straight up, if the Kings want to, Lonzo is a lateral and isn’t the kind of superstar that can run the team if AD and/or Davis goes down again , anyhow.
The first thing we honestly need to get right has nothing to do with the roster. It has to do with boosting our training staff and assistant coaches, especially with at least Kidd finding a head coach gig. We can’t cap out in those areas and my hope is that we see the Lakers lure a solid coach that could step in if they decide not to go with Vogel. Lakers need to get creative in a lot of areas outside of building out the roster.
In short, I can count on one hand the players I would say are worth hard-capping ourselves for and many of them aren’t even likely to be made available over the summer. Thus it stands to reason that going over to sign movable parts makes as much sense as any other path. Hell, even keeping the pick isn’t the worst idea, it’s not like we’re dangling anything close to a lottery pick it’s near the end of the first round. Cost-controlled talent is a must for the Lakers.
-
-
-
Lakers trading chips in no outbound sign-and-trades:
KCP – $13.0M
Kyle Kuzma – $13.0M
Marc Gasol – 2.7MAssuming Harrell declines player option.
Lakers additional trading chip with outbound sign-and-trades:
Dennis Schroder – $23.0M
Montrezl Harrell – $15.0M
THT – $10.0M
Alex Caruso – $6.0M…………………..
Lakers targets if no inbound sign-and-trades:
Myles Turner
Buddy Hield
Malik Beasley
Kemba WalkerLakers targets with inbound sign-and-trades:
Kyle Lowry
Chris Paul
Lonzo Ball
Tim Hardaway, Jr.
John Collins
Jarrett Allen
Nerlens Noel
Norman Powell
Spencer Dinwiddie
Victor Oladipo
Derrick Rose
Richaun Holmes
Kendrick Nunn
Lauri Markkanen
Bobby Portis
TJ McCollum
Reggie Jackson
Terance Mann
Evan Fournier
Kelly Oubre, Jr.-
Don’t forget McKinnie who’s deal is NG which could help either open up a shred of space for us or give a team some flexibility (again, just a shred) of their own.
-
Thanks, Jamie. Guaranteeing his contract could be what we need to consummate a specific trade. Without sign-and-trades, our cupboard is pretty bare.
-
-
-
I don’t think we necessarily need the shackles of the hard cap to restrain us from going too far into the luxury tax. Despite being one of the most valuable franchises in all of sports, we often pinch pennies..many times needlessly and as a detriment to the team. Jeanie ain’t going too deep into the tax.
-
That’s true, Mongo. I think there’s a psychological advantage to getting hard capped as it does remove pressure to make crazy trades or go deep in the luxury tax. I do agree Jeanie isn’t going to follow the Warriors lead and go deep into the tax period. I do think the expanded target list of whom we can go after if we’re willing to be hardcapped as well as the higher MLE that will be available are too important for us to pass even if it hard caps us and costs us some of our currently overrated depth.
As much as I hate to admit it, the Clippers front office and the role players they signed have been dramatically better than the ones the Lakers signed. Mann and Jackson have been elite. PG has been a superstars. Zubac has played great. Even Beverley has had a huge impact. That’s why we can’t stick with the current roster and run it back. It may have been good enough in the Bubble but not now.
-
Different roster than what we had in the Bubble. No Green, no Rondo, no Howard and no McGee. Sacrificed “offense” (which turned out to be fool’s gold for banner winning defense. Always felt odd to me, still does.
Letting so many of the young players we drafted and cultivate walk for nothing will have repercussions for several more seasons. Didn’t even get meager draft compensation for the likes of Zubac…so silly.
-
We had a good run a few years back finding real good dudes late in the draft, might need some of that voodoo back. But let’s be honest, even Laker Haters in the media were saying we won the off-season last year.
-
-
-
Here’s my biggest issue with all these trade scenarios…Kuz, KCP, Dennis, Caruso..they’ve all pretty much hit their ceiling. Teams don’t wanna trade premium assets for that. All those dudes we traded for AD were still on the come-up (and Rich Paul left NO No choice..lol). That’s why teams keep insisting on THT, still has potential. And Trez ain’t opting in to do us any favors. Probably our 3rd best player last year & we jacked him around at the end. Somebody gonna pay him.
-
Which is exactly why we need to be able to sign-and-trade some of our free agents, including Schroder, Harrell, Horton-Tucker, and Caruso. Otherwise, we have enough trading chips in Kuz, KCP, and #22 to maybe upgrade one starting position.
Like I said, we need a major overhaul but only have assets for an oil change. Bottom line, THT and the picks need to be included. We would have been in much better shape had we included THT and made the Lowry trade.
-
I agree that we need to shore up 1, 2 & 5. I’ve no objection to S&T, but I’m skeptical that Trezz and Dennis will play ball. Let them go and cut our losses in that case, especially Dennis as I worry that without care he could become our next Luol Deng. I’d sign Dwight Howard to a vet min contract and focus on the guard situation, at 1 & 2 both. Kemba Walker seems a reasonable and attainable choice for 1, so I’d go with that; it will probably cost us Kuzz, KCP and more. (I hope we won’t lose to the Clips in that potential battle.) Then we either keep and further develop THT or S&T him with picks to get a good shoooting guard. Of course, in the unlikely even Dennis & Trezz cooperate with S&T, we can try for Evan Fournier. Rob has his work cut out.
-
Thanks for reading and posting, Dean. Always appreciate how respectful you are on Twitter so happy to see you finally stopping by and commenting.
There’s really no motivation for Dennis and Trezz to agree to a sign-and-trade so it’s up to Pelinka to find situations where a team without cap space is willing to overpay to trade for Shroder or Harrell … or THT or Caruso.
As for re-signing Dwight, I understand why so many Lakers fans want that but he did not play well for the Sixers in the playoffs and essentially became unplayable as they progressed in the playoffs.
I still think the Lakers had personality reasons for not wanting to re-sign Dwight last offseason and don’t expect that to change this season.
I do think our focus will be on the 1 and 2 rather than center although I could argue that stabliizing the center position – and avoiding the disaster of wasting our MLE on Drummond who’s a terrible fit – should have a higher priority.
I think Kemba is an excellent option and upgrade over Schroder. My only concern is it will surely take both of our key trading chips – Kuz and KCP – to pull off that deal because of matching salaries, which means we likely won’t have trade assets to improve the 2 or 5 other than the MLE. Yes, the Clips may have more pieces to trade for Kemba.
