WELCOME TO LAKERHOLICS
A Virtual Community for Lakers Fans
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
What the critics of the Westbrook trade miss when they focus on why Russ’ poor shooting isn’t a good fit for the Lakers is how his dominant presence at point guard has a domino effect that unleashes the team’s best lineup.
There’s never been any question the Lakers best lineup was with LeBron James at the four and Anthony Davis at the five but AD’s preference to play the four to avoid injuries and extend his career limited the lineup’s usage. During the championship season, Davis played center 40% in the regular season and 60% in the playoffs. This past season, the Lakers reduced his center minutes to 10% in the regular season and 20% in the playoffs.
It was like the Lakers forgot all about the lethal small ball lineup with LeBron at the four and AD at the five that destroyed playoff opponents last year in the bubble and allowed L.A. to take home their 17th NBA championship. But the sudden opportunity to trade for a future HOF point guard in Russell Westbrook may have finally forced the Lakers to do what fans have been calling for two years: play LeBron at the four and Anthony Davis at the five.
Ideally, the Lakers should start LeBron James at the four and Anthony Davis at the five. That’s the lineup Russ, LeBron, and Anthony discussed when they met two weeks before free agency to talk about possibly playing together. The early signs support Davis starting at the five or at least playing major minutes at the five since the Lakers only have two centers on the roster right now and there is no talk about them pursuing anybody as a third center.
There’s also the issue of the Lakers’ starting lineup needing volume 3-point shooters to prevent teams from clogging the paint to force LA to shoot from outside. Lack of 3-point shooting is a problem adding Russ has not helped. With three superstar starters who are not elite 3-point threats, the Lakers’ other two starters must be high volume, high percentage 3-point shooters and neither center — Marc Gasol or Dwight Howard — meet that criteria.
Being able to move LeBron James off the ball to the four, the logical position for him to play to as he finishes his career, and Anthony Davis to the five, his ideal position, was the biggest benefit of trading for Russell Westbrook. While AD has said he would play the five if needed and frankly proved it by playing center 60% of the time to win the bubble championship, he has obviously embraced Russ coming to the Lakers and him moving to the five.
What the Westbrook trade critics miss completely is that impact on the Lakers of Russ attacking the rim and throwing lobs to LeBron and AD or kickouts to the volume 3-point shooters Rob Pelinka added this offseason. The Lakers didn’t just add an elite point guard. They added a third superstar who allowed them to re-align their lineups and rotations, optimize their superstars, and prioritize playing their championship version of small ball.
The trade for Westbrook was made for a multitude of reasons, including being able to move LeBron and AD to the four and five. That’s why Anthony Davis at the five is the missing piece to the Lakers’ championship puzzle.
4 Comments-
LeBron will be LeBron and Russ will be Russ but whether the Lakers will be the best team in the NBA next season will depend on how Anthony Davis takes control of his great talent and plays as the small ball center for the Lakers. That will be the difference maker that will determine how great the Lakers will be. This season, until LeBron retires, and after the Lakers become AD’s team.
Becoming AD’s team is going to happen and it’s entirely possible it might happen this season. I know there was talk after the bubble championship that last season might have been when AD takes over but we know now that was doomed. Davis knows now he must take control of the destiny of the Lakers if they are to beat the Nets and win their 18th NBA championship.
-
This is kind of cherry-picking around the fact that AD looked limited from the get-go. The short turnaround did he and LeBron zero favors. Injuries played a massive part in both his role and impact and when LeBron went down with the high ankle injury that pretty much sealed our fate. We might not have known, certainly we all hoped that the players who could play would play better, but that did not happen.
Wherever he plays he needs to play at a near MVP level and certainly at DPOY level for us to attain the goals they desire, there’s no question about that. LeBron will be ready, will ease his way into full-bore LeBron mode over the course of the season and, barring injury, be ready for the playoffs.
Russell is someone I hope can be the more dominant force in the regular season, and in the doing spell LeBron for stretches and let him play a less involved game so as to be better prepared for the playoffs, and start to build a rapport with the rest of the team, specifically Anthony Davis. If Russ has a dominant regular season the Lakers will be in good shape. if he struggles to fit there could be some major issues when the playoffs roll around.
As you well know I don’t give a fig about volume three point shooting. What they need to focus is on are smarter and more decisive three point shots. I can all but guarantee the Lakers will shoot below the league average in terms of attempts based solely on the primary ball-handlers on the team. In reality the guys who will shoot threes will often not be creating their own three point attempt, it will be created for them off of drive and kicks or passes out of the mid post. What we need are guys who don’t over-think the next step off of those passes and just get the shot up off the pass. A lot of our offensive issues last season came after a smart effective pass devolved into some player or other faking a shot that didn’t need to be faked, starting to dribble or looking to make an extra-extra pass. It’s those kind of decisions we need to cut down on if not eliminate.
