WELCOME TO LAKERHOLICS
A Virtual Community for Lakers Fans
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The ongoing internal debate over whether the Lakers should revert back to two-big model used to win the 2020 championship in the bubble will likely determine what kind of Lakers team we see once the 2023–24 season starts.
Whether to revert to playing two-bigs is a debate the Lakers would likely not be having if there were clear-cut starters at each position. Without five clear starters, the question becomes what’s the best strategy for this roster? While the competition in training camp and preseason could change who starts and who comes off the bench, the Lakers clearly would like to start two-bigs like they did during their 2020 championship run in the bubble.
Right now, the Lakers are looking to add a starting center who can stretch the floor and balance the skillsets of their other center Jaxson Hayes, whom they see as a traditional defensive center similar to Dwight Howard. The primary candidate to be the Lakers’ stretch center is Christian Wood, who’s still hoping to get an offer for more than the veteran’s minimum. Other possible candidates include Davis Bertans and Markieff Morris.
Should the Lakers not sign Wood or a player who could start at center, they would then likely opt to start Jaxson Hayes at the five with Anthony Davis returning to his preferred four, except when he closes games at the five.
While the Lakers consider Hayes to be a defensive center in the mode of Howard or McGee, Jaxson has potential as a 3-point shooter and shot 35% from deep the year before last, making 20 of 57 threes over 70 games.If the Lakers don’t find a stretch center to sign, they could turn to a veteran defensive center like Bismack Biyombo, who could start next to Davis or come off the bench. Right now, they’re holding out for a stretch five center. The Lakers could also decide Hachimura was the best stretch five option and go with him and AD as the two-bigs. Finally, a still growing Vanderbilt might have worked hard this summer and improved his 3-point shot.
So let’s look at the push and the pros and cons of the Lakers reverting back to the two-bigs model of 2020 where Wood or Hayes would start at the five with Davis at the four until he takes over the five to close out the game.
The Push For Two-Bigs
For the second straight season, there’s a push for the Lakers to play two-bigs during the regular season like they did during their championship run in the bubble back with Davis at the four and Howard or McGee at the five.
Unfortunately, the disappointing play of Damian Jones and Thomas Bryant eliminated that option and forced the Lakers to go small during last year’s regular season with Anthony Davis at the five and LeBron James at the four. Needless to say, the roster’s lack of size at almost every position led to the Lakers being consistently outrebounded and struggling in the season and the playoffs to defend bigger players who were simply shooting over them.
One of the Lakers’ major goals this offseason was to fix their relative size disadvantage at every position by getting bigger in the backcourt, finding a second big to start at center, and moving James and Davis down a position. Lakers added size at point guard in 6′ 4″ Gabe Vincent and 6′ 6″ Jalen Hood-Schifino, at shooting guard in 6′ 7″ Maxwell Lewis, at small forward in 6′ 8″ Taurean Prince and 6′ 8″ Cam Reddish, and at center in 6′ 11″ Jaxson Hayes.
The Lakers’ desire to revert to the two-bigs model they used to win their 17th NBA championship in the bubble back in 2020 has them looking to add a more offensive oriented center like Christian Wood as their 14th player. With the Lakers signing Davis to a 3-year extension to lock him up for five years, they want to optimize the new face of the franchise, surround him with talent, and allow him to play his preferred power forward position.
Ironically, playing two-bigs gives the Lakers the opportunity to insert a front court player who can help the team improve their floor spacing by adding a lethal 3-point shooter at a position ripe for major mismatches. Starting a stretch five is probably the single easiest way for the Lakers to improve their team spacing as last season’s starting front court of James and Davis shot poorly from deep, shooting 32.1% and 25.7% respectively.
The push to play two-bigs has the Lakers essentially doubling down on their formula for winning by using size to dominate points-in-the-paint and made free throws and offset their not being a great 3-point shooting team.
The Pros For Two-Bigs
The pros for the Lakers playing two-bigs start with obvious advantages of being bigger at every position — more rebounds, points-in-the-paint, and made free throws — plus less wear-and-tear on superstars James and Davis.
Last season, the Lakers finished 6th in rebounding with 44.7 rebound per game but 25th in opponent rebounding by allowing 44.9 rebounds per game. In other words, the Lakers lost the rebounding battle last season. The hope would be by bringing in another 7-footer to start at the five and moving Anthony Davis down to the four and LeBron James down to the three, the Lakers would then be able to control the boards this season.
The same logic holds true for points-in-the-paint and made free throws. Last season, the Lakers finished 6th with 54.5 points-in-the-paint but 23rd by allowing 52.8 points-in-the-paint by opponents, a plus 1.7 differential. Last season, the Lakers’ 20.6 made free throws per game was 2nd while their 16.1 opponent free throws made was 1st in NBA. The Lakers hope playing two-bigs will increase points-in-the-paint and made free throws.
Playing two-bigs also gives the Lakers an opportunity to insert a modern stretch five center into their starting lineup who can stretch the floor and improve the team’s poor front court 3-point shooting by James and Davis. Adding Christian Wood or even a small ball five like Davis Bertans or Markieff Morris could significantly improve the Lakers’ floor spacing. There’s no reason Lakers playing two-bigs sacrifices 3-point shooting.
Finally, maybe the biggest reason the Lakers want to play two-bigs is to allow Anthony Davis to play his preferred position of power forward as he takes the baton from LeBron James and becomes the face of the franchise. The Lakers need to reduce their reliance on their two superstars, hopefully even embracing some load management by limiting them to 30 minutes per game. I know LeBron and AD hate load management but they need it.
Bottom line, the Lakers need to play two-bigs because it will improve their rebounding, points-in-the-paint, made free throws, and 3-point shooting and reduce reliance and workloads of LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
The Cons Against Two-Bigs
The cons against the Lakers playing two-bigs revolve around how it would hurt their spacing, rely too much on Jaxson Hayes, move Anthony Davis away from the rim, and wear LeBron James out defending small forwards.
How another big affects the Lakers’ spacing will depend on which big. While the Lakers won the title in 2020 with non-shooters Dwight Howard and JaVale McGee starting at center, that may not work in today’s NBA. That’s why the Lakers want Christian Wood, whose great offensive skills, including lethal 3-point shooting, would modernize the team’s front court and actually help spread the court so LeBron and AD can attack the rim.
Spacing becomes a major issue if the Lakers cannot sign Christian Wood. Do they settle for a small ball five like Bertans or Morris? Or do they instead start Jaxson Hayes or a defensive center like Bismack Biyombo. While he may not be their first choice, the Lakers are confident that Jaxson Hayes can be their starting center and see him as very much in the mode of Dwight Howard or JaVale McGee. They’re counting on Jaxson Hayes.
The other major cons against two-bigs is that it moves Anthony Davis from the five, where he has been a dominant force at both ends of the court, and moves LeBron James to the three, where he’ll be challenged defensively. For the last three years, Anthony Davis and LeBron James have started at the five and four, partly because the Lakers just could not seem to find a starting quality center to pair with AD. There’s risk in changing positions.