Fournier would be an excellent target and Schroder might be an attractive piece for the Celtics. I would support that move.
-
-
-
I’m not even sure THT’s potential ceiling is enough to to get teams to take Kuz, KCP, or Dennis. But..we gotta try.
-
It’s at least the equivalent of another first round pick, maybe even a lottery pick. THT & #22 are the sweeteners.
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The Philadelphia 76ers’ playoff loss and Ben Simmons’ shooting woes may have given the Los Angeles Lakers an out-of-the-box opportunity to trade for the 24-year old point guard and turn him into a small ball point center.
While it might be a long shot considering the competition and the Lakers’ need for shooting, the idea of Superstar Big Three front court of LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and Ben Simmons could transform the Lakers. Imagine the Lakers next season with a modern defense anchored by 6′ 9,” 250 lbs LeBron James at small forward, 6′ 10,” 253 Anthony Davis at power forward, and the 6′ 11,” 250 lbs Ben Simmons playing small ball center.
Unlike other former Lakers traditional low post centers like JaVale McGee, Dwight Howard, or Andre Drummond, opposing teams would not be able to play Ben Simmons off the floor due to his inability to defend the perimeter. Simmons has the potential to be the perfect prototye of a modern defensive small ball center, a player who can block shots and protect the rim and still switch, rotate, and guard smaller guards and wings outside the paint,
We’re seeing traditional, low post centers consistently getting played off the court when opposing teams go small because they lack the quickness and mobility to defend on the perimeter. It even just happened to Rudy Gobert. With three big, athletic, mobile, and versatile front court defenders capable of guarding all five positions on the court in James, Davis, and Simmons, the Lakers could redefine what defense will look like in tomorrow’s NBA.
The idea of converting Simmons from a point guard to a point center is not new but something the Sixers have considered in the past because his size and skillset are better suited for playing point center than point guard. Simmons’ 6′ 11,” 250 lbs body and 7′ 0″ wingspan combined with his speed, quickness, athleticism, mobility, and defensive instincts make him the ideal candidate to be a modern small ball center in the mold of Draymond Green.
More importantly, trading for Ben Simmons would give the Lakers the third superstar they desperately need to keep pace with the Brooklyn Nets’ Superstar Big Three of Kevin Durant, James Harden, and Kyrie Irving. That’s something the Lakers’ Rob Pelinka and Klutch Sports’ Rich Paul have probably already discussed in the aftermath of the Lakers’ disappointing first round exit. Three superstars is great insurance against injuries.
Don’t underestimate the influence Rich Paul could have on what happens to Ben Simmons. It’s no secret that Paul and Klutch Sports have worked closely with Rob Pelinka and the LA Lakers to build a championship caliber squad. Rich and Rob worked closely together to orchestrate Anthony Davis’ trade to the Lakers and you can expect them to be looking for a solution that would add another Klutch Sports client to the eight already on the Lakers’ roster.
The big question is whether the Lakers have enough trading chips to make an offer to compete against offers from other teams that could include star players like Gordon Hayward, Kyle Lowry, CJ McCollum, or Zach LaVine? The best offer the Lakers could make could be a package including small forward Kyle Kuzma, shooting guard Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and either point guard Dennnis Schroder or shooting guard Talen Horton-Tucker.
Needless to say, trading for Simmons would cost the Lakers bench depth and diversity and leave them with few trading chips left to upgrade their 3-point shooting but it would dramatically upgrade their top ranked defense. Doubling down on defense by going all-in on a small ball center would be the Lakers zigging when every other NBA team is zagging but it would also give LeBron James and Anthony Davis the third superstar to be their best.
The Lakers would still have to scramble to find more accurate and prolific 3-point shooters at both guard positions but trading for Simmons would give them the foundation to become the NBA’s dominant defensive juggernaut.
-
I always love an idea that’s out-of-the-box and the Lakers trading for Ben Simmons certainly is not something most LA fans would be in favor of, especially after Ben’s flaws were exposed in the Sixers’ second round loss to the Hawks. Now might be the perfect time for the Lakers to steal him while his price is low.
When you look at Ben Simmon’s skills size and skills, it’s obvious to me that he would be better suited to be a point center than a point guard. In fact, he could be the Lakers’ version of Draymond Green, an elite small ball center who can defend all five positions as well as make plays for hiomself and teammates.
While other teams are going small on offense with stretch fives, the Lakers would be going in the other direction and looking to go small on defense, much like the Warriors did with Draymond Green and their Death Lineup. A front court Superstar Big Three of LeBron, AD, and Ben could be the best defensive front court in the history of the league.
We’re talking about three near 7-footers who can each defend 1 through 5 at the rim or behind the 3-point line. That’s unheard of size, speed, quickness, athleticism, and mobiliity for a small ball lineup. While it’s a long shot to happen, it’s the kind of creative and innovative moves Rob Pelinka needs to make to rebuild the Lakers this summer.
-
If they’re crazy enough (Morey is) to trade him…it’d be a coup that CP3 was supposed to be.
-
-
I actually kind of love this idea except for that Ben might get pushed around by guys like Embiid, Ayton and their ilk. But that could an incredibly unique dimension to the Laker offense.
-
Thanks, Jamie. This is actually one of my favorite articles this season. I had written last year about Ben’s potential as a small ball center but am intrigued by the possibility that Philly will have to trade Simmons. I think his potential as small ball point center on offense and a mobile athletic rim protector who can guard all five positions on defense is elite.
As for Embiid or Ayton pushing Ben around, Ben is 6′ 11″ 250 lbs and will have 6′ 9″ 250 lbs LeBron James and 6′ 11″ 250 lbs Anthony Davis to help him in the post. Lakers could dominate inside on offense and defense. Would need to find two elite high volume 3-point shooters for the guards position to make it work but teams would struggle to score against a James, Davis, Simmons Big Three.
Do I wish he could shoot and stretch the floor? Sure, but his ability to switch and shut down players who play all five positions makes up for that. Inabiliity to defend on the perimeter is what allows teams to play other centers off the court. That won’t happen with Ben, who has replace Myles Turner as my primary center target for the Lakers.