I honestly still don’t think we have the personnel to be an elite three point shooting team but we do have elite playmakers and scorers in the paint who can create a smart three point attempt. As long as we play a smarter brand of superstar-driven offense we’ll be fine. If we lead the league in smart three point attempts I’ll be pleased as punch. If we lead the league in attempts but are futile in our ability to can those shots we’ll look a lot like last season’s squad. If Anthony Davis can shoot like he did in the Bubble playoffs we could have a shot at doing both, though.
If AD and/or Russ are in the MVP talk it means a lot of things went right this season. It means Davis is shooting often and effectively, defending at a high level, and staying on the court. In Westbrook’s case it would mean that he’s playing smart basketball and focusing on what he does well and not trying to prove to planet Earth he can everything. We don’t need him to do everything, just be the best version of Russ he can be. Like you say, LeBron will be LeBron.
-
Thanks for reading and commenting, Jamie. It’s going to be a fascinating season for sure. There’s no doubt we need AD to be the player he can be for us to win it all this season. I think LeBron will be LeBron and Russ will be Russ but our championship hopes will ride with AD being the AD from the bubble.
I don’t disagree with your point that smart shot selection is going to be critical with this team. To me, that means Russ, LeBron, and AD all shooting fewer midrange and threes and scoring more points in the paint. Moving LeBron and AD to the four and five with Russ at the one opens the door for the Lakers to become a more lethal points in the paint team. Adding Russ and moving LeBron and AD into the paint is Lakers power move.
Can the Lakers still be an elite 3-point shooting team? That’s a challenge despite all the shooting we added because our core three have not proven they can shoot a high percentage. The only realistic path for the Lakers to become an elite 3-point shooting team is for the Big Three to limit their 3-point attempts and focus on points in the paint, leaving the rest of the team to be the 3-point shooters. With LeBron and AD moving to the four and five, this appears to be something the Lakers will try to accomplish.
Do the Lakers need to shoot a higher volume of threes than the last two seasons? Absolutely. Anybody who thinks differently is wrong. 3-point shooting has become even more important over the last season and the Lakers primary nemesis – the Brooklyn Nets – boast three superstars who are superior 3-point shooters than the Lakers three superstars. That means in some ways the Finals may be a defense vs. offense series. Lakers don’t need to outshoot the Nets but they do need to keep the 3-point differential within reason. Can’t be outshot by 10 threes per game or 30 points.
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
After flirting with the idea of ‘running it back’ with a healthier team, the Los Angeles Lakers changed course and opted instead to embark on an extreme makeover to change the role and reduce the workload for LeBron James.
In a bold shoot-for-the-moon move, the Lakers traded for enigmatic point guard Russell Westbrook to replace LeBron James as the team’s primary playmaker so James and Davis could move to power forward and center. The Lakers then proceeded to turnover their entire roster from last year, keeping only 21-year old Talen Horton-Tucker, whom they re-signed for 3-years and $32 million, and Marc Gasol, who still may be traded or waived.
So why such an extreme makeover for a team many thought would have repeated as champs had James and Davis not been injured? After all, Rob Pelinka had stated the Lakers hoped to keep the core of the team together. The answer it turns out is the core of the team consisted only of LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and Talen Horton-Tucker. Marc Gasol remained on the roster only because the Lakers’ efforts to trade him were unsuccessful.
The dramatic moves the Lakers have made so far confirm they’re committed to doing everything they can to reduce excessive wear-and-tear on LeBron James, extend his playing career, and optimize his championship window.
LAKERS’ MOVES ARE ALL ABOUT LEBRON?
It’s ironic the early focus was more on the future health and prospects of Anthony Davis than LeBron James but the decision to trade for Westbrook instead of Hield quickly showed the Lakers’ concern was LeBron’s health.
Generational players like LeBron are so important to winning that nothing brings back greater returns than optimizing what they can do. That’s what this offseason was all about for Rob Pelinka and the Los Angeles Lakers. Trading for an elite point guard like Russell Westbrook was not just an opportunity for the Lakers to add a third legitimate superstar but a chance to reduce LeBron’s workload to free him up to play off the ball in the post.
While it may seem crazy to think about taking the ball out of LeBron’s hands, that just might be the smartest thing for the Lakers to do, especially with an exceptional point guard like Russell Westbrook who excels at playmaking. Russ is what changes the dynamic and gives the Lakers the luxury of playing LeBron off the ball and closer to the rim. The move is part of a strategy to make life easier for LeBron and the Lakers’ offense more difficult to defend.
Moving James and Davis to the four and five allows the Lakers to play two elite 3-point shooters at the two and three to give Westbrook two of the best finishers in the league to pass to in LeBron and AD when he attacks the rim. Expect to see a steady diet of post ups going forward as that was one of the most potent parts of LeBron’s offensive arsenal. The goal this season is for LeBron and AD to score in the paint and let the shooters rain the threes.