Many observers believe center is Anthony Davis’ best position because he ends up playing closer to the basket and thus making a higher percentage of his shots. They especially worry that AD can no longer shoot the three. Meanwhile, there’s no question that power forward is a better position for 38-year old LeBron James to play than small forward. The last thing the Lakers want is LeBron chasing shooters around and through screens.
If the Lakers opt to play two-bigs, they’ll have to figure out how to deal with spacing, how to get Jaxson Hayes to fill the starting center role, and how to help LeBron James and Anthony Davis deal with changing positions.
-
LakerTom1 year, 3 months ago
-
The Pros For Two-Bigs
The pros for the Lakers playing two-bigs start with obvious advantages of being bigger at every position — more rebounds, points-in-the-paint, and made free throws — plus less wear-and-tear on superstars James and Davis.https://t.co/LkYSngWq7g— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 27, 2023
-
The Cons Against Two-Bigs
The cons against the Lakers playing two-bigs revolve around how it would hurt their spacing, rely too much on Jaxson Hayes, move Anthony Davis away from the rim, and wear LeBron James out defending small forwards.https://t.co/LkYSngWq7g pic.twitter.com/nlNQsy4Z5J— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 27, 2023
-
Aloha Tom, up to this point, the Lakers really haven’t made it clear as to how they want to use two bigs. They just said they were interested in trying some two big packages again. The automatic assumption by many was that they want to start two bigs. But that has not been stated. I could see a situation where they could bring in another big when LeBron rests. I just don’t see them starting LeBron at the 3. When you have PatBev guarding guys like PG and Tatum instead of LeBron, that says a lot. Through out the playoffs Brooks was the only wing that LeBron was assigned to for any meaningful minutes and that was because he can’t shoot. They definitely need to sign one more center but until I hear it from the team I’m not sold that they want to have a center starting games with AD.
-
Aloha, Michael. You could be right. They wanted to do the same last year and we know how that turned out. Neither Jones or Bryant could earn the starting role. I think the Lakers will give Wood or Hayes or even Biyombo a shot at starting. I think they want to play two-bigs if they can find a center who works. Expect a lot of testing of options. Most likely, somebody is going to show they need to start and that will solve the problem.
As for the LeBron at the three issue, I think it’s just another of the matchup issues we will face every game. Best solution is to have as many good defenders on the court as possible. I do agree with you that we don’t want LeBron chasing shooters around screens.
I think we strategically address the matchup issues just like we do with any player. Get him help. Have him dominate at the other end. Maybe even have AD guard certain wings where his length can defend. I think there will be times when LeBron will rest as usual on defense and we’ll pay the price.
Overall, he usually outplays whomever he’s matched up with so I think we can adjust. The Lakers must believe the same because it’s obvious they want to play two-bigs. The only question is will they have the right players to do it.
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
While Rob Pelinka and Darvin Ham have done a great job transforming the Lakers into legitimate contenders, their greatest achievement could turn out to be how they’ve positioned the team to transition from LeBron James.
As Kobe’s agent, Pelinka remembers how tough it was on the Lakers after the team gave Bryant his last big contract and it took a decade to recover and win after Mamba retired. Rob’s committed not to let that happen again. Every move the Lakers made at the trade deadline and this summer was part of a plan to create a roster that could both win without LeBron James and complement and empower Anthony Davis as team’s alpha superstar.
While all the talk of retirement may be premature, Pelinka and Ham know the coming year could be the last year LeBron James wears purple and gold. He might retire or might leave to play with Bronny on another team. The Lakers must be ready to move on. They worked hard over the last year remaking the roster into a legitimate contender and cleaning up their cap sheet so that they have a bevy of tradable contracts and draft capital.
Pelinka and Ham not only built a championship caliber roster that could give James and Davis a chance to win this season but they did it exclusively with younger players specifically chosen for their fits with AD’s timeline. The Lakers did not even add a single player over 30 years of age. Instead, they added young, big, long, athletic players who better fit AD’s timeline and would still be in their prime long after LeBron James had retired.
As the Lakers add the final touches to next season’s roster, Pelinka and Ham have the team perfectly positioned to make a smooth and successful three-step transition from LeBron James to the Anthony Davis era.
Step 1: Agreeing Upon Anthony Davis’ Extension
Step 1 to transition from LeBron James is getting Anthony Davis to sign an extension. Davis will be eligible on August 4th to sign a 3-year $167.6 million extension, committing him to the Lakers for 5-years $251.4 million.
While critics can complain about the games missed due to injuries and the inconsistency on offense, Pelinka and Ham know how essential Anthony Davis is to the Los Angeles Lakers’ current or future championship hopes. The Lakers would be fools to try and trade Davis with this possibly being James’ last year in purple and gold. Internally, the Lakers know they have no option other than to go all-in on Anthony Davis at this point in time.
By locking Davis up for the next five years, the Lakers get the anchor they need to make a smooth and successful transition from LeBron James. It also allows James the freedom to stay with the team as long as he wants. The Lakers know they need continuity to win championships and that starts with locking up Davis for the next five years. Look closely and you can see this roster was built more for Anthony Davis than LeBron James.
The Lakers expressed desire to return to the two-bigs model they used to win the 2020 championship in the bubble is another sign that the Lakers are committed to signing superstar Anthony Davis to a 3-year extension. The Lakers grand plan is to move forward with Anthony Davis and a second superstar who would replace LeBron James, They’ve built a roster that should make them the most coveted landing spot for NBA superstars.
And that is how it should be going forward. Maybe LeBron will bounce back and hold Father Time off for another year but the Lakers are betting on this being Anthony Davis’ team and AD taking the torch from LeBron.
Step 2: Building Roster To Complement Anthony Davis
Step 2 to transition from LeBron James is building a roster to complement and empower Anthony Davis, which is exactly what Pelinka and Ham have successfully been doing since the trade deadline and over the summer.
The Lakers signing Anthony Davis to an extension and then suddenly wanting to revert back to the two-big model used to win their 17th championship in not coincidence. It’s the Lakers doing what AD wants. From the day he joined the Lakers, AD has always been willing to play the five when needed but preferred to play the four. That’s why the Lakers are so focused on Christian Wood. They want a stretch five to play with AD.
And while Pelinka and Ham built a team that could contend for a title, they also did something remarkable in its success and daring, which is build a roster designed to complement Anthony Davis instead of LeBron James; Look at the ages of the players the Lakers have assembled: James 38, Davis 30, Prince 29, Russell 27, Vincent 27, Reaves 25, Hachimura 25, Vanderbilt 24, Hayes 23, Reddish 23, Lewis 20, Hood-Schifino 20, Christie 20.
LeBron James and Anthony Davis are the only Lakers players on the roster over 30-years old. This roster was specifically built for Anthony Davis’ championship window rather than LeBron James possible last season.
The only ways the Lakers acquire a superstar to replace LeBron James is to trade for one or sign one as a free agent. What Pelinka and Ham have done is collect assets that give the Lakers great flexibility to replace James.The Lakers have one final roster spot to fill, which they plan to fill with a stretch big who space the court and provide more shooting. Top candidates are Christian Wood, Bismack Biyombo, Rudy Gay, and Davis Bertans.