Talk about doubling down on defense. James, Davis, and Simmons would give the Lakers three ‘bigs’ who are mobile, athletic, and impactful at both ends. All three could play the five. All three are great instinctive defenses. All three are BIG and strong. They would make the Lakers defense dramatically better and more versatile.
Rich Paul needs to push this idea to the Lakers. It’s the single best way to redeem Ben’s value. Playiong small ball five with LeBron and AD would resurrect his career in a major way. Lakers defense, playmaking, and versatility would be unmatched in the league.
-
Count me in. Someone will get thru to Ben and help unleash him into the dynamic playoff performer that he can be. Why not us?
-
Thanks, Lee. I have trading for Ben as the #1 priority for Lakers, even over trading for Turner or Lowry. He is the perfect modern defensive small ball center. He and LeBron and Anthony would dominate the front court against everybody.
-
-
No. They can’t. If they wouldn’t take James Harden for him, they won’t take the worthless garbage the Lakers have to offer.
-
Therein lies the issue on a lot of these trade ideas. Can Lakers convince some team that Luz, KCP, THT and/or a S&T for a Dennis is a positive move?
-
Only piece the Lakers have worth a crap is AD, and you can’t get equal value. But if you move him, be prepared to unload everything related to the klutch clown show, including Lebron and THT. I would as I think the championship window is closed. AD seems content with having the pressure off having won one. Maybe Minny would give up Towns, and definitely Russell. Lebron is on his decline and will probably be looking for an extension to boot at another max. Send him back to Cleveland since he likes to pretend he gives a crap about his home state. Better to get rid of these guys a year too early than too late.
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The Lakers need a new starting point guard, shooting guard, and center if they want to rebound and win their 18th championship next season. Which position or positions will they prioritize and which stars will they pursue?
With no cap space for free agents and limited trading chips in the form of valued players under contract and tradeable draft picks, the Lakers face a daunting challenge upgrading the team’s starting lineup this offseason. Unless they’re willing to trade valuable young role players like Caruso and Horton-Tucker or accept being hard capped as the result of bringing in a player via a sign-and-trade, the Lakers options are severely handicapped.
So let’s look at the players the Lakers might target as new starting point guard, shooting guard, and center to get an idea of what kind of starting lineup the front office might be able to put together for next season:
FINDING A STARTING POINT GUARD
The Lakers need a starting point guard who takes and makes more threes, does a better job running the offense, and has a proven record of creating more and better assists with fewer turnovers than Dennis Schroder.
Upgrading the point guard position will be difficult since Schroder is an unrestricted free agent and the Lakers don’t have cap space to replace him if he leaves as a free agent this summer unless he agrees to a sign-and-trade. Ideally, trading him to a team that needs a point guard like the Knicks with cap space to create a trade exception or sign-and-trading him to a team like the Raptors without cap space might be the Lakers’ best two options.
Point guard is one position where there may be legitimate star players who might be attainable if the Lakers decided to go all-in to get a star point guard. In order of priority of fit, here are the Lakers point guard candidates:
- Kyle Lowry. The Lakers best option might be to revisit a possible double sign-and-trade deal with the Raptors for Schroder for Lowry. The Lakers would have to include a sweetener but Lowry would be their third star.
- Chris Paul. A double sign-and-trade of Schroder for CP3 is another option should Paul opt out of his contract with the Suns as expected and decides to join up his friend LeBron James to create a Lakers Big Three.
- Lonzo Ball. Like with Lowry and CP3, reuniting with Lonzo would require the Lakers to accept a hard cap for adding a player via a sign-and-trade but in compensation would not cost as much to pull off.
- Derrick Rose. Using the Taxpayer $6 million MLE or Non-Taxpayer $9 million MLE to sign Rose would enable the Lakers to save their trading chips to upgrade their starting shooting guard and center positions.
FINDING A STARTING SHOOTING GUARD
The Lakers need a starting shooting guard who is a proven high volume, high percentage 3-point shooter who can play defense and has the gravity to open up the floor for LeBron James and Anthony Davis to attack the rim.
Upgrading starting shooting guard should be the Lakers’ top priority as it’s the position with the most available high volume, high percentage 3-point shooters, including several players who would be legitimate third stars. Landing one of these elite 3-point shooters will likely require the Lakers to go all-in with package that could include quality role players like Kyle Caruso, Alex Caruso, Talen-Horton Tucker, and their first round pick.
The Lakers need to an elite high volume, high percentage 3-point shooter who can play creditable defense to replace low volume 3-point shooter KCP. In order of priority of fit, here are the Lakers shooting guard candidates:
- CJ McCollum. Landing a star shooting guard like CJ would require the Lakers to go all-in with a package of Kyle Kuzma, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Talen Horton-Tucker, and their 2021 first round draft pick.
- Buddy Hield. Trading for Hield might be the Lakers best option as they already have had talks with the Kings about Hield and Sacramento has always coveted Kyle Kuzma. Hield would be a great fit on Lakers.
- Terry Rozier. The Hornets are deep at guard and short in the front court so might be interested in trading Rozier for a sign-and-trade for Harrell. Rozier is an elite volume 3-point shooter and quality playmaker.
- Malik Beasley. Since Beasley makes considerably less than any of the other high volume, high percentage 3-point shooters, the Lakers might be able to acquire him in return for Kyle Kuzma and Alex Caruso.
FINDING A STARTING CENTER
While the center position has become undervalued in today’s NBA, the Lakers desperately need to stop settling for temporary rent-a-center solutions and solidy the center position with a modern stretch center.
Over the last two seasons, the Lakers have failed to find a modern center who can shoot the three and finish lobs at the rim on offense and protect the rim and switch and rotate and defend on the perimeter on defense. McGee, Howard, Harrell, Gasol, and Drummond all had flaws that led to them being unplayable in the playoffs. Fortunately, the Lakers have the perfect prototype modern offensive and defensive center in Anthony Davis.
Wirh Anthony Davis fagility and desire not to play the five, the Lakers need a dependable starting center who can fill the team’s greatest two needs at the five: stretching the floor o offense and protecting the rim on defense.
- Myles Turner. The NBA’s leading shot blocker the past two seasons, Turner would be the perfect front court mate to pair with Anthony Davis in a Twin Towers lineup that would anchor a championship defense.
- Chris Boucher. The 6′ 9″ Boucher is another player who could be a great small ball center for the Lakers. His unique combination of length and athletic hops would be a great complement to Anthony Davis.