After being injured in two of the last three seasons, it’s time to reduce the 36-year old James’ workload. Moving him to the four to unleash his ability to be more of a big time scorer rather than playmaker is a smart move.
WHY TURNOVER THE ENTIRE ROSTER?
The biggest surprise was the Lakers’ decision to turnover the entire roster, trading or allowing to leave in free agency multiple rotation players who were major contributors to the team winning the bubble championship.
The Lakers traded Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Montrezl Harrell, Kyle Kuzma, and their first round draft pick to the Wizards for Russell Westbrook and then allowed Alex Caruso and Dennis Scroder to leave in free agency. They also opted to not bring back Markieff Morris, Wesley Matthews, Andre Drummond, or Jared Dudley, although they still have three open roster spots so there’s still a chance one or more those slots could go to returnees.
While Russell Westbrook filled the Lakers’ need for an elite playmaker to free LeBron from being the facilitator, none of the players from last season’s roster took or made enough threes to solve the LA’s 3-point shooting woes. Fortunately, this free agency class was strong in high volume, high percentage 3-point shooters and the Lakers were able to add shooters like Wayne Ellington, Malik Monk, Kendrick Nunn, and Carmelo Anthony.
In the end, the Lakers decided they needed more playmaking and shooting to compete with the Brooklyn Nets than the roster that had won the bubble championship could provide them so they opted for an extreme makeover.
WHAT REMAINS FOR LAKERS TO DO?
The Lakers are essentially done building the roster they will roll out once the 2021–22 NBA season starts in October. All that remains is deciding whom to sign for the three remaining available minimum salary roster spots.
Major decisions remain as to who is going to start alongside LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and Russell Westbrook and whether the Lakers are going to go small with AD at the five or more traditional with Gasol playing center. The hope is the Lakers have finally embraced the small ball lineup with LeBron at the four and AD at the five that carried them to the championship in the bubble. Russ’ shooting woes almost demand the Lakers go small.
Other decisions involve how to use the new Superstar Big Three of James, Davis, and Westbrook. Obviously, you want to start and close with all three but maybe you want to stagger them to have two on the floor ast all times. Unless the Lakers sign a ackup point guard, we might see Vogel stagger LeBron and Russ to have an elite playmaker on the floor at all times. Then there’s always the issue of how to make sure there are enough shooters.
Bottom line, the Lakers have undergone an extreme makeover by trading for Westbrook, signing a host of quality high volume 3-point shooters, and moving LeBron James to the four and Anthony Davis to the five.
-
The more I’ve looked at what Rob accomplished this offseason, the more impressed I’ve been. The Lakers two goals were playmaking and shooting and Rob pretty much nailed both. Landing an elite point guard like Russ is going to dynamically change the Lakers and landing a half dozen volume high percentage 3-point shooters should finally solve LA’s shooting woes.
I’m still hoping for IT and Ennis with the 15th spot being left open for now. I might be willing to give that spot to Dudley with the understanding that if we had a shot at a star in the buyout market or via a trade that we might need the spot back. At any rate, the Lakers should have a cakewalk in the West with the ultimate target being the superteam matchup with the Brooklyn Nets in the battle of the Superstar Big Threes.
-
Tom, thanks for writing this magnificent piece. My concern going into next season is that while evidence points to us being better with AD at the five there is something in me that makes me worry about his durability at that position in an 82 game season. He has shown that he is fragile when it comes to his health and let’s not assume that he is going to be healthy through out the season. That would be a huge mistake.
When I read through articles here, it seems we are not having enough discussion about the options, the “what ifs”, and how much of a role Dwight Howard might play to limit AD from the rigors of playing center. Gasol’s situation is far from certain at this point.
We both agreed on the need for a bruising forward who can play both the 4 and 5 positions and space the floor, but as of now, we are yet to acquire one. I know Rob is not yet done with the roaster, but don’t you think we should worry about AD’s durability at the center position and what our best options are in this marathon of a season?
-
Thanks for reading and commenting, Buba. Always appreciated.
As I said in the opening to my article, I was actually surprised by the Westbrook trade despite the comments earlier by Marc Stein that the Lakers top priority was a playmaker so LeBron and AD could move to the 4 and 5. I never really expected the Lakers to go after Westbrook. I understood KCP, Kuzma, and Harrell were sure to go as trading chips but I never anticipated they would also opt to dump everybody from last year’s squad, including proven staples like Caruso, Matthews, and Morris.
To me, it seemed like the Lakers were more concerned about LeBron’s injuries two of the last three years than AD’s problems post-bubble. It was like the Lakers all of a sudden realized they may only have one or two more years of LeBron at this level of greatness so win additional championships. At least that’s what it appears to me happened. That may just be my interpretation as trading for Russ to play the one while moving LeBron and AD back to the 4 and 5 probably has as much advantage to AD as to LeBron.