Step 3: Acquiring LeBron James’ Replacement
Step 3 to transition from LeBron James is acquiring the superstar player to replace him, which is always the most difficult step to accomplish. The Lakers can either sign James’ replacement in free agency or trade for him.
How the Lakers replace LeBron will depend on when and how he decides to leave the team. James has a player option for next season, which could make him an free agent next year if he were to exercise it next summer. What James decides will obviously depend heavily on what happens this season. It’s also possible that LeBron feels so good about his own health and the team the Lakers have put together that he signs an extension.
Frankly, the last thing the Lakers want to see is LeBron exercise his player option and retire next season as there is no way with their recent additions that they could clear enough cap space to replace James via free agency. They’re hoping LeBron will decline his player option and play out the last two years of his contract. That would allow for teams, players, and fans to enjoy the farewell tour LeBron deserves for all he’s done for the NBA.
Strategically, that would allow the Lakers to potentially position themselves to be able to clear enough cap space to use James’ expiring salary to sign his replacement via free agency or trade or sign-and-trade for a superstar. After the 2024–25 season, the Lakers would have 6 players under contract for $89 million in salaries. With a projected salary cap of $156 million, the Lakers should easily be able to clear cap space for a max salary superstar.
While it wouldn’t surprise anybody if Davis and James both ended up signing extensions, the Lakers project LeBron James to decline his 2024–25 player option and play the final year of his contract before finally retiring.
-
Pelinka and Ham have Lakers perfectly positioned to make a smooth successful 3-step transition from James to Davis era:
Step 1: Agree to AD's Extension
Step 2: Building Roster around AD
Step 3: Acquire LeBron replacementhttps://t.co/eVS7r7W074— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 22, 2023
-
Pelinka and Ham not only built a championship caliber roster that could give James and Davis a chance to win this season but they did it exclusively with younger players specifically chosen for their fits with AD’s timeline.https://t.co/eVS7r7W074
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 22, 2023
-
Every move the Lakers made at the trade deadline and this summer was part of a plan to create a roster that could both win without LeBron James and complement and empower Anthony Davis as team’s alpha superstar.https://t.co/eVS7r7W074
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 22, 2023
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
If we’re to believe Rob Pelinka, one of the major changes the Lakers could be planning to deploy for the coming season is to go “back to the two-big model they used” to win their 2020 NBA Championship in the bubble.
Pelinka told ESPN the Lakers “have had talks with Anthony Davis about going back to the two-big model they used with Dwight Howard/JaVale McGee.” He also said “it was a big reason why Jaxson Hayes was signed.” Before Pelinka’s comments, Rui Hachimura was expected to be the fifth starter along with James, Davis, Reaves, and Russell. Not it looks as if the Lakers may also experiment in training camp with Jaxon Hayes starting.
During their 2020 championship regular season and playoffs, the Lakers two-big lineups dominated points-in-the-paint by 7.0 points per game while remaining close with respect to free throws made and 3-pointers made. Unfortunately, the move to play more small ball with Anthony Davis at center during the next three seasons led to the Lakers’ points-in-the-paint differential and positional size advantage completely disappearing.
That’s why the Lakers’ desire to return to the two-big model that won the championship should be a smart move, especially after losing to the bigger Nuggets and watching more and more teams opting to go with two-bigs.
Why Lakers Should Start Jaxson Hayes at Center
Starting Jaxson Hayes at the five with Anthony Davis at the four in a two-big lineup is more about the Lakers’ need to get bigger to dominate the boards and the paint than a pressing need to find minutes for the young 7-footer.
Frankly, by going big, the Lakers are essentially doubling down on their proven game strategy of winning the points-in-the-paint and free-throws-made competitions by more than they lose the the 3-point competition. Starting two bigs also makes a lot of sense to help the Lakers navigate the long regular season. It can help win games and reduces the wear-and-tear on Anthony Davis to keeps him fresh and healthy for the playoffs.
That’s not to say that Jaxson Hayes is not a talented young player with great size and athleticism. At 7′ 0″ and 220 lbs, Hayes’ four years with the Pelicans is filled with highlight reels of thunderous dunks and eye-dropping blocks. In his third season with the Pels, Hayes started 28 games and averaged 9.3 points, 4.5 boards, 0.6 assists, 0.8 blocks, and 0.6 steals in 20.0 minutes per game shooting 55.1% from field, 35.1% from deep, 76.6% from the line.
Unfortunately, Hayes’ fourth season was derailed by injuries that led to his play regressing and limited him to just 47 games. In the end, the Pelicans decided it was best to let Jaxson Hayes walk for nothing as a free agent.
The Lakers are hoping they can reach Hayes and get him to buy in to doing what they need from him as a big playing with and without Anthony Davis. The Lakers hope their staff can do for Hayes’ what they did for Monk.Hayes doesn’t need to play like an all star for the Lakers two-big model to work. All he has to do is play solid drop coverage, rebound the ball, and protect the rim on defense and dunk every chance he gets on offense.
His presence alone with transform the Lakers’ dynamic at both ends and free up LeBron James and Anthony Davis to slide down a position and enjoy positional size advantage to dominate the paint going forward.The Lakers wanted to go back to the two-big model to start last season but neither Damian Jones or Thomas Bryant was good enough to fill the starter role so the Lakers were forced to revert back to Anthony Davis at center. There’s a good chance that Jaxson Hayes will prove capable of holding down the starting center role next to Anthony Davis. It may not happen immediately but it’s high on the Lakers list of priorities for next season.
The Los Angeles Lakers need to restore the positional size advantage they enjoyed when they won their 17th championship in 2020 by starting 7′ 0″ center Jaxson Hayes alongside 6′ 11″ Anthony Davis in a two-big lineup.
Why Lakers Should NOT Start Jaxson Hayes at Center
The main reason the Lakers should not start the Jaxson Hayes at center alongside Anthony Davis in a two-big lineup because playing two bigs who don’t even shoot 30% from deep does not work in the modern NBA.
What the Lakers need to realize is this is no longer 2020. LeBron and AD are three years older and the teams with whom they’re competing are bigger and better than the ones they faced and defeated in the bubble. Strategically, what the Lakers need in a starting center is a legitimate stretch five who has the 3-point gravity to insure his defender remains attached and isn’t sagging off to pack the paint against LeBron and AD.
While the Lakers would like to return to the two-big model, they realize the only way they can effectively do that is with a center who can shoot the ball and space the floor rather than a traditional defensive oriented center. That’s why the Lakers are interested in Christian Wood, who not only has the size and length to protect the rim but also is an elite 3-level scorer who has shot over 50% from the field and over $37% from deep the last 4 years.
While the Lakers are hoping to be able to sign Christian Wood to a free agent minimum salary contract, there’s potential competition from the Chicago Bulls and Miami Heat that could end up paying him more money. Wood is holding out hoping the Bulls, Heat, or Lakers will end up offering him more than the minimum. He desperately wants to avoid the negative stigma of having to accept a veteran’s minimum salary to stay in the league.
The Lakers do have the ability to pull off a sign-and-trade with the Mavs for Christian Wood but it would mean trading fan favorite Jarred Vanderbilt, who will be on the final year of his very favorable $4.7 million contract. One major benefit of trading for Wood is it gives the Lakers his Bird rights so they could go over the cap to re-sign him instead of possibly losing him to free agency like happened with Malik Monk and Lonnie Walker.