- Kristaps Porzingis. Word is the Mavs will be looking to move Porzingis as part of their franchise makeover since he and Doncic do not like each other. Playing next to Davis, Porzingis could be perfect for the Lakers.
- Nerlens Noel. While he can’t stretch the floor, Noel has speed, quickness, and mobility to be the perfect modern defensive center. Unlike Rudy Gobert, Nerlens cannot be playoff the floor defensively.
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER
Since they don’t have enough resources to land each of their top choices for starting point guard, shooting guard, and center, the Lakers will have to figure out what they need and how much to budget for each position.
If they use all their trading chips to land Lowry at point guard or McCollum at shooting guard, the Lakers may have to settle for signing a less expensive free agent with their MLE like Noel at center or like Rose at point guard. There are unlimited combinations of three new starters at point guard, shooting guard, and center that would be major upgrades for the Lakers and would unleash LeBron James and Anthony Davis to be even better.
For example, one combination that would be lethal for the Lakers would be Derrick Rose starting at point guard, Buddy Hield at shooting guard, and Myles Turner at center to complement LeBron James and Anthony Davis. Another great combination that could give the Lakers a third superstar to go with LeBron James and Anthony Davis would be Kyle Lowry starting at point guard, Buddy Hield at shooting guard, and Nerlens Noel at center.
In the end, this summer may be the most important offseason in LeBron James tenure with the Lakers. What Rob Pelinka and the Lakers front office do to upgrade the starting lineup will determine the future of the franchise.
-
We’re going to have a Lakers Fast Break podcast Sunday night to be posted Monday morning discussing all of the Lakers options to upgrade their current roster with trades and free agent signings this summer.
I wrote this article as part of my preparation for that podcast and as a guideline for Lakers fans to consider what I believe are the team’s top options to replace Dennis Schroder, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, and Andre Drummond as starters.
I’m a strong believer that the Lakers’ offseason plan needs to focus on landing a third star. My top picks for starting point guard are Kyle Lowry, starting shooting guard CJ McCollum, and starting center Myles Turner. Landing one of these three could take almost all of the Lakers trading chips, including young stars like Caruso and THT and their draft pick.
Since the Lakers don’t have enough trade assets or exceptions to land their top option at all three positions, Pelinka is going to have to be creative and decide which position should be the top priority and how resources should be allocated among the positions.
Are there scenarios where Schroder, KCP, or Drummond end up starting for the Lakers? If so, hopefully they would be part of packages where the Lakers landed a third superstar in the form of Lowry or McCollum or the player I still think should be their top priority: Myles Turner.
At any rate, hope you enjoy the article. I list my four top choices for the Lakers to pursue at point guard, shooting guard, and center. I also include all of the latest stats for each of the 12 players on my list. Let me know what you think of the article, my picks, and who else you would add to the list of potential starters for next season’s Lakers.
-
So, if the rumors are true, the Lakers may be looking to revive the Dennis Schroder and KCP for Lowry trade the Lakers and Raptors came close to making at the trade deadline when the Lakers woundn’t include THT.
The big question is what would the trade look like this time around? Raptors would have to agree with Dennis on a contract (4 years. $84 million) and Lakers with Lowry (2 years, $50 million). If the Lakers could make trade Schroder & KCP for Lowry, do it. It would be an important first domino to make the offseason a winner almost no matter what else.
The beauty of the deal is it doesn’t cost the Lakers Kyle Kuzma, their best trading chip, who could be used in a deal with Sacramento for Buddy Hield, another situation where there is history of interest on both sides. Buddy would modernize the Lakers offense greatly and open up lanes fr LeBron and AD to attack but also open shooters for them to dish to.
The Lakers problem this summer is they have no riller or ballast. So they can’t trade Kuzma ($13M) straight up for Buddy ($22M). Maybe add McKinnie and Gasol. Maybe expand the trade to include THT in a S&T and get back Maurice Harkness and Damian Jones. Anyway, there’s a way. That only leaves the starting center situation.
-
Good article Tom. I would love to Lonzo back home. I’m not crazy about bringing in a 35 year old Lowry that missed 26 games this year. McCollum would fit in great offensively just know that he isn’t the defender that KCP is and we’d suffer on that end. I also would like the fit with Buddy Hield. He struggled to make shots all year but with LBJ and AD he’d get a more easier shots with the Lakers. I agree Turner would be great fit but I don’t think the Pacers will trade him to the Lakers.
-
Dennis not agreeing unless he gets a major overpay which TO won’t want, so don’t waste your breath.
-
I am not on the Lowry or Kemba train. We have injury concerns enough as it is. In terms of the SG spot I think we have to also consider what’s full off-season of rest will do for KCP who, apart from his lack of a consistent shot or aggressive offensive posture last season, is a perfect fit fir this team. As far as center goes I am also not on board the “we 100%, absolutely have to, we’ve failed LeBron if we don’t get a stretch give this summer” train. Ayton doesn’t shoot threes, just does big man stuff well. If we can swing a reasonable trade for Turner or Vucevic, great, those are the only two I’d really consider, maybe bringing back an aged-Brook Lopez if possible but other than that we need a banger for the regular season more than a tall guy who can shoot threes. Honestly I’ll be fine if we simply keep Gasoline and Drummond if it’s for the vet min in Dre’s case. Prove you want to be here, give us the ability to build steam around you and we can give you a raise next season. PG is where we need to focus. Using Schroder in a S&T for either Russ, Dame or…Simmons… makes TONS of sense for the Lakers as those guys are already signed and we wouldn’t be hard-capped in the doing. If that takes including KCP or Kuzma I think I’d be cool with that since those minutes can be slotted right into THT’s growth chart. Also, don’t sleep on us keeping cost-controlled McKinnie who showed some promise as a role guy with his rebounding and decent enough shooting. Honestly I’d be thrilled if the Lakers were in play to acquire Payne or Reggie. Calling Rondo on the buyout market next season now, lol.
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
While a healthy LeBron James and Anthony Davis are clearly two of the top five players in the NBA, the Los Angeles Lakers need to upgrade their other three starters to be able to compete for the championship next season.