At any rate, I do expect the Lakers to start AD at the five this season. I also expect him to play more than half his minutes at the five. I see AD playing 20 minutes at the 5 and Gasol and Howard splitting the remaining 28 minutes. The reason why is that LeBron and AD at the 4 and 5 simply works better with Russ at the 1. You need two volume 3-point shooters with Russ at the one and the only way you can get that is not to waste a spot on a reluctant shooter like Gasol or non-shooter like Dwight.
So what about AD playing 20 minutes per game at the five. I think the worry that playing the 5 would lead to more injuries is more of a unproven preference of Anthony Davis than anything statistically proven. I think the solution is just to watch the matchups. If we play the Nuggets or Sixer, maybe we have Dwight guard Jokic or Embiid. I do think the return of Dwight is one of the key moves that will allow Anthony to play the five. I would have loved to see the Lakers get a bruiser 4/5 like you suggested (PJ Tucker clone) but it doesn’t look like there is anybody out there right now who could fill that role.
I do think there’s immense pressure on THT to have a break out year, especially from beyond the arc. Otherwise, I could easily see he, Nunn, and Gasol as trading chips at the deadline to find a better option to help protect AD at the five.
At least so far, Marc Stein’s comments about the Lakers wanting a ‘difference-making playmaker’ so they could move LeBron to the 4 and AD to the 5 seems to have been spot on. Whether that ultimately translates into LeBron and AD starting at the 4 and 5 remains to be seen because of Vogel’s rotation history. But the Lakers moves so far have been in perfect lock step for the team to go small so I keep my hopes up that that’s what we’re going to do. Hopefully, I will be right.
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
That’s unfortunately what peoole think about Russell Westbrook. That the issue is more about the Lakers making him a winner than him making the Lakers a winner. This for one of the best point guards to ever play the game.
One thing for sure is Russ doesn’t give a damn about what people think. Like Chris Paul, he’s been written off as a mercurial superstar who’s style of play doesn’t work well within a team game and doesn’t translate into winning. Labeling Russ a loser is the ultimate disrespect, especially when you consider he averaged a triple-double four of the last five years and led his team to a successful winning record in nine of his eleven NBA seasons.
So what gives? Are the critics and pundits right that Russ is a poor fit for what the Lakers need? What does he have to change in his game for the Lakers to win a championship? Can the Lakers make Westbrook a winner?
WHY ARE CRITICS AND HATERS SO DOWN ON RUSS?
I wonder if the trade for Westbrook would have met with the same negative media and fan response had the Lakers had not been publicly on the verge of pulling off a trade for Buddy Hield, who was the perfect fit for the Lakers.
That the Lakers changed course at the last minute and traded for Russ instead of Hield has been the lead story as analysts evaluated the team’s roster moves and questioned whether Buddy would have been a better fit. There’s no question Hield’s high volume, high percentage 3-point shooting would have been a perfect fit on the Lakers but that doesn’t give critics the right to ignore Russ’ potential contributions as a legitimate third superstar.
Westbrook not only is a poor midrange and 3-point shooter but his presence on the court eliminates point guard as a position to create spacing for LeBron and AD, leaving the Lakers with only two positions for shooters. Rather than waste one of those positions on Gasol or Howard, the Lakers superstars proposed that LeBron move to the four and AD to the five so the Lakers could then use the two and three spots for volume 3-point shooters.
Russ at the point unquestionably makes it harder for the Lakers to put shooters on the court but that doesn’t mean they can’t figure it out. After all, Russell Westbrook gives the Lakers a legitimate Superstar Big Three.
WHAT DOES RUSS HAVE TO DO FOR LAKERS TO WIN?
The Lakers have always been a franchise that thinks big and shoots for the moon so it’s no surprise they opted to gamble on a home run in the form of Russell Westbrook over a solid extra base hit in the form of Buddy Hield.
So how do the Lakers transform their gamble on Westbrook into a win? It all starts with the private meeting Russ had with LeBron and AD at LeBron’s home a couple of weeks before free agency. That meeting ignited the trade. During that meeting, Westbrook told James and Davis he would play whatever role they wanted him to play while LeBron and AD suppsedly said they would be willing to move to the four and five to accomodate Russ.
What do the Lakers need from Westbrook? First, they need his superstar playmaking and attack dog mentality as a point guard to allow James to move to the four and play off the ball to save energy and reduce workload. Second, they need Russ to become a pass first point guard other than when attacking the rim. Russ’ job will be to run the offense and create easy shots for teammates, whether LeBron or AD attacking the rim or 3-point shooters.