As for Hayes, the Lakers see him as more in the Howard/McGee mold of defensive center who starts and eats minutes but doesn’t close games in the regular season and becomes the backup center off bench in the playoffs. While he’s not Christian Wood, Jaxson Hayes shot 35.1% while making 57 threes in 70 games 2 years ago and has consistently shot over 70% from the line since being in the league. Only 23, he could develop into a stretch 4/5.
The Lakers desire to play two-bigs could shape the team’s starting lineup for the coming season. Whether Christian Wood or Jaxson Hayes, the Lakers focus in camp and preseason will be testing the two-big model.
-
That’s why the Lakers’ desire to return to the two-big model that won the championship should be a smart move, especially after losing to the bigger Nuggets and watching more and more teams opting to go with two-bigs.https://t.co/uUMOLJ0HJQ
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 19, 2023
-
Why Lakers Should Start Hayes at Center
Starting Hayes at five with Davis at four in a 2-big lineup is more about Lakers’ need to get bigger to dominate boards paint than pressing need to find minutes for young 7-footer.https://t.co/LOCNFzTHAuhttps://t.co/uUMOLJ0HJQ
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 19, 2023
-
I’m happy the Lakers have decided to get bigger. That’s an important strategic decision I like. AD will split time at 4 and 5. Which he starts as will depend on who the 14th player will be.
It’s obviously easier to do that than to suddenly start shooting threes better. Have to double down on what worked. Points in paint and made free throws. The Lakers’ formula.
Still have my fingers crossed that the Lakers land Wood. I think it’s 50/50 that the Lakers get him. I do think there’s a chance it will be via a S&T for maybe $5M and PO’s on 2nd and 3rd years. That way Lakers get 1-year trial and keep Bird rights while Wood gets chance to redeem his game and image and win a ring.
If no Wood, then I think we will try out Hayes starting in camp and maybe even give him the green light to shoot wide open threes. If he’s smart, he’s been working on that every single hour of the day. He’s a good free throw shooter and did shoot 35% two years ago. Anyway, we need him to eat up reg season minutes. AD would become backup 5 and close reg season games.
Deal with playoffs based on matchups.
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
Just when you thought the Lakers were done making trades this offseason, the Dallas Mavericks raised the possibility that they might be willing to make Christian Wood available in a sign-and-trade for the right player.
This news immediately raised the possibility of the Dallas Mavericks signing-and-trading stretch forward/center Christian Wood for the Los Angeles Lakers ace defensive forward and fan favorite Jarred Vanderbilt. The 27-year old 6′ 9,” 214 lb Wood is the perfect stretch four/five the Lakers need to create space and driving lanes for superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis to attack the paint and get to the rim for easy baskets.
While trading Vanderbilt would be a tough pill to swallow, Wood is a greater overall talent and better fit for what LeBron James and Anthony Davis need right now, which is a modern center who can stretch the floor. Under the new CBA rules for team’s under the hard cap, the Lakers could accept a 3-year sign-and-trade contract for as much as $9.6 million per year giving them Wood’s Bird rights so they could go over the cap to re-sign him.
The Lakers should trade for Christian Wood to upgrade the team’s 3-point shooting, add a clutch scorer to close games, increase team’s positional size advantage, secure Wood’s Bird rights, and open a roster spot for Biyombo.
1. Upgrade Team’s 3-Point Shooting
Christian Wood is exactly the kind of elite shooter with 3-point gravity to keep defenders attached and open up floor space and driving lanes for Lakers’ superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis to get to the rim.
During the 2022–23 season, the Los Angeles Lakers 31.2 3-point attempts per game ranked 27th, their 10.8 3-point shots made per game ranked 24th, and their 34.6% 3-point completion percentage ranked 25th in the league. During the playoffs, the Lakers 33.5 3-point attempts per game ranked 14th out of 16 teams, their 10.1 3-point shots made per game ranked 13th, and their 33.5% 3-point completion percentage ranked 11th in the league.
In last four seasons, Wood has made 37.6%, 39.0%, and 37.4%, and 38.6% from deep. During those 4 years, he made 367 out of 961 3-point attempts for a completion percentage of 38.2% on 4.0 3-point attempts per game. During his last three years, Vanderbilt averaged 32.2%, 14.3%, and 20% from deep. During those 3 years, he made 32 out of 109 3-point attempts for a completion percentage of 29.4% on 0.5 3-point attempts per game.
One of advantages of trading Vanderbilt for Wood is it would dramatically improve the Lakers 3-point shooting volume and percentage and create better spacing for superstars James and Davis to attack the paint and rim.
2. Adds Clutch Scorer To Close Games
One can question Wood’s defensive inconsistencies and issues but, with his size and athleticism, he was the NBA’s most efficient three-level scorers in the league, able to score efficiently from deep, midrange, or at the rim.
Over the last four years, Wood averaged 16.6, 17.9, 21.0, 13.1 points in 25.9, 30.8, 32.3, 21.4 minutes per game while shooting 51.5%, 50.1%, 51.4%, 56.7% from the field and 37.6%, 39.0%, 37.4%, 38.6% on 3-point shots.
Wood is a proven three-level scorer who can efficiently shoot the three ball, pull up for a midrange jumper, or attack the rim with vicious dunks. He would give the Lakers a great third option to close games in the clutch.One of the Lakers biggest weaknesses was not having an elite offensive scorer whom they could give the ball to get a shot to close out games. Christian Wood would give the Lakers a clutch scorer to close out games. The Lakers desperately need a player like DeRozan, Bogdanovic, or Wood who can get to his spot and get a high quality shot whenever he wants. Watch the above video and you can see Wood’s upside is elite starter.
Unlike featuring LeBron who’s slowing down or AD who needs somebody to get him the ball, the Lakers can just give the ball to Wood and trust him to go one-on-one and get a great shot regardless who’s defending him.
3. Increases Positional Size Advantage
One of the advantages of the Lakers trading for Christian Wood is he gives them a perfect stretch four or five to play alongside Anthony Davis in a two-big lineup like the Lakers ran to win the 2020 championship in the bubble.
By starting the 6′ 9″ Christian Wood next to the 6′ 11″ Anthony Davis and 6′ 9″ LeBron James, the Los Angeles Lakers immediately become a bigger and better team at both ends of the court, dominating the boards and paint. During the last four four years, Christian averaged 7.3, 10.1, 9.6, and 6.3 rebounds per game, 1.1, 1.0, 1.2, and 0.9 blocks per game, and 0.4, 0.8, 0.8, and 0.5 steals per game in 25.9, 30.8, 32.3, and 21.4 minutes per game.
While there have been troubling incidents in the past, the Lakers coaching staff knows how to reach players and get the best out of them. Were a sign-and-trade to happen, there’d definitely be direct discussions with Wood. There’s always the risk that the player is just incorrigible and even Darvin Ham cannot reach him but the reward is essentially the opportunity to trade for a lottery level talent who could be a long-time star for the team.