The harsh reality is Dennis Schroder, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, and Andre Drummond would not be guaranteed to start on any of the other top teams with whom the Lakers would be competing for a championship next year. That’s why the Lakers’ top priority this summer should be to upgrade their starting point guard, shooting guard, and center positions with true starter quality players who can complement LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
The Lakers need a starting point guard who can run the offense and shoot the three, a starting shooting guard who’s an elite high volume 3-point shooter, and a starting center who can stretch defenses and protect the rim. The problem is the Lakers have no cap space to sign free agents, only two players with tradeable contracts, and just their 2021 and 2027 first round picks to upgrade their starting lineup to championship caliber this summer.
While the Lakers don’t have the trading chips to land a third superstar like Bradley Beal or Zach Lavine, here are three second tier NBA stars who would transform LA’s starting lineup into a championship caliber fivesome.
1. Replace Dennis Schroder with Derrick Rose
While Dennis Schroder has talent, he’s not a good enough playmaker or 3-point shooter to be the starting point guard on a championship team. He’s actually better suited to be a backup point guard coming off the bench.
Unfortunately, Dennis has made it clear at this point in his career that he wants the role and salary of a starting point guard rather than coming off the bench like he did when he was 6MOY runner up for the OKC Thunder. Schroder will be an unrestricted free agent this summer. Since the Lakers don’t have the cap space to replace him, they will have to overpay or sign-and-trade him to avoid losing him for nothing in free agency this summer.
The perfect candidate to replace Schroder as the Lakers’ starting point guard would be the Knicks’ Derrick Rose, an unrestricted free agent whom LA should try to sign with their $10 million non-taxpayer Mid Level Exception. The 32-year old Rose is coming off a stellar season with New York where he averaged 14.7 points, 2.6 rebounds, 4.2 assists in 26.8 minutes per game shooting 48.7% from the field, 41.1% from three, and 88.3% from the line.
Rose would better complement LeBron and AD and give the Lakers a proven starting quality point guard who was a better 3-point shooter (41.4% vs. 33.5%) and playmaker (3.0 vs. 2.0 assists-to-turnover) than Schroder.
2. Replace Kentavious Caldwell-Pope with Buddy Hield
While he’s a plus defender, shooting guard Kentavious Caldwell-Pope has averaged just 9.3 and 9.7 points per game the last two seasons, which is not what the starting shooting guard on a championship team should average.
The Lakers’ single biggest problem offensively is the lack of high volume, high percentage 3-point shooting. While KCP shot 38.5% and 41.0% from three over the last two seasons, he still only averaged 1.6 threes per game. What the Lakers desperately need is a shooting guard who can not only get open but also won’t hesitate to rain 8 to 10 threes per game. In other words, a top-15 volume 3-point shooter like Steph Curry or Damian Lillard.
The perfect candidate to replace Kentavious Caldwell-Pope is Sacramento shooting guard Buddy Hield, who was the third most prolific 3-point shooter in the league after Curry and Lillard with 10.2 threes per game. Averaging 4.0 made threes per game and shooting 39.1% from deep, Hield would give the Lakers the high volume, high percentage 3-point shooter they need to free up LeBron James and Anthony Davis to attack the paint.
The Kings have been looking to move Buddy Hield, who has three year’s left on his contract at $22.8, $20.8, and $18.9 million per year, for some time now. They need cap space to invest in several promising young players. Offering a package of Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Talen Horton-Tucker should be enough for Sacramento. KCP is a proven quality two-way rotation player and THT is a future superstar whom the Kings can build around.
Replacing KCP with Hield would solve many of the Lakers 3-point shooting woes and catapult them from the bottom five in attempted 3-point shots and 3-point percentage to the top-ten in the league in both categories.
3. Replace Andre Drummond with Myles Turner
While the Lakers hoped the Andre Drummond experiment would somehow work out with him re-signing this summer for the NT MLE, it’s obvious the Big Penguin was not a good fit alongside LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
Andre Drummond not only didn’t solve the Lakers’ rim protection problems on defense but also didn’t provide the spacing LA desperately needed to prevent opposing teams from packing the paint against LeBron and AD. While they still contend Drummond did not have enough time to learn how to play with James and Davis, Andre simply does not have the low post offensive game or natural rim protection instincts the Lakers need.
The player the Lakers need to be their starting center is the Pacers’ Myles Turner, who led the entire NBA with 3.4 blocked shots per game. Turner is the perfect front court candidate to play center alongside Anthony Davis. Myles not only solves the Lakers’ rim protection problems but also gives them a stretch five center whose career 35% 3-point shooting can space the floor and open up lanes for LeBron James and Anthony Davis to attack.
The Indiana Pacers are looking to trade Turner because the double bigs, twin towers lineups featuring him and Sabonis have not worked. Turner currently makes $18 million per year and has two years remaining on his contract. Turner will be in high demand and the price high because of his age and skillset but Kyle Kuzma and the Lakers’ 2021 and 2027 first round draft picks for Myles should be enough to tempt Indiana to trade him to LA.
The 25-year old, 6′ 11,” 250 lb Turner would provide the Lakers with the perfect modern center who can protect the rim and stretch the floor and allow the injury prone Anthony Davis to play the four all of the time.
Replacing Dennis Schroder, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, and Andre Drummond with Derrick Rose, Buddy Hield, and Myles Turner would dramatically upgrade the Lakers’ starting lineup for next season.
The changes would improve the Lakers at both ends of the court. Davis and Turner would put a lid on the basket defensively and five capable 3-point shooters would open up the floor for the Lakers to get to the rim on offense. The Lakers would lose some depth off the bench but Pelinka should be able to re-sign stalwart reserves like Alex Caruso and Markieff Morris and maybe pick up some other quality veterans for the bench like TJ McConnell.
There are other candidates the Lakers could pursue to upgrade their starting lineup. For example, starting point guard targets could include players like Malcolm Brogdon, Kyle Lowry, or even Russell Westbrook or Chris Paul. Starting shooting guard targets could include CJ McCollum, Terry Rozier, Evan Fournier, Malik Beasley, or Devonte Graham. Starting center targets could include Kristaps Porzingis, Chris Boucher, or Christian Wood.
A starting lineup of Derrick Rose, Buddy Hield, LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and Myles Turner would give the Los Angeles Lakers the offensive fire power and defensive rim protection to win their 18th championship.