Westbrook is so talented that he should be able to continue to average a triple- double as a pass first point guard on the Lakers. If he can average 10 points, 10 assists, and 10 rebounds per game, the Lakers will be champs.
Russ, LeBron, and AD agreeing to play small ball was the trigger that made the Westbrook trade make sense and the biggest strategic change since the Lakers completed the mega trade with the Pels for Davis two years ago.
After two years of accomodating AD’s preference to play the four, the Lakers finally received approval to move Anthony to the five to open up both the shooting guard and small forward positions for needed 3-point shooters. Finally, the Lakers will play their two superstars at their best positions and start games with their best lineup. That change combined with the addition of Russell Westbrook should unleash LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
If Russ is serious about adapting his game to what LeBron and AD need, expect the Lakers to make him a winner and the team to enjoy their best season since LeBron James and Anthony Davis put on purple and gold.
-
Imagine the Lakers trading Kuzma, KCP, and Harrell for a 32-year old superstar like Russell Westbrook and having the media, fans, and oddsmakers all report that you made a major mistake. That’s what happened with the Russell Westbrook trade.
I guess everybody believes the Lakers superstars and coaching staff will be unable to transform Russ from a ‘shoot first’ point guard to a ‘pass first’ point guard. If James Harden can make that switch, then I believe so can Russell Westbrook.
Playing with LeBron is not like playing with KD, Harden, or Beal. Russ knows and respects that. That’s why he went to LeBron’s house to talk about how he, James, and Davis could work together if the Lakers traded for him. I refuse to beleive three intelligent superstars like Russ, LeBron, and Anthony can’t figure this out.
In fact, I think the fact that they decided the right scheme would be to play small ball is a sure sign the subject has been addressed and resolved. Russ knows his job is to get the ball to LeBron and AD attacking the basket and to the corps of elite 3-point shooters Pelinka signed this season. I will bet Russ will focus on that and playing tough on ball defense with the Lakers.
-
The Lakers don’t make major mistakes. And it’s foolish to doubt LeBron James.
-
Let’s see what happens and who really runs the Lakers.
If LeBron and AD are willing to move to the 4 and 5 to accomodate Russ at the 1 and have room for two volume 3-point shooters, then that will be what the Lakers run because LeBron RULES!I also think there could be an element of OK, we tried pampering AD and allowing him to play the four, maybe now’s the time with LeBron’s clock running for the Lakers to put out their best.
At any rate, Russ is the catalyst to this change because once he’s in the lineup, Lakers simply cannot afford to have one of the remaining non-superstar positions be manned by Gasol or Howard, neither of which is really a scoring threat.
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
It’s going to be ‘Game Over’ when the Los Angeles Lakers unleash ‘Monster Ball’ — their long, lethal, bully ball version of small ball — on the rest of the league with Westbrook at the one, James at the four, and Davis at the five.
It took Russell Westbrook meeting with LeBron James and Anthony Davis two weeks before free agency but the Lakers appear to be ready to embrace an enhanced version of the small ball lineup that won the championship. That they traded for Russell Westbrook is a clear sign LeBron James is finally ready to give up being the Lakers’ point guard and Anthony Davis is finally ready to jetisone his objections and accept playing small ball center.
While some doubters and naysayers still predict Vogel will still start Gasol or Howard at center, those with inside info like L.A. Times’ reporter Brad Turner are now reporting James and Davis will start at the four and the five. Rob may be the GM and Frank the coach but the NBA is a superstars’ league and the reason the Lakers are finally going to embrace small ball is the same reason they resisted it before: because that’s what their superstars want.
For a Lakers team that spent two years aggressively reducing the time Davis spent playing the five, the idea of finally joining the modern NBA and embracing small ball with LeBron at the four and AD at the five is exciting.
A Monster Ball Lakers lineup with Westbrook at the one, elite volume 3-point shooters at the two and three, James at the four, and Davis at the five could be the biggest and baddest, fastest and quickest small ball lineup ever.
The NBA got its first taste of the Los Angeles Lakers’ unique version of small ball when they won their 17th championship led by 6′ 9,” 250 lbs LeBron James playing the four and 6′ 10,” 250 lbs Anthony Davis playing the five. James and Davis not only dominated offensively — dropping dunks, raining threes, dishing dimes — but also defensively — making steals, blocking shots, guarding and shutting down the opposing team’s leading scorer.
The Lakers’ bubble version of small ball was probably the best since prime Golden State Warriors’ ‘Death Lineup.’ Unlike the Dubs’ small ball lineup, the Lakers played their version of small ball over half the time in the playoffs. Now it looks like Russ, LeBron, and AD have sold the Lakers on a version of small ball that’s even faster and more physical than we saw in the bubble. One ignited and fueled by Russell Westbrooks’s unstoppable engine.
It’s no secret the Lakers want to return to the small ball style and physicality that won them a championship. The addition of Russell Westbrook was all about the vision he, LeBron, and AD had for Lakers playing Monster Ball.