Trading for Christian Wood would give the Lakers positional size advantage in the front court while at the same time improving the teams floor spacing and 3-point shooting and unleashing even more paint and rim dominance.
4. Secures Christian Wood’s Bird Rights
While it’s difficult to trade a fan favorite who was at the heart of the team making the conference finals after starting 2–10, securing Christian Wood’s Bird rights so they could keep him long term is worth Jarred Vanderbilt.
The Lakers’ front office and coaching staff have great confidence in their judgement and ability to transform talented young players who’ve struggled with other teams and help them rehabilitate their careers like Malik Monk. Trading for Christian Wood instead of signing him for the minimum as a free agent would give the Lakers his Bird rights, which would enable them to go over the cap to re-sign him and prevent losing him like Malik Monk.
Christian Wood is in many ways the perfect third big for the Lakers as he can play the four or five, has the ability to space the floor with his 3-point shooting, and can protect the rim with his 6′ 9″ height and 7′ 3″ wingspan. While trading for Christian Wood will cost Vando and bring risks due to previous behavior issues, the upside of being able to acquire a potential second level star player is too great an opportunity for the Lakers to pass.
If the Lakers believe they can transform Christian Wood into a valuable stretch four/five, then it makes sense to trade Jarred Vanderbilt for him so that L.A. has his Bird rights and can go over the cap to re-sign him.
5. Opens Roster Spot for Biyombo
With the free agent signing of 6′ 8″ small forward Taurean Prince, the Los Angeles Lakers finally have a legitimate 3&D wing who can shoot over 40% from deep and defend the bigger wing scorers Vando would usually guard.
In addition to Prince, the Lakers also re-signed Rui Hachimura and signed Cam Reddish, both of whom they’re high on offensively and defensively. Trading Vanderbilt should eliminate a likely minutes jam up at the three. Trading for Wood helps balance the roster and opens up a roster spot for Bismack Biyombo, who would give the Lakers an experienced defensive center to expand and balance the team’s skill sets at the center position.
At 27-years old, the opportunity for the Lakers to trade Jarred Vanderbilt for a signed-and-traded Christian Wood is almost too good to be true. That it helps balance the roster and opens a roster spot for Bismack is a plus. Realistically, this is the kind of move the Lakers would have to wait until the trade deadline to pull off. It’s exactly the kind of low risk, sky-high value opportunity Rob Pelinka should take full and immediate advantage of.
Trading a one-dimensional small forward in Jarred Vanderbilt for a versatile modern center in Christian Wood would enable the Lakers to sign Bismack Biyombo as their third center while leaving one roster spot open.
-
5 Reasons Lakers Should Trade Jarred Vanderbilt for Christian Wood
1. Upgrade Team’s 3-Point Shooting
2. Adds Clutch Scorer To Close Games
3. Increases Positional Size Advantage
4. Secures Christian Wood’s Bird Rights
5. Opens Roster Spot for Biyombohttps://t.co/QvJDbUR6Hc— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 17, 2023
-
5 Reasons Lakers Should Trade Jarred Vanderbilt for Christian Wood
1. Upgrade Team’s 3-Point Shooting.
In last 4 seasons, Wood shot 37.6%, 39.0%, 37.4%, % 38.6% from deep. He made 367 of 961 3PA for 3P% of 38.2% on 4.0 3-point attempts per game.https://t.co/QvJDbUR6Hc pic.twitter.com/clsVt7R1ql— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 17, 2023
-
5 Reasons Lakers Should Trade Vanderbilt for Christian Wood
2. Adds Clutch Scorer To Close Games
Last 4 years, Wood posted 16.6, 17.9, 21.0, 13.1 points in 25.9, 30.8, 32.3, 21.4 mpg shooting 51.5%, 50.1%, 51.4%, 56.7% from field.https://t.co/QvJDbUR6Hc https://t.co/TBB7ScEeIb— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 17, 2023
-
5 Reasons Lakers Should Trade Vanderbilt for Wood
3. Increases Positional Size Advantage
Lakers trading for Wood is gives them a perfect stretch four or five to play next to AD in 2-big lineup like 2020 championship in bubble.https://t.co/Lvw10EETVq— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 17, 2023
-
5 Reasons Lakers Should Trade Vanderbilt for Wood
4. Secures Christian Wood’s Bird Rights
If Lakers believe they can transform Wood into a valuable stretch four/five, then it makes sense to trade Jarred Vanderbilt for him so they have his Bird rights.https://t.co/QvJDbUR6Hc pic.twitter.com/YygIfgi63W— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 17, 2023
-
5 Reasons Lakers Should Trade Vanderbilt for Wood
5. Opens Roster Spot for Biyombo
Trading one-dimensional small forward in Vanderbilt for versatile modern center in Wood would enable Lakers to sign Biyombo as third center leaving one roster spot open.https://t.co/QvJDbUR6Hc pic.twitter.com/zhEBFTx0fP— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 17, 2023
-
I didn’t think we were in the business of trading good for bad? Hard pass, terrible trade on every front. I’m starting to think you’re a Mavs fan with all these ludicrous trades that make us worse and Dallas better. Dallas wants nothing to do with Wood, likely considers his mere presence as toxic…and you want to trade one of the guys who was key in us even making it to the playin? Is this a master class in terrible ideas? A TED Talk on how to destroy momentum? This is, by far, the worst idea posted here since yesterday.
Wood for the vet minimum or he can find another door to grovel at and beg for a bone. He’s just not that important or good. You don’t get moved from 7 teams in 7 years with his skill set (but not impact on winning…) for no reason. The dude is a joke player who puts up decent numbers on bad teams that go nowhere. Have you really even watched him play, other than in Laker games?
Not what the team needs and it won’t matter if he shoots 50% from three. Nobody is leaving the paint against the Lakers with LeBron and AD on the roster. It really is that simple because a 35-40% three point shot is vastly better than AD or LeBron at the rim in terms of shots the defense wants to give up. This is why three point marks-people come here to die. It’s really not a difficult notion to grasp…and yet…
It’s astounding to me that, within a matter of days, you’ve gone from proclaiming Rob a genius for assembling this roster to trading pretty much the entire roster he assembled, without even having seen a louse preseason game. Usually for unattainable talents.
Wake me up when training camp starts, this is just silly stuff.
-
It’s funny how click bait works. Stein said the Lakers were probably not open to trading for Wood. He mentioned that Vando would be the only guy they could trade. Suddenly we are interested in trading Vando for Wood, which is not what Stein said. I think the Lakers maybe interested in signing Wood for the minimum but there is zero indication that they have interest beyond that. One wonders if Wood could get on the court if he defends like he has. It’s not like Wood is a top notch volume 3 point shooter. He has never even averaged 2 makes a game. I was encouraged by Rui’s play and apparently so we’re the Lakers judging by his contract. I see no reason to believe that he can’t match Woods shooting plus he successfully defended 2 through 5 in the playoffs. What has Wood done in the playoffs? Rui D included banging with the Joker, something Wood at 214 pound would have trouble doing. We also signed Prince who is every bit as good at shooting the 3 as wood plus, he can defend. Then there is Vando. How many 6’ 9” guys can defend Ja. Vando did. He was assigned to the most dangerous perimeter player every game. While Prince is a good defender, he’s not as versatile as Vando. Now last year was the first year he took any meaningful amount of 3 point shots. And he shot 32% I see no reason that can’t increase. I think this is all mute because Vando is a Ham guy. You add Wood to the line up and you have hurt what got us that far in the playoffs. Add Wood and now you have to move LeBron to the 3, where he’s not been good. Add Dlo to the equation and now the only defenders starting are AD and Austin. Even if we do end up signing Wood, I suspect he will come off the bench.