-
Rob Pelinka faces his biggest challenge yet as head of basketball operations for Lakers rebuilding this roster. Saying he wants to run it back (whatever that means) is not a promising first comment, especially if it includes using the NT MLE to re-sign Andre Drummond to be the Lakers center. Andre is not a stretch center or rim protector or low post scorer and it puzzles me why the Lakers continue to think he is the future at center.
Replacing Schroder, KCP, and Drummond with Rose, Hield, and Turner would be a perfect summer for the Lakers. Signing Derrick Rose with the NT MLE, trading KCP and THT for Buddy Hield, and trading Kuzma and our 2021 and 2027 first round picks for Myles Turner would transform the Lakers starting lineup into a true championship starting lineup.
There are, of course, other viable candidates to replace Schroder, KCP, and Drummond but Rose, Hield, and Turner are the three new starters I think make the most sense to modernize the Lakers on offense and make them dominant on defense. This summer is one of those momentous offseasons that will determine what kind of future the LeBron James led Lakers will have. Making the right moves would be a godsent. Making the wrong moves, like keeping Drummond, would portend a disaster.
-
I can’t agree more, Tom. Seems as if you read my mind. I will go with the three players you mentioned( Rose, Hield, Turner ) in a heartbeat. That would totally give the starting five an unmatched balance and power. Not sure how practical it is to get that done, but that would be a hell of a move.
-
Thanks, Buba. I think Lakers need to shore up starting lineup. Being able to get all three is going to be tough. What could be a difference maker is the ability to sign-and-trade Schroder and Harrell. There’s also no hard cap if you SEND out a player via sign-and-trade. Only if you receive one.
The bigger issue is whether the Lakers will embrace improving their 3-point shooting. All three of these guys can shoot the three, especially Hield whose top five.
I would say top priority to me is Myles Turner. I would trade whatever the Pacers want of Kuz, KCP, THT, Schroder, and Harrell. I think he’s that important. Will protect and help Davis become the best he can. Next has to be a point guard to replace Dennis.
I would be thrilled with Turner and Rose. Hield would be frosting on the cake. Give me 2 out of 3 please.
-
Thanks for the response, Tom. I can’t wait to see what Rob does this offseason. Whatever he does has to include improving our three-point shooting, first and foremost. And that includes our center position as well. You’ve been making good points on this subject for a while. I like mongo’s counter as well though he likes to err on the side of caution.
-
-
-
-
What the above three transactions amount to is:
Additions: Derrick Rose, Buddy Hield, and Myles Turner.
Subtractions to trade for Hield and Turner:
KCP, THT (S&T), Kuzma, 2021 and 2027 1st RoundersS&T or lost to free agency candidates:
Schroder, HarrellRe-sign: Caruso, Morris, Matthews
-
3-Point shooting dramatically improved:
50.0% more 3P takes, 43.3% more 3P makes
Points from threes increased by 6.6 PPG.Lakers offense was 22nd with 109.5 PPG
Would now be 116.1 PPG, which tied for 5th in league.Players Subtracted:
KCP 9.7/2.7/1.9, made 1.8 of 4.4 3PPG for 41.0%
THT 9.0/2.6/2.8, made 0.6 of 2.0 3PPG for 28.2%
Kuzma 12.9/6.1/1.9, made 2.0 of 5.6 3PPG for 36.1%TOTAL 31.6/11.4/6.6, MADE 4.4 OF 12.0 FOR 36.7%
Players Added:
Rose 14.7/2.6/4.2, made 1.1 of 2.6 3PPG for 41.1%
Hield 16.6/4.7/3.6, made 4.0 of 10.2 3PPG for 39.1%
Turner 12.6/6.5/1.0, made 1.5 of 4.4 3PPG for 35.2%TOTAL 43.9/13.8/8.8, made 6.6 of 17.2 3PPG for 38.3%
-
If it was only that simple to just unplug and plug in those numbers…
-
The thing about 3-point shooting is you have to have guys who are able and willing to take a lot of shots. You can’t improve your 3-point shooting volume and percentage by just having the same guys take more shots. It’s about the players’ games and you need players who are confident shooters who work to get open threes and then can make them.
Of the three additions, Rose is questionable as this was his best season from deep. Hield and Turner have been consistent throughout their career. The big difference to me is the PPG of the new additions vs. the current players. Lakers need starters who can get the job done. Schroder, KCP, and Drummond are not the answer.
Can the Lakers sign Rose and make the trades for Hield and Turner? That’s really the big question. So far, I haven’t seen any indication that Pelinka believes the current roster can’t get it done, despite the obvious evidence. Like Vogel, he continues to claim the ‘shots will fall.’
Unless Pelinka and Vogel admit the Lakers need a starting center who is a stretch five and a shooting guard who’s a high volume and high percentage 3-point shooter, any hopes of the Lakers coming out of summer as a favorite to win a championship are probably fairy tales.
Lakers not going to win unless they embrace the power of 3-point shooters when you have LeBron James and Anthony Davis. That is how you win in today’s game. We need the front office to understand that and build a new roster that embraces the modern game.
Do I expect that to happen? Probably not. We’ll probably try to retain Drummond as our starting center and go down hill from there.
-
But the stats are just part of the equation. You gotta factor in coaching, system, roster construction, and maybe most importantly…fit. It’s not easy to join a team with LeBron & AD and adjust to the new role you’ll need to play. That’s why Pau, Lamar, Fish, & MWP did well with Kobe..know your role & stay ready. That’s a unique skillet. Also..I’m not sure Buddy & D-Rose help our perimeter defense. Like folks say..it’s all a crapshoot. You can’t predict how guys will respond when put into this situation.
-
-
-
And speaking of coaching..I’m not sure Frank is the guy to effectively integrate all these new dudes and put them in comfortable positions to succeed. We’ve seen his failure at that this season. And his reluctance to make changes is problematic. I’m watching all the moves Ty Lue has made in these 2 series so far and realizing how stuck in the mud our coach is.
-
Good points, Mongo. I suppose part of the blame has to go to Pelinka for promising a starting job to Drummond. Hard for Frank to make the change until too late and too little because of the injuries. The problem is a static starting lineup is great for stability and setting roles but not when the three non-superstar starters are subpar. Frank should have starting whomever matched up best since there wasn’t much impact difference between the #3 and #8 players on this team. Vogel would have been better off rotating starting roles by matchup. Lue has done a good job adjusting but then it’s easier to do when you go down 0-2 in both series.