So why should the Lakers’ version of small ball be called Monster Ball? It’s because the NBA has never seen a small ball lineup that has the pure speed and raw physicality that Russ, LeBron, and AD bring when playing small.
Speed kills and the Lakers traded for Russell Westbrook because no point guard embodies speed the way he does. The Lakers want to run, which is why they traded for Russ and will move LeBron to the four and AD to the five. There’s no way the Lakers are going to slow down their starting lineup by playing slow footed Marc Gasol at the five. Lakers want to take advantage of the speed of their Superstar Big Three and dominate teams in transition.
Physicality is the second component of the Lakers Monster Ball attack. The Lakers sorely missed the bully ball antics and freakish physicality of Dwight Howard last season. Bringing Howard back was one of Pelinka’s priorities. With three of the league’s most physical superstars in Russell Westbrook, LeBron James, and Anthony Davis, the Los Angeles Lakers don’t have to sacrifice size or physicality like other teams do when they opt to go small.
Whether on offense or defense, the Lakers’ Monster Ball lineup with Russ at the one, LeBron at the four, and AD at the five is a superstar fueled and turbo charged version of small ball the likes of which the NBA’s never seen.
We knew the Lakers faced a daunting challenge when free agency started because they didn’t have cap space and had to use their only tradeable contracts — Kuzma, Caldwell-Pope, and Harrell — to trade for Westbrook.
Rather than run it back with last year’s players, the Lakers decided to completely turnover their roster, bringing back only Talen Horton-Tucker to join LeBron James, Anthony Davis, Mark Gasol, and Russell Westbrook. They added Kendrick Nunn via the MLE and Kent Bazemore, Malik Monk, Wayne Ellington, Carmelo Anthony, Trevor Ariza, and Dwight Howard on minimum contracts and Joel Ayayi and Austin Reaves on two-way deals.
Pelinka did a fabulous job building a championship roster by surrounding Westbrook, James, and Davis with elite volume 3-point shooters like Nunn, Ellington, and Monk and proven quality defenders like Howard and Ariza. The result is a roster filled with talented veteran players who complement the Lakers’ Superstar Big Three and are great fits for their run-and-gun small ball offense and trapping, doubling, and rotating aggressive team defense.
The Lakers’ Monster Ball lineup will redefine what playing small means. It’s the ultimate small ball lineup and perfect system to take advantage of speed and physicality of Russell Westbrook, LeBron James, and Anthony Davis.
-
I still believe the meeting between Russell Westbrook, LeBron James, and Anthony Davis (and Jared Dudley) was the most important event to happen for the Los Angeles Lakers this offseason. It was not only the meeting that set the stage for the Lakers home run move to sign Russ but also for the decision to go small with Russ at the one and LeBron and AD moving to the four and five to create a Monster Ball version of small ball.
That meeting by Russ, LeBron, and AD was the only thing that could have changed the direction of the Lakers heading into this offseason. After a disastrous injury plagued year where both LeBron and AD got hurt and the Lakers swung and miss on rent-a-centers Marc Gaol, Montrezl Harrell, and Andre Drummond, it was the Lakers superstars – not their front office or coaching staff – who finally got it right and committed the team to small ball.
Had that meeting not happened, I’m sure we would have seen Frank Vogel starting Dwight Howard, Marc Gasol, or Andre Drummond at center when next season starts. But since the NBA is a superstars’ league, it will be Russ, LeBron, and Anthony who will decide how the Lakers are going to play, not Frank and not Rob. That’s why the Lakers are going to start LeBron at the four and AD at the five and the Lakers are going to win their 18th NBA championship this season.
-
So true. Now, only if we can get another bruising forward as collateral. Me thinking the market is drying out fast.
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The Lakers are on the verge of making a mega mistake. After missing an opportunity to turn Alex Caruso into a trading chip, it looks like the Lakers are going to make the same mistake by letting Dennis Schroder walk.
While Rob Pelinka has done a great job finding shooters after trading for Russell Westbrook, he has put the Lakers at risk of being handcuffed by a lack of viable trading chips at the midseason deadline and next summer. With Talen Horton-Tucker’s $10 million and Kendrick Nunn’s $5 contracts as their only trading chips greater then the minimum salary, the Lakers desperately need to convert Dennis Schroder into a viable trading chip.
If they allow Schroder to walk for nothing like Caruso, the Lakers will only have THT’s and Nunn’s plus eight minimum salary contracts to use to make a trade to upgrade the roster or fill a roster hole at the midseason deadline. Since Horton-Tucker and Nunn are keepers, the Lakers will essentially enter the trade deadline and next summer with no ability to make a major trade unless they’re able to transform Dennis Schroder into a viable trading chip.