-
It was really Sam Quinn of CBS Sports who made the link and suggested while not endorsing the Vando for Wood trade. He also said he did not think the Lakers valued Wood enough to trade Vando.
Vando only has one year left on his deal and will be looking for a bigger extension. Quinn pointed out we do have too many wings and trading Vando would open up minutes for Prince, Hachimura, and Reddish.
And the Lakers need a stretch 4/5 and Wood is nothing but consistent in shooting over 50% from the field and 37% from deep. He is a legit 3-level scorer who can splash an open three or throw down a ferocious dunk.
Lakers should work out S&T with Dallas for him, Even giving up Vando, it’s still low risk, mega reward opportunity. Wood lets Lakers go to two-bigs model to start and play small ball on steroids to close games.
-
CHRISTIAN WOOD, the over-looked legend 7 other teams dumped faster than bad lamb shanks from a meat wheel, whose past issues can be mitigated by our coaching staff because guys like Jason Kidd, Jared Dudley, Stephen Silas, Alvin Gentry , and NBA championship winning coach Mike Budenholzer…just…didn’t…see the diamond in the rough! Trade the farm, uplift the Mavs who are on the verge of imploding and get him here STAT!!!!!!
-
-
-
You know what. I’m not even going to respond to your childish insults and taunts. At this point, I even question whether I want to continue to keep this blog open.
-
I just find all of this utterly absurd. We haven’t even seen the team play and you’re regularly posting articles about trades that can’t happen for months. Not even bothering to theorize about fit or roster cohesion or anything regarding the guys actually on the team right now. Just how fast can we ship ’em right back out. I honestly do not get that type of fandom, being more of a fan of a trade than of players because as soon a we acquire a player they go on the trading block in a day or two. If not faster.
I’m not much of a D-Lo fan, for example, but I would really like to see him work out here. Not because it ups his trade value but because that means the team is working. For me at least there is an element of humanity and the belief that if sport somehow mirrors life in any way then a team can overcome an individual’s weaknesses. That a guy like Vando who can’t shot the three well still can be a huge part of a winning culture, like Udonis Haslem but much younger and can actually play. That just looking at stats and seeing a small chance for improvement…but no guarantee of it…isn’t a good reason to trade someone.
That’s just me, though. I get that trades are exciting to some people. Generally, that’s not the case for myself. However, when you’re advocating trading the three point shooting version of Kwame Brown for JV I’m going to ridicule it…because the premise in and of itself is ridiculous, in my opinion. If you advocated trading Jarred Vanderbilt as part of a deal for Lauri Markakken or someone actually good at basketball I might feel differently.
That’s not the case here. Christian Wood is hotter garbage than Miles Bridges, who signed with the Hornets today. That’s not my opinion, that’s the opinion of every GM in the Association who has had a chance to acquire his talents and hard-passed for anything higher than the vet minimum. I get Wood waiting and hoping for some kind of offer beyond the vet minimum, it must be a hard time for a player entering their prime and believing they have some unique skill set only to find the phone is quiet and your agent has no good news.
I also get the Mavs hoping to recoup something from their awful investment of a first round draft pick. That only makes sense for them and of course they’d love to be a part of a sign and trade. it means they’re at least getting something and they need to show Luka they’re not spinning their wheels in the mud (which I think they are).
But I do not get why the Lakers should overpay or why anyone who watched the team would think it’s a good idea. Don’t see the logic or the sense in it. We’re talking about the polar opposite of the effect Wood has on team culture, tight? Vando came along and we rocketed up the standings…mostly without LeBron…while the Mavs all but benched Wood and sank.
Don’t mean to pile on but this one makes zero sense. Sam Quinn is crazy for even coming up with such a ludicrous notion and if the Lakers actually go through with it I’ll be pissed.
-
I’ve been seriously thinking of closing down the Lakerholics website. Like everything in life, there comes a time when change is needed.
Much like politics, having intelligent open discussions has become a thing of the past. This used to be the best. Time for something new.
I’m going to take some time off but right now, I think this may be the last month for Lakerholics.com. Have a nice summer, everybody. Go, Lakers!
-
No, no, no and NO! In
my neck of the woods we get alot of “HAIL” No! Many of us appreciate all you do LT. Let NO-ONE run you out!! -
Aloha Tom, the biggest issue is you are relentless. I don’t know if you realize it or not but you posted about trading for Wood 10 times in the last 2 days. And you do not engage in any sort of discussion. I have brought up my concern about LeBron having to defend the wing this late in his career but you don’t address that concern. I have brought up my concern about Wood at 214 pounds defending big centers. You have not addressed that either. You just double down on 37% from 3. I personally am looking forward to watching this team and I don’t think I’m not alone there. But when it’s not a post about Wood, it’s trade ideas for big names that can’t even happen until the end of the year. I do appreciate the blog, but I just would like to see some balance. I would like more talk about what we have and how we can use these pieces. Your article a few days ago about the 5 things was really good and I enjoyed reading it. More content like that would be welcomed by everyone. We all have our opinions and they are all valid but it becomes a little tiresome when you don’t engage those other opinions and just continue to state yours.
-
Please let us all chill. This is getting out of hand. Let’s adhere to the principles and basics of etiquette and maintain a high standard of decorum for this blog. We must show tact in dealing with one another. That’s what makes this blog a lot more unique and different from many others. Time to bury the hatchet.
-
-
-
-
-
5 Reasons Why Lakers Should Trade Jarred Vanderbilt for Christian Wood
Teams that win championships are the teams willing to take the calculated risks to become great.
They answer the door and take advantage when opportunity like Vando for Wood knocks.https://t.co/QvJDbUR6Hc— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 17, 2023
-
It’s amazing how much better Christian Wood has gotten since being unceremoniously dumped by the Mavs.
-
I know right? It’s not just the Mav’s, the entire league has passed on him.
-
Right? At 27 he evidently has a massive amount of upside, too! Because all those teams with needs for size and shooting just kinda don’t like him or whatever. Vet min no loss of Phoenix pays him more. I’ll take 3 guys like Vando over Wood all day, every day.
-
The ironic thing for me is that Tom railed against Thomas Bryant because of his defense. Thomas shot 44% from 3. 12 ppg in 21 minutes, nearly 7 boards a game. He also hustled. Something Woods not known for. But Tom wants Wood even though his defense is at least as bad as Bryant and probably worse for lack of hustle.
-
I gave up on LakerTom’s logic a very long time ago. It boggles the mind. He’s already shipping guys out we have t seen play…yet Rob is a masterclass genius savant! Just doesn’t compute.