-
-
Nice article, LT, hope your foray down south was lucrative, as well. I am willing to embrace the idea of upgrading the roster but there are a few things I think we absolutely have to avoid:
I think that, in order to fill it out, we need to make sure we do not bring a player back in a Sign & Trade. Even if it means starting the season with a roster that has some holes it makes it so difficult to both retain our own free agents and make moves at the trade deadline. There is a very short list of players I would amend that stance for: Dame, Steph, & Kawhi. Nobody else I can think of fits the needs of our team, brings either the defense, scoring or the playmaking we need (or both in Curry’s case).
Ignoring that the Lakers actually made moves we advocated for at the start of the season, they just didn’t pan out as expected. When we brought in Matthews, kept KCP, and added McLemore we tried to address the three point shooting issue. Also, Davis was atrocious from behind the arc all season long and LeBron missed the most games ever in his career. No single player can overcome all of that, we’ll see that unfold in Brooklyn with Kyrie and Harden out.
Indy listed Turner as part of it’s future core. I just don’t see us putting together a package that would make them change that notion. Whether he really is or not isn’t the issue, that’s how they’re posturing right now. Kuz, KCP and whatever ain’t going to get it done. Frankly, that’s true for a lot of the league and the kind of players we need. Everyone wants a better point guard, everyone wants stellar three and D guys on the roster, everyone wants a center that can play high level D and shoot the three. We may need to think outside those boxes like we did the Bubble season. I’m not saying “avoid trying to trade for Myles Turner” but rather let’s not focus on one player, under contract, who we don’t really have the assets to pry away, anyhow.
I like Rose, would be fine with him coming over. Like Schroder I don’t want to overpay for what is essentially a backup PG. That’s what was great about Avery Bradley and Rondo at this point in his career. They have a nose for defense, don’t need the ball to be effective and have improved in the analytic areas of the game. Rose also doesn’t really fit into your “volume, volume, volume from three” theory as he only took 2/game last season. He’s also another guy who generally has one major injury/season and misses chunks of time. Since he tore his knee up he’s played in 60+ games twice, only played in 50 last season.
In terms of structuring our cap and setting ourselves up for success next season I look at it this way: Of our free agents who is essential to our identity and needs? One could make the point that none of our free agents are “essential” but that since they are ours, and we can go over the cap to retain them, that therein lies their true value. We can keep everyone currently on the roster, give them raises or whatever. The only one I’m ambivalent about is Schroder. Sign him for too much and he’s an albatross. I’ve said it before, no more than $12-15 mil, if he finds a bigger deal somewhere else cool.
I also think we need to take a long look at why guys didn’t play in the playoffs. Trezz got some “hey thanks for being here” minutes, same for THT. Why? That will be one of the biggest questions I would have for Rob and Frank. If the kid is worth keeping he should be worth playing, if only for the experience since, you know, he’s worth keeping. Might also be worth our time to simply let the market dictate the worth of guys like THT, Caruso, etc. The summer is so dicey, things can start fast and you feel like you’re getting left out.
The thing with the Lakers is we got AD and LBJ, so we need complimentary pieces. I don’t see us currently being in a position to acquire another top tier player (as you noted) so I think we need to nail down who can help them. I’m of the same thinking you are when it comes to Drummond. Unless he’s here on a vet minimum deal he’s not our guy. LeBron needs a more mobile and athletic big like Tristian Thompson, Dwight, that kinda guy. AD wants to play the 4 in the regular season so we need some kind of 5. It’s funny how much hinges on what Gasol and Trezz do this summer.
All in all, be interesting to see whom we draft. It’s all happening!
-
Thanks for reading and commenting, Jamie.
I’m completely in agreement with you that we should avoid being hard capped, which primarily means not ‘receiving’ a player via S&T. I would also make exceptions to get a third star but in general, the hard cap makes it impossible to overpay your own players to keep them and limits actions on trades. It’s why I focused on adding players like Turner and Hield who are under contract.
Yeah, I was pretty supportive of the moves we made last offseason but in retrospect I think we were all in a euphoric state after winning the championship. When you look back, it’s hard to deny that a big factor was LeBron and AD getting four and half months off to get 100% healthy and rested. AND both of them having the best postseason shooting the three they ever had as a result. Obviously, we saw a completely different challenge this season with the injuries. Bottom line, lots to disagree in retrospect with the moves Rob made but that’s life in the NBA.
I think Indiana will trade Turner regardless of their listing him as core. The simple truth is a twin towers starting lineup with Myles and Sabonis just doesn’t work and Turner is too expensive to come off the bench and Sabonis is their future. I also agree there are likely to be teams who can offer more. I do think we could win the Turner deal if we went all in and included Kuzma and THT and the 2021 pick and I would do it if necessary as I think solidifying the center position is our top priority. Not only to solve the stretch five and rim protection issues but also to protect Davis’ health going forward. I do think we have pieces to get one great player and Turner would be my choice, even over a volume shooter like Hield. Bottom line, I’d be thrilled with Rose for NT MLE and Turner for Kuz, THT, and the 2021 first.Rose is a short-term fill and would hopefully come for the NT MLE. There are other options like Lonzo, Lowry, Westbrook, CP3, etc. but would require taking a S&T guy which would hard cap us, which we both agree would not be good.
We may have to approach our rebuild as a two-step process, where we re-sign our own free agents in summer so we can trade them at the deadline. Or we can try to trade Schroder and Harrell via S&T deals for players under contract. I love the idea of maybe getting a shooter from Charlotte for a Harrell S&T or maybe a deal with the Raptors in a Schroder S&T. There aren’t as many teams with cap space as originally anticipated so there’s a good chance there will be teams who would like to add Schroder or Harrell but with S&T rather than cap space.
Drummond is the time bomb waiting to go off and screw the Lakers offseason. It still boggles me why the front office ever thought he could be the long term center for the Lakers. He can’t protect the rim or stretch the floor. And the only way we can sign a free agent is with the NT MLE. Wasting it on him rather than on a player like Rose would be a travesty. My biggest worry is Pelinka doubling down on Andre Drummond. When you look at the available centers who can stretch the floor and protect the rim, it’s hard not to see what a great fit Myles Turner would be on the Lakers. Again, I’d give Indiana whatever they want. A starting lineup with a Turner, Davis, James front court would be championship caliber and Davis is the perfect power forward to play with Turner. They would put a lid on the basket and Davis could go small when needed.