It’s probably too late to do anytbing at this point about allowing Caruso to walk without even getting a trade exception back but that’s a mistake the Lakers just cannot make with Schroder regardless of the luxury taxes. Schroder would give the Lakers the viable trading chip they need at the deadline. They could trade him to another team to fill a major need or trade him into another team’s cap space to avoid paying the luxury taxes.
The Lakers’ $189 million in projected luxury taxes for next season now just ranks 6th in the league behind the Warriors’ $362 million leads, Nets’ $306 million, Clippers’ $300 million, Bucks $200 million, and Jazz’ $192 million. With the NBA headed towards an explosion of teams willing to pay luxury taxes, the Lakers need to rethink how much they were willing to pay to build a championship roster because the bar has now been officially raised.
Imagine the difference between the Lakers having a $10 million tradeable contract or trade exception from re-signing or trade-and-signing Dennis Schroder versus having to trade THT or Nunn to improve the roster.
-
It still appears as though the Caruso transaction has not been submitted to the league yet and is not official. I’m hoping this means the Lakers are working in the background to get a trade exception for at least $4 to $5 million. Being able bring in a player making that much would give the Lakers another better than minimum player who would be a perfect trading chip to maybe pair with a couple of minimum players to fill a need or upgrade a position. At any rate, the trade has not been formally announced so I’m keeping my fingers crossed.
Same with the Schroder situation. If Dennis’ head is still in a good place, I wouldn’t mind giving him a $10 million contract as our back up point guard. It’s really his best role and he would keep his Bird rights, which is critical for a player trying to remake himself after a disappointing season. In the end, is there a better place for Dennis to redeem his brand than the Lakers? We need a backup point guard. Dennis needs his Bird rights and redemption. And he would give us a nice $10 million trading chip at the deadline to go with Caruso’s $4-5 million. We would have two assets to trade where we otherwise might have nothing.
-
Did you hear he signed with Chicago after he heard we were trying to trade he and Gasol to Minnesota. Rob’s grade has dropped to a C- for me, only good thing is the Russ trade and the Nunn signing. Kudos to Caruso for taking his career by the reigns and walking away from the Rob Pelinka dumpster fire. AC would have never agreed to go to the dook show that is Minnesota, he’s not a money-grubbing dope like Dennis and just wants to win which is why he fit in so well here. This has gotten pretty embarrassing outside of the quality vet minimums and Nunn signing.
Lakers are definitely pinching pennies (insert mongoslade “remember………” post here again) and it’s going to backfire. This is not win now mode, this is “win now if it doesn’t cost too too much and we don’t have to overpay like those billionaires are gonna do and we can show everyone we’re not like New Jersey!” mode. Russ: good trade. After that? Nothing to crow about. Coming around to the realHTJ’s opinion that this bunch of geriatrics won’t get past the 2nd round on defensive issue alone.
-
-
-
Dennis has 3 choices and not a single one is straight re-signing here to back Russ up. You think LeBron or AD wants a “not all in on this team” guy on the roster like a Dennis? Nope. The bridge has been burned, willfully and stupidly and the Lakers aren’t reaching back across. Hard for me to see the Lakers adding anything more than another vet min deal at this point. They’re pinching pennies and betting Frank can re-create Bubble Magic. This defense won’t be anywhere near as effective as that one. I think the road will be rough if Dwight wants that parade. So, while I don’t see Dennis landing here I don’t see a long list of S&T options. Mainly the question comes down to who wants a backup level who makes demands and has outlandish expectations. There’s. Reason why Reggie Jackson is so thankful he’s making $11 mil the next 2 years. At any rate both parties need to help one another and find livable middle ground. I think the real issue facing the Lakers is that if money is all Dennis wants he can find it overseas and hole to find warmer free agent waters next summer.
-
FWIW the 3 choices are stay in the NBA for a lot less money, stay in the NBA for less role, play overseas and get decent to good money and probably the role he wants…but in Turkey or wherever.
-
The Celtics are said not to want to be hard capped. So he is looking at the mini mid level there. Might find a little more money if he doesn’t mind coming off the bench somewhere but I’m thinking not more then 10 mil at this point. I would also be surprised to see him back.
-
If his head were in the right place, I’d give him $11 million to backup Russ.
We DO need a backup point guard and he’s worth more than $11 million.
And he bould be the perfect trading chip at the deadline or we dump him to avoid the tax.
And Dennis keeps his Brid Rights.
-
Tom, while I mostly agree with the opinions of everyone on this topic, I think your idea of bringing back Dennis as a backup point guard stood out to me the most. I believe Rob and Dennis’s agents are working out something behind closed doors. But your take on Dennis should be given high consideration if it were for me. Dennis as a backup point guard is a win-win situation for both parties and a good way for Dennis to redeem himself. There is no better place to do that better than in L.A. and I am pretty confident something palatable to both parties could be used. As for Dennis, this might
resemble a case where the beggar can’t choose.