There is a non-hyperbolic way to frame this that are left on the wayside. Phrases like “should this current iteration of the Lakers not work out as hoped” or even better “if for proves awkward or injuries make our need for another high calorie, low efficiency scorer more pressing” and even words like “potential” or “future” or “Just spit-balling because I’m bored, done with my morning constitutional and am addicted to NBA trade machines”. But that’s never how it’s framed. It just makes it funny, to me anyhow.
-
Exactly. Thomas Bryant? Baaaaaaad fit, terrible and it’s a good thing we traded him since he wouldn’t have had a role against Denver for us (he would have). Oh look! Christian Wood who is even worse!!! Must trade and willing to over pay to boot!
-
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The Lakers have surrounded superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis with an impressive collection of battle-tested young talent that can not only win now but also be part of building championship rosters for the future.
While the Lakers are bringing back all 5 starters and 2 of 5 main backups, they’re also relying on a new untested backups at point guard in Gabe Vincent, small forward in Taurean Prince, and center in Jaxson Hayes. Vincent should be an upgrade over Schroder and Prince finally means the Lakers will have a solid 3&D wing to back up LeBron. The gamble is Jaxson Hayes as the backup center. Can he just do what Lakers need him to do?
Additionally, the Lakers are counting on an untested 20-year old second year guard Max Christie to backup shooting guard. While the Lakers have a lot of upside to like in their backups, they also are vulnerable to wild cards. Wild cards are potentially game changing factors that could either propel or derail a season: supposed strengths that turn into weaknesses when stressed or vulnerabilities that get taken advantage of when exposed.
On paper, the Los Angeles Lakers have made a series of moves ‘on the margins’ to improve their roster size and depth. Whether that translates to the Lakers winning a championship will depend on these five wild cards.
1. Health
When both of your two superstars have missed significant parts of the last three seasons due to injuries, health has to be the single most important wild card that could either propel or derail the Lakers’ 2023–24 season.
The Lakers took smart steps this offseason as insurance against LeBron James or Anthony Davis possibly suffering an injury by getting bigger, deeper, younger, and less reliant on their superstars carrying the load. Strategically, the Lakers hope a deep, diverse, and talented roster could prevent the team from having to overly rely on LeBron James and Anthony Davis to the point where they’re overplayed and, as a result, injured.
LeBron and the Lakers have always been reluctant to fully embrace load management as as strategic priority but the time has come for them to consider setting limits of 30 minutes per game on both James and Davis. That doesn’t mean you can’t break the rule to win a specific game or change it in the playoffs. It just means that you want to wean the team from over relying on their superstars and limit superstar minutes to prevent injuries.
Hopefully, embracing load management will be the wild card that enables the Lakers to keep LeBron James and Anthony Davis fresher and injury free during the long regular season and ready to thrive in the playoffs.
2. Youth
The Lakers’ second biggest wild card is their heavy reliance on youth with 20-year old shooting guard Max Christie and 23-year old center Jaxson Hayes projected as Austin Reaves’ and Anthony Davis’ primary backups.
Those are two major rotation roles that will require leaps in the growth and development of young Max Christie and Jaxson Hayes. While only 20 years old, the Lakers are confident Christie is ready for a role in the rotation. While he’s only in his second year, Max’s game’s already taken a huge leap per his summer league play, showing why the Lakers are justified to have him penciled in the 10-man rotation with which they’ll start this season.
Hayes is a bigger question mark as he was unable to hold a rotation spot in New Orleans despite elite athleticism, talent, and size. Jax realizes this is a great opportunity for him but he will need to focus on protecting the rim. The Lakers believe Hayes could be their center of the future and envision him at some point starting alongside Anthony Davis as the team returns to the two bigs lineups that won the 2020 NBA championship in the bubble.
The Lakers are asking a lot of 20-year old Christy and 23-year old Hayes and will bring them along slowly as key pieces in the rotation. It would be a big wild card for the Lakers if the young Max and Jax can grow into their roles.
3. Size
Size is another Lakers’ wild card. One of their goals this summer was to get bigger at every position: in the backcourt, on the wings, and even at center where they would like to return to the 2020 championship two-bigs model.
The Lakers added 6′ 11′ Hayes, 6′ 8″ Prince, 6′ 7″ Reddish, 6′ 7″ Lewis, 6′ 6″ Hood-Schifino, and 6′ 2″ Vincent to go with 6′ 10″ Davis, 6′ 9″ James, 6′ 8″ Vanderbilt, 6′ 8″ Hachimura, 6′ 6″ Russell, 6′ 5″ Reaves, and 6′ 5″ Christie. That’s a big lineup with 9 players with wingspans over 7′. What’s missing, though, are the quicker smaller guards like Dennis Schroder who can beat defenders off the dribble offensively but are a size liability defensively.
Strategically, the Lakers have been able to compensate for their negative 3-point differential by outscoring opponents in the paint and at the line despite their glaring lack of size in front and backcourt all season long.
By getting bigger and more athletic, the Lakers are hoping they’ll be able to build even bigger advantages in points-in-the-paint and made free throws. It’s their formula for how to win in the NBA without great 3-point shooting.Size is a wild card that often gets trumped by speed and quickness. The Lakers are doubling down that getting bigger and longer will help them increase their advantages in points-in-the-paint and made free throws.
4. Depth
There is no team in the NBA more starpower driven than the Los Angeles Lakers, where superstars and championships have become synonymous. Yet the Lakers opted to add depth rather than starpower this offseason.
For starpower driven teams like the Lakers, depth has usually been filled with over-the-hill veterans on minimum contracts looking for one last hurrah and an opportunity to win a championship ring before they retire. Rather than add a third star, the Lakers spent their limited cap space on adding depth in the form of young, big, long, and athletic players who can not only backup their starters but also grow and develop into starters.
When analysts look at what Rob Pelinka has done in rebuilding the Lakers on the fly, the most astonishing aspect of the accomplishment is how he has surrounded LeBron and AD with nothing but young athletic players. That’s why depth is a wild card that could come back to haunt the Lakers. They not only did not bring in a veteran scorer like Bogdanovic to close games. Instead they invested win-now resources in the future.
Part of the Lakers’ grand strategy is building a team that has a beating and thriving heart of talented young players with promising upsides that is continually replenished. The Lakers’ wild card is inexperienced depth.
5. Continuity
The good news is the Lakers have finally put together a 13-player roster that is maybe one player away from being a championship caliber squad. The bad news is only 7 of the 13 players were from last season’s roster.
Frankly, the Lakers season-closing finish to make the playoffs much less the conference finals was miraculous and maybe unrepeatable when you consider how little time they had playing together to do what they did. That’s why continuity is still a major wild card with this team. On paper, the Lakers look like a much better and deeper team. They do have five starters and two of five primary backups returning so there’s hope they can gell.
Pelinka has now completed 80% of the job of transforming the Los Angeles Lakers from a lottery team to a championship contender. All that remains is adding a big to the current roster and trading for that last puzzle piece. What’s most astonishing about Pelinka’s makeover is what this deep and talented young roster means in terms of the franchise’s sustainability when LeBron James retires. Lakers are positioned to not miss a beat.