-
Yup, lots could have broken differently but between the moves made not panning out as hoped, the team’s overall shooting/scoring taking a dip and the massive amount of games lost due to injury/H&SP the hill was too high to conquer.
I’ll be surprised if Indy moves Turner before the trade deadline, likely not in the summer when they would hope that a new coach/system and another year together improves the on-court product. If having Turner at the 5 can work with AD they’ll see what Sabonis and Turner can do as that is, essentially, the same situation we are talking about creating here. Indy has Myles on a reasonable deal, he’s an elite defender signed until the season after next. Small market teams generally don’t trade impact for spare parts. They can (and should) get more than we can offer until well into the season if they move him this summer.
I think Rose will command a salary equivalent to Schroder. I would be surprised if he took such a small amount to come to a team where his role and influence are reduced. Frankly, he’s earned it and I’ll be surprised if New York (with ample cap space) doesn’t go a little over the line to keep him. He became the starting point guard, was in control of the offense and playing like D-Rose of old. If Julius had played anything like he did during the regular season they would be the darling dark horse show of the NBA playoffs and not Atlanta. That’s a lot to come here and hope LeBron and AD stay healthy and have enough in the tank come playoff time.
Thtat’s my big worry, in all honesty, these guys all know what LeBron has been able to accomplish and, like the rest of us, are wondering “is this the season he declines in a noticeable way?” That may hinder second tier stars looking to rebuild or up their rep. While nothing can compare to winning it all as a Laker, as we saw last season, the knives come out reeeeeeeal quick when we struggle or fail to meet expectations. Not saying it wouldn’t happen, just that I hope LeBron has his parabolic chamber sched in order, get that body reset.
I know one thing, the playoffs have been (for the most part) fun but the summer is where it’s going to get wild. With not as much cap space as expected the fish will feast early and it’ll come down to who can swing a major summer deal. The Lakers are also behind the 8 ball there as league rules won’t allow them to trade guys with newly minted deals until 3 months after the ink dries or 12/15. So it really just becomes a game of “What can we realistically expect to get for Kuz, KCP and…Alonzo McKinnie? Trezz if he opts in? Gasol if he doesn’t retire/go to Spain?” THT, Caruso, Matthews, McLemore, Schroder are all either going to sign a new deal with us or book it on out of town. When they do we won’t be able to move them for several months unless we S&T one. Same goes for this summer’s draft pick. Can’t be traded until 30 days after the draft and it’s going to be near the bottom of the 1st round. Not exactly a spot known to bew coveted because, as a first rounder, they’ll have a specific range of money coming their way.
Rob has his work cut out for him, that much is true. Going to be wacky and wild.
-
-
-
- Load More Posts
TOM WONG
Founder and Publisher
“Welcome to the new Lakerholics website. We wanted to create a place that would become the favorite online home for informed and passionate Lakers fans.
Please click ‘CONTACT US’ and let us know how we did, ‘JOIN US’ to become a member, or ‘SUBSCRIBE’ to receive our newsletter.
We promise to open your eyes, ears, and mind to brand-new purple and gold world.”
-LakerTom
FEATURED POST
5 Things: Frizzle Fried
The Lakers are a team forever on, at a minimum, low heat. Even the dudes who wipe the sweat off the court are under a microscope when you’re a part of the Lakers organization. So the heat will only get hotter for this team as they come home after a fairly disastrous road trip. All […]
FEATURED PODCAST
NBA Observations- Big Money Spent For The Clippers And Heat, Are The Lakers Next?
The guys from the Lakers Fast Break return for some NBA Observation as they share thoughts on the recent big-money extensions for Miami coach Erik Spoelstra and the Clipper’s Kawhi Leonard. Does this mean the Lakers will be opening up their wallet a little more as well? Plus after Toronto Raptors coach Darko Rajakovic’s huge rant after the Lakers game because of the fourth-quarter free throw disparity, we ponder if Darvin Ham will ever show that kind of energy if he remains as the guys on the sidelines for LA. We’re back talking some big $$$, and wondering if the Lakers are ready to go on a spending spree? Find out our thoughts on the latest Lakers Fast Break podcast!
Don’t forget to watch the Lakers games with us LIVE at playback.tv/lakersfastbreak and our newest Lakers Fast Break merchandise site is now up at https://tinyurl.com/39yb4ta3, check it out!
Please Like, Share, and Subscribe to our channel and our social media @lakersfastbreak on Twitter.
If you have questions, give us a shout-out on Twitter, YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook, or send us your thoughts to lakersfastbreak@yahoo.com or become a supporter of the Lakers Fast Break today at https://anchor.fm/lakers-fast-break
The views and opinions expressed on the Lakers Fast Break are those of the panelists or guests themselves and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Lakers Fast Break or its owners. Any content or thoughts provided by our panelists or guests are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, anyone, or anything.
Presented by our friends at lakerholics.com, lakersball.com, Pop Culture Cosmos, Inside Sports Fantasy Football, Vampires and Vitae, SynBlades.com, YouTube’s John Mikaelian, the novel Congratulations, You Suck (available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble), The Happy Hoarder, EmpireJeffTV, Larry Lakers Dribbling Chat Chat, Lakers Corner, and Retro City Games!
FEATURED TWEET
Lakers stars used speed and space of transition as stage for talent
https://twitter.com/Lakers/status/1437491268544835595
LAKERHOLICS LINKS
Library of Links to Everything Lakers
LAKERHOLICS MEMBERS
A Los Angeles Lakers Community
ABOUT LAKERHOLICS
Dedicated to Kobe and Gigi Bryant
Recent Comments
WHO’S ONLINE
[who-is-online-now]
KYLE LOWRY TRADE
With Lowry, Schroder, and Horton-Tucker now free agents, there’s no way to resurrect the trade the Lakers and Raptors almost made at the trade deadline. Frankly, both teams probably regretted not making the trade in retrospect.
A straight double S&T of Schroder for Lowry, however, might be an excellent deal for both teams. Lowry and Schroder would obviously both have to agree to be sign-and-traded. The Raptors want to help Kyle go where he wants out of loyalty and would be happy to get a young point guard like Schroder to replace Lowry. The win-now Lakers would be happy to get a proven winner like Lowry. Both teams would be glad not to lose a star point guard for nothing.