-
-
It’s a shame too if he had just played nice, I wouldn’t mind having him as a back up. It’s not a crime to over value yourself but the chatter is that his people were not even in touch with the Lakers while everything was coming down. That’s stupid and disrespectful. Perhaps the Lakers could have worked out something for him before it was too late if he had just cooperated.
-
Yeah, it appears it’s too late but he wants to keep his Bird Rights and the mini-MLE would be humbling.
I’m hoping we work something out where he comes back for a fair price with the understanding he comes off the bench and we’ll try to find the right place for him before the deadline.
$11 million, just $1 million over the full MLE should be a fair price. We DO need a backup point guard. Maybe Dennis is ready to take that role again?
-
-
-
-
-
- Load More Posts
TOM WONG
Founder and Publisher
“Welcome to the new Lakerholics website. We wanted to create a place that would become the favorite online home for informed and passionate Lakers fans.
Please click ‘CONTACT US’ and let us know how we did, ‘JOIN US’ to become a member, or ‘SUBSCRIBE’ to receive our newsletter.
We promise to open your eyes, ears, and mind to brand-new purple and gold world.”
-LakerTom
FEATURED POST
5 Things: It’s the Simple Things
The world of sport is funny, so much is made of nuanced stats and metrics. Graphs and formulas for how you can win populate blogs and websites. “Experts” blab on and on about how analytics has changed sports forever. I don’t buy it. Why? Because when you look at who won and how it usually […]
FEATURED PODCAST
NBA Observations- Big Money Spent For The Clippers And Heat, Are The Lakers Next?
The guys from the Lakers Fast Break return for some NBA Observation as they share thoughts on the recent big-money extensions for Miami coach Erik Spoelstra and the Clipper’s Kawhi Leonard. Does this mean the Lakers will be opening up their wallet a little more as well? Plus after Toronto Raptors coach Darko Rajakovic’s huge rant after the Lakers game because of the fourth-quarter free throw disparity, we ponder if Darvin Ham will ever show that kind of energy if he remains as the guys on the sidelines for LA. We’re back talking some big $$$, and wondering if the Lakers are ready to go on a spending spree? Find out our thoughts on the latest Lakers Fast Break podcast!
Don’t forget to watch the Lakers games with us LIVE at playback.tv/lakersfastbreak and our newest Lakers Fast Break merchandise site is now up at https://tinyurl.com/39yb4ta3, check it out!
Please Like, Share, and Subscribe to our channel and our social media @lakersfastbreak on Twitter.
If you have questions, give us a shout-out on Twitter, YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook, or send us your thoughts to lakersfastbreak@yahoo.com or become a supporter of the Lakers Fast Break today at https://anchor.fm/lakers-fast-break
The views and opinions expressed on the Lakers Fast Break are those of the panelists or guests themselves and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Lakers Fast Break or its owners. Any content or thoughts provided by our panelists or guests are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, anyone, or anything.
Presented by our friends at lakerholics.com, lakersball.com, Pop Culture Cosmos, Inside Sports Fantasy Football, Vampires and Vitae, SynBlades.com, YouTube’s John Mikaelian, the novel Congratulations, You Suck (available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble), The Happy Hoarder, EmpireJeffTV, Larry Lakers Dribbling Chat Chat, Lakers Corner, and Retro City Games!
FEATURED TWEET
Lakers stars used speed and space of transition as stage for talent
https://twitter.com/Lakers/status/1437491268544835595
LAKERHOLICS LINKS
Library of Links to Everything Lakers
LAKERHOLICS MEMBERS
A Los Angeles Lakers Community
ABOUT LAKERHOLICS
Dedicated to Kobe and Gigi Bryant
Recent Comments
WHO’S ONLINE
[who-is-online-now]
I’m still holding my breath hoping that Frank Vogel will not start Marc Gasol and his 1.0 made threes per game at center. The only thing worse than that would be starting Dwight and just giving up on shooting threes despite all the shooters that Rob signed.
I know there are many fans out there who think it would be fine to start Marc even though he does nothing to help protect the rim or create spacing for shooters. All he would do is take up one of the two non-superstar starting positions that the Lakers desperately need to be volume 3-point shooters.
Who will be the volume 3-point shooters? My picks are Nunn at the two and Bazemore at the three although I could also see Wayne Ellington get a shot as he is probably the best shooter on the team.
All of the signs continue to point to LeBron moving to the four and AD the five. It’s what LeBron, AD, and Russ talked about before free agency. The Lakers also don’t appear to be looking for a third center. They tried unsuccessfully to trade Gasol in the offseason and I think there’s still a chance he will be replaced by a shot blocker.
The one big remaining question for the Lakers this offseason is will Frank go small.