While the Lakers have finally committed to building a sustainable deep roster, their current lack of continuity is potentially the team’s greatest wild card. Hopefully, James and Davis leadership will be able to overcome that.
-
On paper, the Los Angeles Lakers have made a series of moves ‘on the margins’ to improve their roster size and depth. Whether that translates to the Lakers winning a championship will depend on these five wild cards.https://t.co/YuOtIVM60t
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 16, 2023
-
Five Wild Cards That Could Decide Whether Lakers Win Championship
1. Health
2. Youth
3. Size
4. Depth
5. Continuityhttps://t.co/YuOtIVM60t— LakerTom (@LakerTom) July 16, 2023
-
Aloha Tom, nice post. I agree with pretty much everything. While we do have a lot of new players it’s much better than the last few years. We really only have to interstate 3 guys into the rotation this year. As opposed to almost the entire roster in the past. So that’s at least a solid 1st step in the right direction. I also think we will be better off at 3 point shooting then you tend to believe. Part of our low ranking was that we shot under 30% for the first month and a half. DLO shot 39%. So did Austin and he shot 44% in the playoffs. Prince shot 38%. Max has shot 50% in summer league, proving his 41% last season wasn’t a fluke. And Rui shot 49% in the playoffs. While I don’t expect that during the season, I don’t think it is a stretch to think he can shoot 38 to 40%. Oh by the way. One correction. Rui is 6’ 8” not 6’ 6”.
-
Thanks, Michael. I do think we will shoot a little better but the problem is still out volume 3-point shooter is LeBron. Best we can hope for is marginal improvement unless we sign Wood or trade for a volume 3-point shooter at the deadline. We may not need it as badly if we get bigger but we risk getting shot out in a series, which is essentially what happened to us with the Nuggets.
-
I don’t really look at Wood as the answer. I mean he shot a half a 3 more then Prince in 4 more minutes a game. Prince out shot him .381 to .376. Prince can defend as well.
-
Need waay more shots from “Funky!” We know if you knock em down, LBJ will set you up!
-
-
-
Can’t argue with health. Honestly it’s reasons 1,2,3,4 and 5. Bubble Banner never really got a fair shake at recreating its magic because of health. Sure Rob moved in from Dwight too quick while pivoting to the unreliable (at that point) Marc Gasol and made a slew of bad moves after so that’s what was the main takeaway from last season. We pivoted away from 2 bad summers as well as could ever be hoped for.
-
Now, in terms of the job Rob has done, he’s all but finished. Once Wood ends up in Phoenix thanks to the Cam Payne trade opening up a $6.8 million dollar TPE, the Lakers really have 2 choices: stuck w/potential (go with a player Castleton) or mentorship/vet savvy and lean into Tristian Thonpson taking the coveted (and dare I say over-valued) Leadership Mentor Guy role.
-
So, other than health, your point about not over-estimating the Laker chemistry/maturitu and general carry-over is also spot on. This squad, like most of the association, which is the question that both wrankles fans and is the secret behind the glory of sport. “Great season! Well done, what an improvement! Look you won s title! Quite impressive. Now show me you can do it again and do it hetter.”
-
Your average “newly monted champion of whatever sport” honeymoon ain’t long. I’d wager no more than 2 weeks for the guys with the Greatness gene. If that. It’s so cute how the Nuggets and Denver fanbase are so very focused that they beat us so handidly…in the conferrence finals. That belies a wrak mentality, especially when you start to appreciate how hard it is to repeat. Denver gonna be the champs all year, show me you can do it again.
-
Lakers are in the same, badic boat. Good job, do it sgain but better. If they don’t it won’t just be LT fake trading everyone off the tram months and months and months and months before they can actually be traded along with having seen the cutrent yeam play exactly zero times but also,maybe (but probably not) someone who can make a trade.
-
-
-
-
-
One thing I’d like to see is Jalen Hood-Schifino getting some meaningful minutes and playing well. I take Summer League results with a grain of salt but he’s looked pretty decent. Not sure if that can translate to actual NBA games as a rookie but it would make it alot easier to move away from D.Russell in a trade a few months from now….I’m also anxious to see what a Vincent / Christie backcourt looks like off the bench…could be interesting.
-
- Load More Posts
TOM WONG
Founder and Publisher
“Welcome to the new Lakerholics website. We wanted to create a place that would become the favorite online home for informed and passionate Lakers fans.
Please click ‘CONTACT US’ and let us know how we did, ‘JOIN US’ to become a member, or ‘SUBSCRIBE’ to receive our newsletter.
We promise to open your eyes, ears, and mind to brand-new purple and gold world.”
-LakerTom
FEATURED POST
5 Things: Lakers Fall Flat and Get Rolled
Nothing to learn from this other than how to move on from a bad loss. The Phoenix game, even though we coughed up a late lead, felt competitive. This game never did as the Cavs got what they wanted, when they wanted, and how they wanted it. There was not much resistance offered from the […]
FEATURED PODCAST
NBA Observations- Big Money Spent For The Clippers And Heat, Are The Lakers Next?
The guys from the Lakers Fast Break return for some NBA Observation as they share thoughts on the recent big-money extensions for Miami coach Erik Spoelstra and the Clipper’s Kawhi Leonard. Does this mean the Lakers will be opening up their wallet a little more as well? Plus after Toronto Raptors coach Darko Rajakovic’s huge rant after the Lakers game because of the fourth-quarter free throw disparity, we ponder if Darvin Ham will ever show that kind of energy if he remains as the guys on the sidelines for LA. We’re back talking some big $$$, and wondering if the Lakers are ready to go on a spending spree? Find out our thoughts on the latest Lakers Fast Break podcast!
Don’t forget to watch the Lakers games with us LIVE at playback.tv/lakersfastbreak and our newest Lakers Fast Break merchandise site is now up at https://tinyurl.com/39yb4ta3, check it out!
Please Like, Share, and Subscribe to our channel and our social media @lakersfastbreak on Twitter.
If you have questions, give us a shout-out on Twitter, YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook, or send us your thoughts to lakersfastbreak@yahoo.com or become a supporter of the Lakers Fast Break today at https://anchor.fm/lakers-fast-break
The views and opinions expressed on the Lakers Fast Break are those of the panelists or guests themselves and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Lakers Fast Break or its owners. Any content or thoughts provided by our panelists or guests are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, anyone, or anything.
Presented by our friends at lakerholics.com, lakersball.com, Pop Culture Cosmos, Inside Sports Fantasy Football, Vampires and Vitae, SynBlades.com, YouTube’s John Mikaelian, the novel Congratulations, You Suck (available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble), The Happy Hoarder, EmpireJeffTV, Larry Lakers Dribbling Chat Chat, Lakers Corner, and Retro City Games!
FEATURED TWEET
Lakers stars used speed and space of transition as stage for talent
https://twitter.com/Lakers/status/1437491268544835595
LAKERHOLICS LINKS
Library of Links to Everything Lakers
LAKERHOLICS MEMBERS
A Los Angeles Lakers Community
ABOUT LAKERHOLICS
Dedicated to Kobe and Gigi Bryant
Recent Comments
WHO’S ONLINE
[who-is-online-now]